Christopher Grange Residential Care
- Care home
- 78 beds
- No nursing
- Dementia care
- Registered since 2025
- West Derby, Liverpool, North West
Good
Rated on
Rating from the Care Quality Commission.
At a glance
2 ratings
Its last inspection improved it from Inadequate to Good.
2 months
since the latest rating was published.
48 of 76
rated care homes in Liverpool are rated Good, like this one.
Christopher Grange Residential Care: inspection record
Rated Good in August 2026, up from Inadequate.
| 2015 | 2016 | 2017 | 2018 | 2019 | 2020 | 2021 | 2022 | 2023 | 2024 | 2025 | 2026 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Overall | ||||||||||||
| Safe | ||||||||||||
| Effective | ||||||||||||
| Caring | ||||||||||||
| Responsive | ||||||||||||
| Well-led |
Ratings published by the Care Quality Commission.
Compare nearby
- RI Christopher Grange Rhona House Requires improvement, less than 0.1 miles away
- O Mayfield Court Outstanding, 0.1 miles away
- – Paisley Court Not yet rated, 0.4 miles away
- G Ash Court Care Home Good, 0.4 miles away
- RI Finch Manor Nursing Home Requires improvement, 0.6 miles away
What inspectors found
From the Care Quality Commission's assessment published 28 August 2026 (assessment visit 6 May 2026). Quoted under the Open Government Licence.
Date of Assessment: 7 July to 24 July 2026. Christopher Grange is a care home providing accommodation and personal care for up to 78 people, some of whom are living with dementia. At the time of our assessment, 45 people were living at the home.
- Safe Good
- Effective Good
- Caring Good
- Responsive Good
- Well-led Good
Read the rest of CQC's summary
The provider has been in Special Measures since 27 March 2026. This assessment found sufficient improvement for the provider to no longer rated Inadequate overall or in any key question. As a result, the provider will no longer be in Special Measures.
At the previous assessment, the provider was in breach of regulations relating to safe care and treatment, staffing, person-centred care, nutrition and hydration, safeguarding, and governance. During this assessment, we found significant improvements across the home and all previous breaches had been addressed, with the exception of Regulation 12 (Safe Care and Treatment). Although people told us they felt safe and improvements had been made to safeguarding, risk management and oversight, we found medicines and treatments were not always managed safely.
The provider demonstrated a clear commitment to improving the quality and safety of care and had worked hard to address concerns identified at the last assessment. The most significant improvements were seen in leadership, governance and oversight. Strengthened auditing, monitoring and quality assurance systems had improved oversight of care delivery, safeguarding, staffing, environmental risks and people's outcomes. Managers used audits, daily flash meetings, management walkarounds and reviews to identify concerns, monitor performance and drive improvement.
People received effective, caring and person-centred support. Care records demonstrated a good understanding of people's health conditions, communication needs, preferences, routines and life histories. Staff worked closely with healthcare professionals to support people's health and wellbeing, monitor outcomes and respond to changing needs. Improvements made since the last assessment meant people were receiving more consistent support with areas such as nutrition, hydration, personal care, skin integrity and risk management, helping to improve their overall health, wellbeing and quality of life. People were supported to make choices about their daily lives, maintain important relationships and practise their faith. Staff worked collaboratively with people, relatives and professionals to ensure care remained responsive and coordinated.
-
Safe
Good
Safe – this means we looked for evidence people were protected from abuse and avoidable harm. At our last assessment we rated this key question inadequate. At this assessment the rating has changed to good. This meant people were safe and protected from avoidable harm.
However, the provider was in breach of legal regulation safe care and treatment in relation to medicines.
-
Effective
Good
Effective – this means we looked for evidence people’s care, treatment and support achieved good outcomes and promoted a good quality of life, based on best available evidence. At our last assessment we rated this key question inadequate. At this assessment the rating has changed to good.
This meant people’s outcomes were consistently good, and people’s feedback confirmed this.
-
Caring
Good
Caring – this means we looked for evidence the provider involved people and treated them with compassion, kindness, dignity and respect. At our last assessment we rated this key question inadequate. At this assessment the rating has changed to good.
This meant people were supported and treated with dignity and respect; and involved as partners in their care.
-
Responsive
Good
Responsive – this means we looked for evidence the provider met people’s needs.
At our last assessment we rated this key question inadequate. At this assessment the rating has changed to good.
This meant people’s needs were met through good organisation and delivery.
-
Well-led
Good
Well-led – this means we looked for evidence service leadership, management and governance assured high-quality, person-centred care; supported learning and innovation; and promoted an open, fair culture. At our last assessment we rated this key question inadequate. At this assessment the rating has changed to good.
This meant the service was consistently managed and well-led. Leaders and the culture they created promoted high-quality, person-centred care.
Questions to ask when you visit
- Ask to see the most recent Care Quality Commission (CQC) report and what the home did about any points in it.
- Visit at different times of day, including a mealtime.
Registration details
- Registered manager
- Marykutty Sebastian
- Registered with the CQC since
- What it provides
- Care home service without nursing
- Who it supports
- Dementia, Mental Health, Older People
Inspection report
Read the full inspection report (opens the Care Quality Commission website)The rating is the Care Quality Commission's. We show it as published and do not change it.
Who runs it
- Provider
- Christopher Grange Ltd
- Ownership type
- Organisation
- Companies House number
- 16077513 (opens Companies House)
Christopher Grange Ltd runs 2 services, all in the North West. 1 is rated Good or Outstanding and 1 is rated Requires improvement or Inadequate.
Other services run by Christopher Grange Ltd
- RI Christopher Grange Rhona House Requires improvement. Care home with nursing, Liverpool
Getting help from Liverpool City Council
The council can assess what care someone needs and tell them what help with the cost they may get.
- Adult social care at Liverpool City Council
- Ask for a care needs assessment
- Phone: 0151 459 2606
- Support for carers
- Paying for care: Liverpool City Council
Checked on the council's website, November 2026.
Common questions
- Does Christopher Grange Residential Care provide nursing care?
- No. The Care Quality Commission lists Christopher Grange Residential Care as a care home without nursing.
- How many beds does Christopher Grange Residential Care have?
- The Care Quality Commission's register lists 78 beds at Christopher Grange Residential Care.
- When was Christopher Grange Residential Care last inspected?
- The Care Quality Commission's latest rating for Christopher Grange Residential Care was published on 28 August 2026.
- Who runs Christopher Grange Residential Care?
- Christopher Grange Residential Care is run by Christopher Grange Ltd. It runs 2 services, all in the North West.
- What is Christopher Grange Residential Care's CQC rating?
- Its overall rating from the Care Quality Commission is Good, published on 28 August 2026.
Contact
- Phone
- 0151 220 2525
- Address
- Youens Way, East Prescot, Liverpool, L14 2EW Map (opens Google Maps)
Compare nearby
- RI Christopher Grange Rhona House Requires improvement, less than 0.1 miles away
- O Mayfield Court Outstanding, 0.1 miles away
- – Paisley Court Not yet rated, 0.4 miles away
- G Ash Court Care Home Good, 0.4 miles away
- RI Finch Manor Nursing Home Requires improvement, 0.6 miles away