Rated Care Homes

Penniston Barn

RI

Requires improvement

Rated on

Rating from the Care Quality Commission.

At a glance

  • 6 ratings

    Its last inspection moved it down from Good to Requires improvement.

  • 3 months

    since the latest rating was published.

  • 15 of 57

    rated care homes in Central Bedfordshire are rated Requires improvement, like this one.

Penniston Barn: inspection record

Care home, 6 beds, Central Bedfordshire

Rated Requires improvement in July 2026, down from Good.

Penniston Barn: inspection record: inspection ratings by year, 2015 to 2026
201520162017201820192020202120222023202420252026
Overall
Safe
Effective
Caring
Responsive
Well-led

Ratings published by the Care Quality Commission.

Compare nearby

Nearest rated Good or Outstanding: The Grove -2 (Good, 0.7 miles away) and The Grove -4 (Good, 0.7 miles away).

Nearest care homes:

  1. RI
    The Bungalow Requires improvement, less than 0.1 miles away
  2. I
    Woodland House Inadequate, less than 0.1 miles away
  3. G
    The Grove -2 Good, 0.7 miles away
  4. G
    The Grove -4 Good, 0.7 miles away
  5. RI
    The Grove -6 Requires improvement, 0.7 miles away

See all care homes in Central Bedfordshire

See all care homes in Tingrith

What inspectors found

From the Care Quality Commission's assessment published 31 July 2026 (assessment visit 8 May 2026). Quoted under the Open Government Licence.

Date of assessment: 26 May 2026 to 30 June 2026.

Penniston Barn is a care home providing accommodation and personal care to people with a learning disability and autistic people. At the time of our assessment, 6 people were living at the service.

  • Safe No rating
  • Effective No rating
  • Caring Good
  • Responsive No rating
  • Well-led No rating
Read the rest of CQC's summary

We assessed the service against 'Right support, right care, right culture' guidance to make judgements about whether the provider guaranteed people with a learning disability and autistic people respect, equality, dignity, choices, independence and good access to local communities that most people take for granted.

Risks associated with the environment, medicines management and premises maintenance had not always been effectively identified, assessed or mitigated. Governance systems and provider oversight had not been sufficiently effective in identifying and addressing concerns, including issues relating to environmental safety, infection prevention and control, medicines storage and aspects of fire safety. We also found inconsistencies within care planning documentation and limited evidence that incidents and events were routinely analysed to identify trends, learning and opportunities for improvement.

Records did not consistently demonstrate that people's rights, choices and preferences had been fully considered when planning and reviewing care. Opportunities to plan for future care needs and life events had also not always been explored.

However, people received kind and compassionate support from staff who knew them well. Staff demonstrated a good understanding of people's individual needs, communication styles and behaviours and were able to respond proactively to reduce distress and promote wellbeing.

People were supported to develop independence, maintain important life skills and participate in activities that were meaningful to them. They were encouraged to engage in cooking, shopping, gardening, household tasks and a wide range of community-based activities. Staff worked alongside health and social care professionals to support people's wellbeing and positive outcomes.

We identified 2 breaches of the legal regulations in relation to safe environments and governance.

In instances where CQC has begun a process of regulatory action, we may publish this information on our website after any representations and/or appeals have been concluded, if the action has been taken forward.

  1. Safe

    No rating

    Safe – this means we looked for evidence that people were protected from abuse and avoidable harm. At our last assessment we rated this key questiongood. At thisassessmentthe rating has changed torequires improvement.This meant some aspects of the service were not always safe and there was limited assurance about safety. There was an increased risk that people could be harmed.

    The service was in breach of legal regulation in relationsafeenvironments.

  2. Effective

    No rating

    Effective – this means we looked for evidence that people’s care,treatmentand support achieved good outcomes and promoteda good qualityof life, based on best available evidence.

    At our last assessment we rated this key questionoutstanding. At thisassessmentthe rating has changed torequires improvement.This meant the effectiveness of people’s care, treatment and support did not always achieve good outcomes or was inconsistent.

  3. Caring

    Good

    Caring – this means we looked for evidence that the provider involved people and treated them with compassion, kindness,dignityand respect.

