Rated Care Homes

Westwood Lodge Care Home

RI

Requires improvement

Rated on

Rating from the Care Quality Commission.

At a glance

  • 5 ratings

    Its last inspection moved it down from Good to Requires improvement.

  • 10 months

    since the latest rating was published.

  • 5 of 62

    rated care homes in Newcastle upon Tyne are rated Requires improvement, like this one.

Westwood Lodge Care Home: inspection record

Care home with nursing, 44 beds, Newcastle upon Tyne

Rated Requires improvement in December 2025, down from Good.

Westwood Lodge Care Home: inspection record: inspection ratings by year, 2015 to 2026
201520162017201820192020202120222023202420252026
Overall
Safe
Effective
Caring
Responsive
Well-led

Ratings published by the Care Quality Commission.

Compare nearby

Nearest rated Good or Outstanding: Lynnwood (Good, 0.1 miles away) and Orchard Mews (Good, 0.2 miles away).

Nearest care homes:

  1. G
    Lynnwood Good, 0.1 miles away
  2. G
    Orchard Mews Good, 0.2 miles away
  3. O
    Tyne Grange Outstanding, 0.2 miles away
  4. G
    St Joseph's - Newcastle Good, 0.4 miles away
  5. –
    Willow Park Not yet rated, 0.4 miles away

See all care homes in Newcastle upon Tyne

See all care homes in Elswick

What inspectors found

From the Care Quality Commission's assessment published 16 December 2025 (assessment visit 4 September 2025). Quoted under the Open Government Licence.

Date of assessment: 22 October to 20 November 2025.

Westwood Lodge is a care home providing accommodation, personal and nursing care to a maximum of 44 younger and older people, including people who may live with dementia or mental health needs. At the time of our unannounced visit, 42 people were using the service.

  • Safe No rating
  • Effective Good
  • Caring Good
  • Responsive No rating
  • Well-led No rating
Read the rest of CQC's summary

The inspection took place to assess if improvements had been made since the last inspection. Breaches in regulation had been previously identified in relation to safe care and treatment, person-centred care, premises and equipment and governance.

Since the last inspection a registered manager was in place. The registered manager is registered with the Commission and is legally responsible to ensure that the service is compliant with legal and regulatory requirements. The registered manager, supported by the management team, was making improvements to the service.

At this inspection we found improvements had been made. However further improvements were still required to the management of medicines, infection control, people’s dining experience, care records, person-centred care and governance.

People received safe care, however due to improvements needed to medicine management, records and governance there was 1 breach of legal regulation in relation to records and governance.

The governance system required improvement as audits had not always identified where improvements were needed to care provision, as identified at inspection, to ensure the improvements were made in an effective and timely way.

More effective systems were now in place to protect people from abuse. Staff assessed and mitigated most risks. Improvements had been made to staff recruitment to ensure suitable staff were employed.

Some improvements had been made to medicine management, but further improvements were required to medicine records. Improvements were being made to care records, however further improvements were needed to help ensure people received person-centred care.

Staffing levels were sufficient, staff felt safe and supported, and improvements had been made under the manager's leadership to keep people safe, including safeguarding processes, appropriate deprivation of liberty safeguards, and systems for accident and incident analysis with lessons learned cascaded to staff.

Staff received appropriate training and worked with other professionals to ensure people’s needs were met in a safe and timely way. Staff treated people with kindness and compassion. However, we discussed with the registered manager the improvements that were needed with how staff engaged with people.

The staff team knew people well and provided support discreetly and with compassion. People’s privacy was respected, and people were supported to maintain contact with relatives and friends.

The environment was becoming better maintained to keep people safe, however areas of the home were still showing signs of wear and tear. Some improvements were still needed to infection prevention and control; this was being addressed as part of the refurbishment programme.

We also signposted the provider to ensure that information was available in an accessible format to keep people informed and involved in decision making.

We have asked the provider for an action plan in response to the concerns found at this inspection.

  1. Safe

    No rating

    Safe – this means we looked for evidence that people were protected from abuse and avoidable harm. ​ At our last inspection we rated this key question inadequate. At this inspection the rating has changed to requires improvement. This meant some aspects of the service were not always safe and there was limited assurance about safety. There was an increased risk that people could be harmed.

