Archmoor Care Home
- Care home
- 20 beds
- No nursing
- Registered since 2011
- Middleton, Rochdale, North West
Requires improvement
Rated on
Rating from the Care Quality Commission.
At a glance
6 ratings
First rated Good in 2015, most recently Requires improvement in April 2026.
6 months
since the latest rating was published.
18 of 54
rated care homes in Rochdale are rated Requires improvement, like this one.
Archmoor Care Home: inspection record
Rated Requires improvement in April 2026.
| 2015 | 2016 | 2017 | 2018 | 2019 | 2020 | 2021 | 2022 | 2023 | 2024 | 2025 | 2026 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Overall | ||||||||||||
| Safe | ||||||||||||
| Effective | ||||||||||||
| Caring | ||||||||||||
| Responsive | ||||||||||||
| Well-led |
Ratings published by the Care Quality Commission.
Compare nearby
Nearest rated Good or Outstanding: Middleton Hall Care Home (Good, 0.3 miles away) and Springvale Resource Centre (Good, 0.4 miles away).
Nearest care homes:
- G Middleton Hall Care Home Good, 0.3 miles away
- G Springvale Resource Centre Good, 0.4 miles away
- RI Hulton Care Home Requires improvement, 0.7 miles away
- – Lyndhurst Residential Care Home Not yet rated, 1 mile away
- RI Clare Mount Requires improvement, 1.2 miles away
What inspectors found
From the Care Quality Commission's assessment published 22 April 2026 (assessment visit 31 December 2025). Quoted under the Open Government Licence.
Date of assessment: 28 January to 04 February 2026.
Archmoor Care Home is a residential care home, registered with the Care Quality Commission (CQC) to provide care to a maximum of 20 adults over 65 years. At the time of this assessment 17 people were accommodated.
- Safe No rating
- Effective Good
- Caring No rating
- Responsive Good
- Well-led No rating
Read the rest of CQC's summary
At this assessment, we found 3 breaches of regulations in respect of person-centred care, good governance and staffing.
Gaps remained in the providers ability to demonstrate organisational learning, to remedy identified actions in a timely manner, and to properly embed a culture of continuous improvement. Some people had been identified as being at risk of falls, particularly at night, but systems to alert staff to these dangers were not adequate. Our checks showed window restrictors on some upper-floor windows did not comply with current safety regulations. This was because the mechanism to restrict the window was a simple nail and chain.
There were insufficient numbers of staff deployed to meet people’s needs, particularly in the morning. During the day, there was 1 senior carer and 2 care assistants, with the senior mostly deployed to medicines administration duties. This meant 2 carers were left to support everyone else. Care staff were also expected to manage the laundry function. On several occasions we observed people asking for assistance to go to the toilet, but with only 1 member of staff present in the lounge, people were asked to wait. There was lack of meaningful activities, and people told us there wasn’t enough to do during the day.
Insufficient progress had been made to support governance. We saw several template documents in use, with no standard process properly embedded into everyday practice. Where audits and quality assurance had been completed, records did not adequately set out issues and actions.
However, throughout our assessment visit we observed many examples of natural, kind, caring and compassionate interactions between people and staff. People were supported to live healthier lives through regular access to primary care services such as GP, community nurses and chiropody. The provider had invested in a new digital care planning system. Care records we looked at were person-centred and contained a good level of detail. Staff worked with external professionals and services to ensure people’s care delivery was well co-ordinated.
In instances where CQC has begun a process of regulatory action, we may publish this information on our website after any representations and/or appeals have been concluded, if the action has been taken forward.
We also have asked the provider for an action plan in response to the concerns found at this assessment.
-
Safe
No rating
Safe – this means we looked for evidence that people were protected from abuse and avoidable harm. At our last assessment we rated this key question requires improvement. At this assessment the rating has remained requires improvement.
This meant some aspects of the service were not always safe and there was limited assurance about safety. There was an increased risk that people could be harmed.
The service was in breach of regulations in relation to staffing levels. This is because there was insufficient staffing levels to meet people’s needs.
