Rated Care Homes

Brackenlea Care Home

RI

Requires improvement

Rated on

Rating from the Care Quality Commission.

At a glance

  • 3 ratings

    Its last inspection moved it down from Good to Requires improvement.

  • 12 months

    since the latest rating was published.

  • 59 of 420

    rated care homes in Hampshire are rated Requires improvement, like this one.

Brackenlea Care Home: inspection record

Care home, 25 beds, Hampshire

Rated Requires improvement in October 2025, down from Good.

Brackenlea Care Home: inspection record: inspection ratings by year, 2015 to 2026
201520162017201820192020202120222023202420252026
Overall
Safe
Effective
Caring
Responsive
Well-led

Ratings published by the Care Quality Commission.

Compare nearby

Nearest rated Good or Outstanding: Compton House (Good, 0.3 miles away) and Otterbourne House (Good, 0.3 miles away).

Nearest care homes:

  1. G
    Compton House Good, 0.3 miles away
  2. G
    Otterbourne House Good, 0.3 miles away
  3. –
    Shawford Springs Care Home Not yet rated, 0.7 miles away
  4. –
    St Cross Grange Care Home Not yet rated, 1.6 miles away
  5. –
    Otterbourne Care Not yet rated, 1.6 miles away

See all care homes in Hampshire

See all care homes in Shawford

What inspectors found

From the Care Quality Commission's assessment published 23 October 2025 (assessment visit 16 September 2025). Quoted under the Open Government Licence.

We carried out this inspection from 29 September 2025 to 01 October 2025. The service is a care home which supports up to 25 older people who may be living with dementia, or whom have a physical disability or mental health diagnosis. There were 24 people accommodated at the first site visit and a further person was in hospital. This was a responsive inspection of all 5 key questions triggered by our ongoing monitoring of the service.

  • Safe No rating
  • Effective Good
  • Caring Good
  • Responsive Good
  • Well-led No rating
Read the rest of CQC's summary

The provider had not ensured people were sufficiently protected from the risks of acquiring an infection. Staff had not followed all infection control guidance in order to prevent and mitigate the risk of outbreaks spreading for people.

Staff had not ensured people’s medicines were always administered safely. The provider could not be assured medicines requiring refrigeration were continuously stored at a safe temperature. Some medicines lacked sufficient guidance about administration to inform staff.

The provider did not always ensure all potential risks to people were understood and managed. Staff had not undertaken training in modified diets and people’s care plans lacked guidance in relation to some of the potential risks associated with their diabetes, or use of air mattresses.

The provider had not ensured all risks to people from water safety had been mitigated and managed. Staff had not consistently secured all areas of the home where chemicals and maintenance tools were stored, for people’s safety.

The provider did not have robust processes to identify potential health and safety issues and did not always react swiftly for people’s safety. A wide range of audits were completed, but these did not identify all the issues we found.

We identified 3 breaches of regulations in relation to safe care and treatment, premises and equipment and good governance. The registered manager and provider have been responsive to our findings and commenced the required improvements, but this will take further time to fully complete and embed.

We have asked the provider for an action plan in response to the concerns found at this inspection.

However, the service had an open culture, staff felt able to speak up about issues, which were acted upon. Staff reported incidents which were then investigated, and any required actions were taken.

Staff assessed a range of potential risks to people, such as from falls and understood how to manage them. There were enough regular staff to provide people’s care safely. The provider ensured safety checks had been completed in relation to electrical, fire and gas safety. The home was visibly clean.

Staff assessed people’s care needs with them and where people lacked the capacity to consent to their care, legal requirements were met. Staff worked well both as a team and in collaboration with external professionals to ensure people’s needs were met.

People received their care from kind and compassionate staff, who knew them well and whom respected and upheld their rights. People were supported to be as independent as possible. Staff were responsive and ensured people were well supported at the end of their life.

People’s care was person centred and their care plans were reviewed regularly. The registered manager sought people’s views on the service and acted upon their feedback. Staff understood the care needs of the people they supported.