    The breaches of safe care and treatment and premises and equipment from the last inspection have been closed as sufficient improvements had been made. However, at this inspection the service was in breach of legal regulations in relation to medicine management and record keeping.

  2. Effective

    Good

    Effective – this means we looked for evidence that people’s care, treatment and support achieved good outcomes and promoted a good quality of life, based on best available evidence.

    At our last inspection we rated this key question requires improvement. At this inspection the rating has changed to good. This meant people’s outcomes were consistently good, and people’s feedback confirmed this.

  3. Caring

    Good

    Caring – this means we looked for evidence that the service involved people and treated them with compassion, kindness, dignity and respect.

    At our last inspection we rated this key question good. At this inspection the rating has remained good. This meant people were supported and treated with dignity and respect; and were involved as partners in their care.

  4. Responsive

    No rating

    Responsive – this means we looked for evidence that the service met people’s needs.

    At our last inspection we rated this key question requires improvement. At this inspection the rating has remained requires improvement. This meant people’s needs were not always met.

  5. Well-led

    No rating

    Well-led – this means we looked for evidence that service leadership, management and governance assured high-quality, person-centred care; supported learning and innovation; and promoted an open, fair culture.

    At our last inspection we rated this key question requires improvement. At this inspection the rating has remained requires improvement. This meant management and leadership was inconsistent. Leaders and the culture they created did not always support the delivery of high-quality, person-centred care. The provider was in breach of the legal regulation relating to good governance and records.

Questions to ask when you visit

  1. Safe was rated Requires improvement on 16 December 2025. Ask how medicines are managed, how staffing levels are decided and how incidents are reviewed.
  2. Responsive was rated Requires improvement on 16 December 2025. Ask to see how care plans are kept up to date, how complaints are handled and what activities are on offer.
  3. Well-led was rated Requires improvement on 16 December 2025. Ask about changes in management and what has changed since the report.
  4. Ask how nursing cover works at night and at weekends.

Registration details

Registered with the CQC since
What it provides
Care home service with nursing
Who it supports
Dementia, Mental Health, Older People, Younger Adults

Inspection report

Read the full inspection report (opens the Care Quality Commission website)

7 inspection reports, latest 11 February 2022. Latest assessment published 16 December 2025; the Care Quality Commission's newer assessments are published on its website rather than as reports.

The rating is the Care Quality Commission's. We show it as published and do not change it.

Who runs it

Ownership type
Organisation
Companies House number
09704460 (opens Companies House)

Getting help from Newcastle City Council

The council can assess what care someone needs and tell them what help with the cost they may get.

Checked on the council's website, November 2026.

Common questions

Does Westwood Lodge Care Home provide nursing care?
Yes. The Care Quality Commission lists Westwood Lodge Care Home as a care home with nursing.
How many beds does Westwood Lodge Care Home have?
The Care Quality Commission's register lists 44 beds at Westwood Lodge Care Home.
When was Westwood Lodge Care Home last inspected?
The Care Quality Commission's latest rating for Westwood Lodge Care Home was published on 16 December 2025.
Who runs Westwood Lodge Care Home?
Westwood Lodge Care Home is run by Westwood Lodge Ltd.
What is Westwood Lodge Care Home's CQC rating?
Its overall rating from the Care Quality Commission is Requires improvement, published on 16 December 2025.

Contact

Address
7 Bentinck Villas, Newcastle Upon Tyne, NE4 6UR Map (opens Google Maps)
Read the full inspection report (opens the Care Quality Commission website)

Compare nearby

Nearest rated Good or Outstanding: Lynnwood (Good, 0.1 miles away) and Orchard Mews (Good, 0.2 miles away).

Nearest care homes:

  1. G
    Lynnwood Good, 0.1 miles away
  2. G
    Orchard Mews Good, 0.2 miles away
  3. O
    Tyne Grange Outstanding, 0.2 miles away
  4. G
    St Joseph's - Newcastle Good, 0.4 miles away
  5. –
    Willow Park Not yet rated, 0.4 miles away

See all care homes in Newcastle upon Tyne

See all care homes in Elswick