-
Effective
Good
Effective – this means we looked for evidence that people’s care, treatment and support achieved good outcomes and promoted a good quality of life, based on best available evidence.
At our last assessment we rated this key question good. At this assessment the rating has remained good. This meant people’s outcomes were consistent.
-
Caring
No rating
Caring – this means we looked for evidence that the provider involved people and treated them with compassion, kindness, dignity and respect.
At our last assessment we rated this key question good. At this assessment the rating has changed to requires improvement. This meant people did not always feel well-supported.
The service was in breach of legal regulation in relation to person-centred care. This was because people were not always able to access meaningful person-centred activities.
-
Responsive
Good
Responsive – this means we looked for evidence that the provider met people’s needs.
At our last assessment we rated this key question good. At this assessment the rating has remained good. This meant people’s needs were mostly met.
-
Well-led
No rating
Well-led – this means we looked for evidence that service leadership, management and governance assured high-quality, person-centred care; supported learning and innovation; and promoted an open, fair culture.
At our last assessment we rated this key question requires improvement. At this assessment the rating has remained requires improvement. This meant provider leadership was inconsistent and did not always support the delivery of high-quality, person-centred care.
The service was in breach of regulation in relation to good governance. This was because systems to support quality, safety and continuous learning were not operating effectively.
Questions to ask when you visit
- Safe was rated Requires improvement on 22 April 2026. Ask how medicines are managed, how staffing levels are decided and how incidents are reviewed.
- Caring was rated Requires improvement on 22 April 2026. Ask how staff protect dignity and how residents are involved in decisions about their care.
- Well-led was rated Requires improvement on 22 April 2026. Ask about changes in management and what has changed since the report.
Registration details
- Registered manager
- Sharon Donaghy
- Registered with the CQC since
- What it provides
- Care home service without nursing
- Who it supports
- Older People
Inspection report
Read the full inspection report (opens the Care Quality Commission website)10 inspection reports, latest 3 August 2022. Latest assessment published 22 April 2026; the Care Quality Commission's newer assessments are published on its website rather than as reports.
The rating is the Care Quality Commission's. We show it as published and do not change it.
Who runs it
- Provider
- Archmoor Care Limited
- Ownership type
- Organisation
- Companies House number
- 06971335 (opens Companies House)
Getting help from Rochdale Borough Council
The council can assess what care someone needs and tell them what help with the cost they may get.
- Adult social care at Rochdale Borough Council
- Ask for a care needs assessment
- Phone: 0300 303 8886, Monday to Friday 8.30am to 4.45pm
- Support for carers
- Paying for care: Rochdale Borough Council
Checked on the council's website, November 2026.
Common questions
- Does Archmoor Care Home provide nursing care?
- No. The Care Quality Commission lists Archmoor Care Home as a care home without nursing.
- How many beds does Archmoor Care Home have?
- The Care Quality Commission's register lists 20 beds at Archmoor Care Home.
- When was Archmoor Care Home last inspected?
- The Care Quality Commission's latest rating for Archmoor Care Home was published on 22 April 2026.
- Who runs Archmoor Care Home?
- Archmoor Care Home is run by Archmoor Care Limited.
- What is Archmoor Care Home's CQC rating?
- Its overall rating from the Care Quality Commission is Requires improvement, published on 22 April 2026.
Contact
- Phone
- 0161 653 2454
- Address
- 116 Sandy Lane, Middleton, Manchester, M24 2FU Map (opens Google Maps)
Compare nearby
Nearest rated Good or Outstanding: Middleton Hall Care Home (Good, 0.3 miles away) and Springvale Resource Centre (Good, 0.4 miles away).
Nearest care homes:
- G Middleton Hall Care Home Good, 0.3 miles away
- G Springvale Resource Centre Good, 0.4 miles away
- RI Hulton Care Home Requires improvement, 0.7 miles away
- – Lyndhurst Residential Care Home Not yet rated, 1 mile away
- RI Clare Mount Requires improvement, 1.2 miles away