Rated Care Homes

Oliver Court

G

Good

Rated on

Rating from the Care Quality Commission.

At a glance

  • 1 rating

    Only one rating on record, so there is no trend to show yet.

  • 9 years

    since the latest rating was published. A rating this old may not show how the service is today.

  • 173 of 288

    rated care homes in Norfolk are rated Good, like this one.

Oliver Court: inspection record

Care home, 34 beds, Norfolk

Rated Good in November 2017.

Oliver Court: inspection record: inspection ratings by year, 2015 to 2026
201520162017201820192020202120222023202420252026
Overall
Safe
Effective
Caring
Responsive
Well-led

Ratings published by the Care Quality Commission.

Compare nearby

  1. I
    Florence House Inadequate, 0.1 miles away
  2. G
    Park House Good, 0.2 miles away
  3. RI
    St Davids Residential Care Home Requires improvement, 0.3 miles away
  4. G
    Mill Lodge Good, 0.6 miles away
  5. G
    Marine Court Residential Home Good, 0.7 miles away

See all care homes in Norfolk

See all care homes in Great Yarmouth

What inspectors found

From the Care Quality Commission's inspection report published 7 November 2017. Quoted under the Open Government Licence.

Oliver Court is a residential home that provides care, support and accommodation for up to 24 people who have mental health support needs. At the time of our inspection there were 24 people living in the home. The inspection took place on 12 September 2017, and was unannounced.

Read the rest of CQC's summary

There was a registered manager in post. A registered manager is a person who has registered with the Care Quality Commission to manage the service. Like registered providers, they are 'registered persons'. Registered persons have legal responsibility for meeting the requirements in the Health and Social Care Act 2008 and associated Regulations about how the service is run.

Clear and accurate records were not always being kept of medicines administered by staff. Guidance in relation to 'as required' medicines needed to be clearer to ensure staff knew when to give these. Storage for temperature sensitive medicines required improvement; there was not a designated fridge for these types of medicines.

Activity provision was provided by staff working in the service. However, some feedback suggested this was not always meeting the individual or specialist needs of people on a day to day basis.

When people moved between services, processes for sharing relevant information with others needed to be more robust, particularly in relation to known risks. The registered manager took prompt action to rectify this.

Staffing levels needed to be reviewed to take account of people's changing needs.

Care plans were developed and maintained for people who used the service. Care plans covered support needs and personal preferences. Plans were reviewed and updated at regular intervals and information was sought from appropriate professionals as and when required.

Risk assessments were in place to help protect people from avoidable harm. Assessments contained detailed guidance for staff about how to minimise the risk of harm whilst protecting people's rights and freedoms.

The service acted in accordance with the Mental Capacity Act 2005 (MCA) when necessary. People were supported to make their own choices and this was reflected in their care records.

Staff had been trained in safeguarding topics. The registered manager had a good understanding of safeguarding processes and followed these in practice. Thorough recruitment processes were followed before staff started work. This reduced the risk of unsuitable people being employed.

People were supported by well trained, skilled staff. Staff supervision and meetings were taking place, which

meant staff had the opportunity to reflect on and develop their practice. Training was provided for staff to enable them to carry out tasks effectively.

People were supported to seek and attend healthcare support as required to promote their health.

There was a complaints process in place. Feedback from people, relatives and others was responded to, analysed, and actions taken were logged.

The registered manager and provider had implemented a range of assurance systems to monitor the quality and effectiveness of the service provided. This included an annual assessment undertaken by an independent consultant. Systems were in place to seek feedback from all people who used the service as a means to develop and improve service delivery.

Staff were positive about ways in which the service was managed and the support received from the management team. The registered manager was described as approachable and part of the team; they promoted the values of the service and we saw that they led by example.

The five questions we ask about services and what we found

Questions to ask when you visit

  1. Safe was rated Requires improvement on 7 November 2017. Ask how medicines are managed, how staffing levels are decided and how incidents are reviewed.
  2. The last rating is 9 years old. Ask what has changed since then.
  3. Ask to see the most recent Care Quality Commission (CQC) report and what the home did about any points in it.

Registration details

Registered manager
Jacob Street
Registered with the CQC since
What it provides
Care home service without nursing
Who it supports
Mental Health, Younger Adults

Inspection report

Read the full inspection report (opens the Care Quality Commission website)

1 inspection report, latest 7 November 2017. The reports are on the Care Quality Commission website.

The rating is the Care Quality Commission's. We show it as published and do not change it.

Who runs it

Provider
Oliver Court LimitedBrand: J and J Matheron
Ownership type
Organisation
Companies House number
09270251 (opens Companies House)

Getting help from Norfolk County Council

The council can assess what care someone needs and tell them what help with the cost they may get.

Checked on the council's website, November 2026.

Common questions

Does Oliver Court provide nursing care?
No. The Care Quality Commission lists Oliver Court as a care home without nursing.
How many beds does Oliver Court have?
The Care Quality Commission's register lists 34 beds at Oliver Court.
When was Oliver Court last inspected?
The Care Quality Commission's latest rating for Oliver Court was published on 7 November 2017.
Who runs Oliver Court?
Oliver Court is run by Oliver Court Limited.
What is Oliver Court's CQC rating?
Its overall rating from the Care Quality Commission is Good, published on 7 November 2017.

Contact

Phone
01493 332552
Address
Bath Hill Terrace, Great Yarmouth, NR30 2LF Map (opens Google Maps)
Read the full inspection report (opens the Care Quality Commission website)

Compare nearby

  1. I
    Florence House Inadequate, 0.1 miles away
  2. G
    Park House Good, 0.2 miles away
  3. RI
    St Davids Residential Care Home Requires improvement, 0.3 miles away
  4. G
    Mill Lodge Good, 0.6 miles away
  5. G
    Marine Court Residential Home Good, 0.7 miles away

See all care homes in Norfolk

See all care homes in Great Yarmouth