Rated Care Homes

Westerfield House Care Ltd

G

Good

Rated on

Rating from the Care Quality Commission.

At a glance

  • 2 ratings

    Rated Good at every inspection since 2017.

  • 8 months

    since the latest rating was published.

  • 109 of 156

    rated care homes in Suffolk are rated Good, like this one.

Westerfield House Care Ltd: inspection record

Care home, 37 beds, Suffolk

Rated Good in February 2026.

Westerfield House Care Ltd: inspection record: inspection ratings by year, 2015 to 2026
201520162017201820192020202120222023202420252026
Overall
Safe
Effective
Caring
Responsive
Well-led

Ratings published by the Care Quality Commission.

Compare nearby

  1. G
    Sidegate Lane Care Home Good, 0.5 miles away
  2. G
    Fairways Good, 0.8 miles away
  3. O
    Montrose House Outstanding, 0.9 miles away
  4. G
    Chrissian Residential Home Limited Good, 1.2 miles away
  5. –
    COLCHESTER ROAD RESIDENTIAL Not yet rated, 1.3 miles away

See all care homes in Suffolk

See all care homes in Westerfield

What inspectors found

From the Care Quality Commission's assessment published 20 February 2026 (assessment visit 31 December 2025). Quoted under the Open Government Licence.

Date of Assessment: 14 and 15 January 2026. Westerfield House Care Ltd is a residential care home providing support to up to 37 older people and younger adults living with dementia, physical disabilities and sensory impairment. At the time of our inspection visits, there were 30 people using the service. This comprehensive inspection was prompted by a review of the information we held about this service, including the length of time since the last rating.

  • Safe Good
  • Effective Good
  • Caring Good
  • Responsive Good
  • Well-led Good
Read the rest of CQC's summary

The provider had a good learning culture and people could raise concerns. Managers investigated incidents and measures put in place to reduce them happening again. Systems were in place to reduce risks of abuse and avoidable harm. The facilities and equipment met people’s needs, were clean and well-maintained and any risks mitigated. Staffing levels were kept under review and staff received training relevant to their role. Staff managed medicines well and safely.

People were involved in assessments of their needs, and these were used to inform care plans, which were kept under review. Care was based on latest evidence and good practice. Staff worked with agencies involved in people’s care for the best outcomes and smooth transitions when moving services. Staff monitored people’s health to support healthy living, including ensuring people had enough to eat and drink. Staff made sure people understood their care and treatment to enable them to give informed consent.

Staff treated people with kindness and compassion and protected their privacy and dignity. They treated them as individuals and supported their preferences. Staff responded to people in a timely way. The provider supported staff wellbeing.

People’s care records included guidance for staff in how their person-centred care was to be provided. The service was easy to access and worked to eliminate discrimination. People’s preferences were sought and documented, including their end-of-life decisions. There was a complaints procedure in place and concerns were investigated, responded to and used to improve the service.

Leaders and staff had a shared vision and culture based on listening, learning and trust. Leaders were visible, knowledgeable and supportive, helping staff develop in their roles. Staff understood their roles and responsibilities and felt supported to give feedback. Managers worked with the local community to deliver the best possible care and were receptive to new ideas. There was a culture of continuous improvement with staff given time and resources to try new ideas.

  1. Safe

    Good

    Safe – this means we looked for evidence that people were protected from abuse and avoidable harm.

    At our last assessment we rated this key question good. At this assessment the rating has remained good. This meant people were safe and protected from avoidable harm.

  2. Effective

    Good

    Effective – this means we looked for evidence that people’s care, treatment and support achieved good outcomes and promoted a good quality of life, based on best available evidence.

    At our last assessment we rated this key question good. At this assessment the rating has remained good. This meant people’s outcomes were consistently good, and people’s feedback confirmed this.

  3. Caring

    Good

    Caring – this means we looked for evidence that the provider involved people and treated them with compassion, kindness, dignity and respect.

    At our last assessment we rated this key question good. At this assessment the rating has remained good. This meant people were supported and treated with dignity and respect; and involved as partners in their care.

  4. Responsive

    Good

    Responsive – this means we looked for evidence that the provider met people’s needs.

    At our last assessment we rated this key question good. At this assessment the rating has remained good. This meant people’s needs were met through good organisation and delivery.

  5. Well-led

    Good

    Well-led – this means we looked for evidence that service leadership, management and governance assured high-quality, person-centred care; supported learning and innovation; and promoted an open, fair culture.

    At our last assessment we rated this key question good. At this assessment the rating has remained good. This meant the service was consistently managed and well-led. Leaders and the culture they created promoted high-quality, person-centred care.

Questions to ask when you visit

  1. Ask to see the most recent Care Quality Commission (CQC) report and what the home did about any points in it.
  2. Visit at different times of day, including a mealtime.

Registration details

Registered manager
Louise Coote
Registered with the CQC since
What it provides
Care home service without nursing
Who it supports
Dementia, Older People, Physical Disability, Sensory Impairment, Younger Adults

Inspection report

Read the full inspection report (opens the Care Quality Commission website)

2 inspection reports, latest 25 December 2020. Latest assessment published 20 February 2026; the Care Quality Commission's newer assessments are published on its website rather than as reports.

The rating is the Care Quality Commission's. We show it as published and do not change it.

Who runs it

Ownership type
Organisation
Companies House number
9697800 (opens Companies House)

Getting help from Suffolk County Council

The council can assess what care someone needs and tell them what help with the cost they may get.

Checked on the council's website, November 2026.

Common questions

Does Westerfield House Care Ltd provide nursing care?
No. The Care Quality Commission lists Westerfield House Care Ltd as a care home without nursing.
How many beds does Westerfield House Care Ltd have?
The Care Quality Commission's register lists 37 beds at Westerfield House Care Ltd.
When was Westerfield House Care Ltd last inspected?
The Care Quality Commission's latest rating for Westerfield House Care Ltd was published on 20 February 2026.
Who runs Westerfield House Care Ltd?
Westerfield House Care Ltd is run by Westerfield House Care Ltd.
What is Westerfield House Care Ltd's CQC rating?
Its overall rating from the Care Quality Commission is Good, published on 20 February 2026.

Contact

Phone
01473 232974
Address
Westerfield House, Humber Doucy Lane, Ipswich, IP4 3QG Map (opens Google Maps)
Read the full inspection report (opens the Care Quality Commission website)

Compare nearby

  1. G
    Sidegate Lane Care Home Good, 0.5 miles away
  2. G
    Fairways Good, 0.8 miles away
  3. O
    Montrose House Outstanding, 0.9 miles away
  4. G
    Chrissian Residential Home Limited Good, 1.2 miles away
  5. –
    COLCHESTER ROAD RESIDENTIAL Not yet rated, 1.3 miles away

See all care homes in Suffolk

See all care homes in Westerfield