Rated Care Homes

Churchview Care Home

G

Good

Rated on

Rating from the Care Quality Commission.

At a glance

  • 1 rating

    Only one rating on record, so there is no trend to show yet.

  • 3 months

    since the latest rating was published.

  • 234 of 302

    rated care homes in Surrey are rated Good, like this one.

Churchview Care Home: inspection record

Care home with nursing, 78 beds, Surrey

Rated Good in July 2026.

Churchview Care Home: inspection record: inspection ratings by year, 2015 to 2026
201520162017201820192020202120222023202420252026
Overall
Safe
Effective
Caring
Responsive
Well-led

Ratings published by the Care Quality Commission.

Compare nearby

  1. G
    Dimensions 7 Huntley Close Good, 0.3 miles away
  2. G
    Ashford House Good, 0.7 miles away
  3. O
    Hithermoor House Outstanding, 1.4 miles away
  4. –
    Echelforde Not yet rated, 1.5 miles away
  5. G
    The Cedars Care Home Good, 1.7 miles away

See all care homes in Surrey

See all care homes in Ashford

What inspectors found

From the Care Quality Commission's assessment published 3 July 2026 (assessment visit 5 May 2026). Quoted under the Open Government Licence.

Date of assessment: 21 June to 24 June 2026. We visited the service on 21 June 2026. Church View provides purpose-built accommodation and personal care with nursing to up to 78 people in 6 separate units, known as communities. The home provides a service to older people including people living with dementia. At the time of our inspection there were 74 people using the service. This was a comprehensive assessment because the service had been rated inadequate at the last inspection in March 2023 under a different provider. The current provider, Churchview Care Limited, were registered in June 2025. This was the first inspection under this provider.

  • Safe Good
  • Effective Good
  • Caring Good
  • Responsive Good
  • Well-led Good
Read the rest of CQC's summary

People received their medicines safely and as prescribed, and staff received training in medicines management. However, minor shortfalls were identified during the inspection. The provider took prompt action to address these.

Although the home was developed to meet the needs of people living with dementia, there were no sensory or tactile objects for people to touch and explore, and few resting areas in corridors for people to sit when mobilising around the home. The provider said they would address this.

Although safety checks were regularly undertaken, cupboards in kitchen areas of dining rooms containing dishwasher tablets, rinse aid and washing up liquid were unlocked. Following feedback, the provider sourced a more effective locking system to ensure this would not happen again.

Processes to help ensure that risks to people were assessed and mitigated were effective. Staffing levels were adequate to meet people’s needs. The provider used a dependency tool to help ensure there were always enough staff to meet people’s changing needs.

There were good systems to protect people from the risk of infection and cross contamination and staff followed good practice. There were systems in place for the safe recruitment of staff. People were cared for by staff who were kind and caring and knew them well. The home was clean, fresh and well-maintained.

There was a range of activities available for people and these were person-centred. People and their relatives were involved in their pre-admission assessment, care planning and the management of individual risks. Staff received regular training and had their competencies checked. People’s end of life wishes had been considered and documented. Staff spoke favourably of the management team and felt listened to and consulted.

There was a good culture at the service. Staff and management put people’s needs at the centre of the care and support they provided. The provider was keen to learn and develop the home to benefit people and increase their wellbeing.

  1. Safe

    Good

    Safe – this means we looked for evidence that people were protected from abuse and avoidable harm.

    This is the first assessment for this newly registered service. This key question has been rated good.

    This meant people were safe and protected from avoidable harm.

  2. Effective

    Good

    Effective – this means we looked for evidence that people’s care, treatment and support achieved good outcomes and promoted a good quality of life, based on best available evidence.

    This is the first assessment for this newly registered service. This key question has been rated good.

    This meant people’s outcomes were consistently good, and people’s feedback confirmed this.

  3. Caring

    Good

    Caring – this means we looked for evidence that the provider involved people and treated them with compassion, kindness, dignity and respect.

    This is the first assessment for this newly registered service. This key question has been rated good.

    This meant people were supported and treated with dignity and respect; and involved as partners in their care.

  4. Responsive

    Good

    Responsive – this means we looked for evidence that the provider met people’s needs.

    This is the first assessment for this newly registered service. This key question has been rated good.

    This meant people’s needs were met through good organisation and delivery.

  5. Well-led

    Good

    Well-led – this means we looked for evidence that service leadership, management and governance assured high-quality, person-centred care; supported learning and innovation; and promoted an open, fair culture.

    This is the first assessment for this newly registered service. This key question has been rated good.

    This meant the service was consistently managed and well-led. Leaders and the culture they created promoted high-quality, person-centred care.

Questions to ask when you visit

  1. Ask how nursing cover works at night and at weekends.
  2. Ask to see the most recent Care Quality Commission (CQC) report and what the home did about any points in it.
  3. Visit at different times of day, including a mealtime.

Registration details

Registered manager
Rohan Patel
Registered with the CQC since
What it provides
Care home service with nursing
Who it supports
Dementia, Mental Health, Older People, Physical Disability, Younger Adults

Inspection report

Read the full inspection report (opens the Care Quality Commission website)

The rating is the Care Quality Commission's. We show it as published and do not change it.

Who runs it

Ownership type
Organisation
Companies House number
05993142 (opens Companies House)

Getting help from Surrey County Council

The council can assess what care someone needs and tell them what help with the cost they may get.

Checked on the council's website, November 2026.

Common questions

Does Churchview Care Home provide nursing care?
Yes. The Care Quality Commission lists Churchview Care Home as a care home with nursing.
How many beds does Churchview Care Home have?
The Care Quality Commission's register lists 78 beds at Churchview Care Home.
When was Churchview Care Home last inspected?
The Care Quality Commission's latest rating for Churchview Care Home was published on 3 July 2026.
Who runs Churchview Care Home?
Churchview Care Home is run by Churchview Care Ltd.
What is Churchview Care Home's CQC rating?
Its overall rating from the Care Quality Commission is Good, published on 3 July 2026.

Contact

Phone
01784 248610
Address
Falcon Drive, Stanwell, Staines-upon-thames, TW19 7EU Map (opens Google Maps)
Read the full inspection report (opens the Care Quality Commission website)

Compare nearby

  1. G
    Dimensions 7 Huntley Close Good, 0.3 miles away
  2. G
    Ashford House Good, 0.7 miles away
  3. O
    Hithermoor House Outstanding, 1.4 miles away
  4. –
    Echelforde Not yet rated, 1.5 miles away
  5. G
    The Cedars Care Home Good, 1.7 miles away

See all care homes in Surrey

See all care homes in Ashford