Rated Care Homes

Briar House

RI

Requires improvement

Rated on

Rating from the Care Quality Commission.

At a glance

  • 5 ratings

    Its last inspection moved it down from Good to Requires improvement.

  • 2 months

    since the latest rating was published.

  • 86 of 288

    rated care homes in Norfolk are rated Requires improvement, like this one.

Briar House: inspection record

Care home, 62 beds, Norfolk

Rated Requires improvement in August 2026, down from Good.

Briar House: inspection record: inspection ratings by year, 2015 to 2026
201520162017201820192020202120222023202420252026
Overall
Safe
Effective
Caring
Responsive
Well-led

Ratings published by the Care Quality Commission.

Compare nearby

Nearest rated Good or Outstanding: Kings Lynn Residential Home (Good, 0.4 miles away) and Portland Street (Good, 0.6 miles away).

Nearest care homes:

  1. G
    Kings Lynn Residential Home Good, 0.4 miles away
  2. RI
    Manton House Requires improvement, 0.5 miles away
  3. G
    Portland Street Good, 0.6 miles away
  4. RI
    Faro Lodge Requires improvement, 0.8 miles away
  5. G
    The Mallards Good, 0.9 miles away

See all care homes in Norfolk

See all care homes in King's Lynn

What inspectors found

From the Care Quality Commission's assessment published 21 August 2026 (assessment visit 11 June 2026). Quoted under the Open Government Licence.

Date of inspection: 16 June to 22 July 2026.

The service is a residential home providing accommodation with nursing and personal care for older people and people living with dementia. The service is registered to support 62 people, however at the time of the inspection they were only able to support a maximum of 51 people. There were 47 people living in the service at the time the inspection commenced.

  • Safe No rating
  • Effective No rating
  • Caring Good
  • Responsive Good
  • Well-led No rating
Read the rest of CQC's summary

The home is separated into 3 areas, Lavender unit which is currently closed for refurbishment. Honeysuckle unit which is on the ground floor and Sunflower unit which is on the first floor.

This was a comprehensive inspection of all quality statements, which was prompted due to the age of the last rating. The last comprehensive inspection of the service was in 2018, where the service was rated as Good. The provider had changed since the last inspection, and this was the first inspection under the current provider.

We carried out unannounced visits to the service on 16, 18 June 2026 and 16 July 2026.

This inspection found the service was in breach of 1 legal regulation relating to good governance.

We found concerns relating to governance systems and processes in place to monitor and assess the safety of the environment, medicines management and consent.

Consent had not always been lawfully obtained in accordance with the Mental Capacity Act 2005.

We found that staff were caring and supported people in a kind and considerate manner. Staff worked well with healthcare professionals.

We raised our concerns with the provider at the time of the inspection; actions had been taken to address the concerns relating to the environment. However, further actions are needed to improve the service.

  1. Safe

    No rating

    Safe – this means we looked for evidence that people were protected from abuse and avoidable harm. At our last assessment we rated this key question Good. At this assessment the rating has changed to requires improvement.

    This meant some aspects of the service were not always safe and there was limited assurance about safety. There was an increased risk that people could be harmed.

  2. Effective

    No rating

    Effective – this means we looked for evidence that people’s care, treatment and support achieved good outcomes and promoted a good quality of life, based on best available evidence.

    At our last assessment we rated this key question good. At this assessment the rating has changed to requires improvement.

    This meant the effectiveness of people’s care, treatment and support did not always achieve good outcomes or was inconsistent.

  3. Caring

    Good

    Caring – this means we looked for evidence that the provider involved people and treated them with compassion, kindness, dignity and respect.

    At our last assessment we rated this key question good. At this assessment the rating has remained as good.

    This meant people were supported and treated with dignity and respect; and involved as partners in their care.

  4. Responsive

    Good

    Responsive – this means we looked for evidence that the provider met people’s needs.

    At our last assessment we rated this key question good. At this assessment the rating has remained as good.

    This meant people’s needs were met through good organisation and delivery.

  5. Well-led

    No rating

    Well-led – this means we looked for evidence that service leadership, management and governance assured high-quality, person-centred care; supported learning and innovation; and promoted an open, fair culture.

    At our last assessment we rated this key question good. At this assessment the rating has changed to requires improvement.

    This meant the management and leadership was inconsistent. Leaders and the culture they created did not always support the delivery of high-quality, person-centred care.

    The service was in breach of legal regulation in relation to good governance at the service.

Questions to ask when you visit

  1. Safe was rated Requires improvement on 21 August 2026. Ask how medicines are managed, how staffing levels are decided and how incidents are reviewed.
  2. Effective was rated Requires improvement on 21 August 2026. Ask about staff training and how health appointments are arranged.
  3. Well-led was rated Requires improvement on 21 August 2026. Ask about changes in management and what has changed since the report.

Registration details

Registered manager
Peter Dean
Registered with the CQC since
What it provides
Care home service without nursing
Who it supports
Dementia, Older People

Inspection report

Read the full inspection report (opens the Care Quality Commission website)

The rating is the Care Quality Commission's. We show it as published and do not change it.

Who runs it

Provider
Shant Ltd
Ownership type
Organisation
Companies House number
15069795 (opens Companies House)

Getting help from Norfolk County Council

The council can assess what care someone needs and tell them what help with the cost they may get.

Checked on the council's website, November 2026.

Common questions

Does Briar House provide nursing care?
No. The Care Quality Commission lists Briar House as a care home without nursing.
How many beds does Briar House have?
The Care Quality Commission's register lists 62 beds at Briar House.
When was Briar House last inspected?
The Care Quality Commission's latest rating for Briar House was published on 21 August 2026.
Who runs Briar House?
Briar House is run by Shant Ltd.
What is Briar House's CQC rating?
Its overall rating from the Care Quality Commission is Requires improvement, published on 21 August 2026.

Contact

Phone
01553 760500
Address
Losinga Road, King's Lynn, PE30 2DQ Map (opens Google Maps)
Read the full inspection report (opens the Care Quality Commission website)

Compare nearby

Nearest rated Good or Outstanding: Kings Lynn Residential Home (Good, 0.4 miles away) and Portland Street (Good, 0.6 miles away).

Nearest care homes:

  1. G
    Kings Lynn Residential Home Good, 0.4 miles away
  2. RI
    Manton House Requires improvement, 0.5 miles away
  3. G
    Portland Street Good, 0.6 miles away
  4. RI
    Faro Lodge Requires improvement, 0.8 miles away
  5. G
    The Mallards Good, 0.9 miles away

See all care homes in Norfolk

See all care homes in King's Lynn