  1. Safe

    No rating

    Safe – this means we looked for evidence that people were protected from abuse and avoidable harm. At our last assessment we rated this key question good. At this assessment the rating has changed to requires improvement. This meant some aspects of the service were not always safe.

    The service was in breach of legal regulations both in relation to safe care and treatment and premises and equipment.

  2. Effective

    Good

    Effective – this means we looked for evidence that people’s care, treatment and support achieved good outcomes and promoted a good quality of life, based on best available evidence.

    At our last assessment we rated this key question good. At this assessment the rating has remained good. This meant people’s outcomes were consistently good, and people’s feedback confirmed this.

  3. Caring

    Good

    Caring – this means we looked for evidence that the provider involved people and treated them with compassion, kindness, dignity and respect.

    At our last assessment we rated this key question good. At this assessment the rating has remained good. This meant people were supported and treated with dignity and respect; and involved as partners in their care.

  4. Responsive

    Good

    Responsive – this means we looked for evidence that the provider met people’s needs.

    At our last assessment we rated this key question good. At this assessment the rating has remained good. This meant people’s needs were met through good organisation and delivery.

  5. Well-led

    No rating

    Well-led – this means we looked for evidence that service leadership, management and governance assured high-quality, person-centred care; supported learning and innovation; and promoted an open, fair culture.

    At our last assessment we rated this key question good. At this assessment the rating has changed to requires improvement. This meant the management and leadership was inconsistent. Leaders and the culture they created did not always support the delivery of high-quality care.

    The service was in breach of legal regulations in relation to governance.

Questions to ask when you visit

  1. Safe was rated Requires improvement on 23 October 2025. Ask how medicines are managed, how staffing levels are decided and how incidents are reviewed.
  2. Well-led was rated Requires improvement on 23 October 2025. Ask about changes in management and what has changed since the report.
  3. Ask to see the most recent Care Quality Commission (CQC) report and what the home did about any points in it.

Registration details

Registered manager
Beverley Rice
Registered with the CQC since
What it provides
Care home service without nursing
Who it supports
Dementia, Mental Health, Older People, Physical Disability

Inspection report

Read the full inspection report (opens the Care Quality Commission website)

2 inspection reports, latest 27 June 2018. Latest assessment published 23 October 2025; the Care Quality Commission's newer assessments are published on its website rather than as reports.

The rating is the Care Quality Commission's. We show it as published and do not change it.

Who runs it

Provider
Brackenlea Care Homes LimitedBrand: Brookvale Healthcare
Ownership type
Organisation
Companies House number
09409257 (opens Companies House)

Getting help from Hampshire County Council

The council can assess what care someone needs and tell them what help with the cost they may get.

Checked on the council's website, November 2026.

Common questions

Does Brackenlea Care Home provide nursing care?
No. The Care Quality Commission lists Brackenlea Care Home as a care home without nursing.
How many beds does Brackenlea Care Home have?
The Care Quality Commission's register lists 25 beds at Brackenlea Care Home.
When was Brackenlea Care Home last inspected?
The Care Quality Commission's latest rating for Brackenlea Care Home was published on 23 October 2025.
Who runs Brackenlea Care Home?
Brackenlea Care Home is run by Brackenlea Care Homes Limited.
What is Brackenlea Care Home's CQC rating?
Its overall rating from the Care Quality Commission is Requires improvement, published on 23 October 2025.

Contact

Phone
01962 713242
Address
Pearson Lane, Winchester, SO21 2AG Map (opens Google Maps)
Read the full inspection report (opens the Care Quality Commission website)

Compare nearby

Nearest rated Good or Outstanding: Compton House (Good, 0.3 miles away) and Otterbourne House (Good, 0.3 miles away).

Nearest care homes:

  1. G
    Compton House Good, 0.3 miles away
  2. G
    Otterbourne House Good, 0.3 miles away
  3. –
    Shawford Springs Care Home Not yet rated, 0.7 miles away
  4. –
    St Cross Grange Care Home Not yet rated, 1.6 miles away
  5. –
    Otterbourne Care Not yet rated, 1.6 miles away

See all care homes in Hampshire

See all care homes in Shawford