    At our last assessment we rated this key questiongood. At thisassessmentthe rating hasremainedgood.This meant people were supported and treated with dignity and respect; and involved as partners in their care.

  4. Responsive

    No rating

    Responsive – this means we looked for evidence that the provider met people’s needs.

    At our last assessment we rated this key questiongood. At thisassessmentthe rating has changed torequires improvement.This meant people’s needs were not always met.

  5. Well-led

    No rating

    Well-led – this means we looked for evidence that service leadership, management and governance assured high-quality, person-centred care; supported learning and innovation; and promoted an open, fair culture.

    At our last assessment we rated this key questiongood. At thisassessmentthe rating has changed torequires improvement.This meant the management and leadership was inconsistent. Leaders and the culture they created did not always support the delivery of high-quality, person-centred care.

    The service was in breach of legal regulation in relation to governance at the service.

Questions to ask when you visit

  1. Safe was rated Requires improvement on 31 July 2026. Ask how medicines are managed, how staffing levels are decided and how incidents are reviewed.
  2. Effective was rated Requires improvement on 31 July 2026. Ask about staff training and how health appointments are arranged.
  3. Responsive was rated Requires improvement on 31 July 2026. Ask to see how care plans are kept up to date, how complaints are handled and what activities are on offer.
  4. Well-led was rated Requires improvement on 31 July 2026. Ask about changes in management and what has changed since the report.

Registration details

Registered with the CQC since
What it provides
Care home service without nursing
Who it supports
Learning disabilities or autistic spectrum disorder, Younger Adults

Inspection report

Read the full inspection report (opens the Care Quality Commission website)

9 inspection reports, latest 15 April 2021. Latest assessment published 31 July 2026; the Care Quality Commission's newer assessments are published on its website rather than as reports.

The rating is the Care Quality Commission's. We show it as published and do not change it.

Who runs it

Ownership type
Organisation
Companies House number
06463952 (opens Companies House)

Really Flexible Care Ltd runs 11 services, all in the East of England. 4 are rated Good or Outstanding, 4 are rated Requires improvement or Inadequate and 3 have no rating yet.

Other services run by Really Flexible Care Ltd

  1. G
    Avon's House Good. Care home, Bedford
  2. G
    Bromham House Good. Care home, Bedford
  3. G
    Cinnamon Lodge Good. Care home, Central Bedfordshire
  4. G
    St Georges House Good. Care home, Bedford

See all 11 services run by Really Flexible Care Ltd

Getting help from Central Bedfordshire Council

The council can assess what care someone needs and tell them what help with the cost they may get.

Checked on the council's website, November 2026.

Common questions

Does Penniston Barn provide nursing care?
No. The Care Quality Commission lists Penniston Barn as a care home without nursing.
How many beds does Penniston Barn have?
The Care Quality Commission's register lists 6 beds at Penniston Barn.
When was Penniston Barn last inspected?
The Care Quality Commission's latest rating for Penniston Barn was published on 31 July 2026.
Who runs Penniston Barn?
Penniston Barn is run by Really Flexible Care Ltd. It runs 11 services, all in the East of England.
What is Penniston Barn's CQC rating?
Its overall rating from the Care Quality Commission is Requires improvement, published on 31 July 2026.

Contact

Phone
01525 873265
Address
Wadelow Grange, Wood End, Tingrith, Milton Keynes, MK17 9ER Map (opens Google Maps)
Read the full inspection report (opens the Care Quality Commission website)

Compare nearby

Nearest rated Good or Outstanding: The Grove -2 (Good, 0.7 miles away) and The Grove -4 (Good, 0.7 miles away).

Nearest care homes:

  1. RI
    The Bungalow Requires improvement, less than 0.1 miles away
  2. I
    Woodland House Inadequate, less than 0.1 miles away
  3. G
    The Grove -2 Good, 0.7 miles away
  4. G
    The Grove -4 Good, 0.7 miles away
  5. RI
    The Grove -6 Requires improvement, 0.7 miles away

See all care homes in Central Bedfordshire

See all care homes in Tingrith