Rated Care Homes

95 Ashley Avenue

G

Good

Rated on

Rating from the Care Quality Commission.

At a glance

  • 1 rating

    Only one rating on record, so there is no trend to show yet.

  • 7 years

    since the latest rating was published. A rating this old may not show how the service is today.

  • 332 of 445

    rated care homes in Kent are rated Good, like this one.

95 Ashley Avenue: inspection record

Care home, 5 beds, Kent

Rated Good in September 2019.

95 Ashley Avenue: inspection record: inspection ratings by year, 2015 to 2026
201520162017201820192020202120222023202420252026
Overall
Safe
Effective
Caring
Responsive
Well-led

Ratings published by the Care Quality Commission.

Compare nearby

  1. G
    Blythson Limited - 3 Ashley Avenue Good, 0.2 miles away
  2. G
    Blythson Limited - 5 Ashley Avenue Good, 0.2 miles away
  3. G
    Cumbria House Care Home Good, 0.8 miles away
  4. G
    The Grange Care Home Good, 0.8 miles away
  5. G
    Finn Farm Lodge Good, 0.8 miles away

See all care homes in Kent

See all care homes in Sandgate

What inspectors found

From the Care Quality Commission's inspection report published 6 September 2019. Quoted under the Open Government Licence.

This inspection took place on 30 August 2018 and was our first inspection of this service. The inspection was announced.

Read the rest of CQC's summary

95 Ashley Avenue is a 'care home'. People in care homes receive accommodation and nursing or personal care as single package under one contractual agreement. CQC regulates both the premises and the care provided, and both were looked at during this inspection.

95 Ashley Avenue is registered to accommodate up to five people in a two-storey house, although the service had been set up to accommodate two people at the present time. At the time of our inspection one person was living at the service. People were not able to communicate their feedback and experiences verbally of living at the service.

The care service has been developed and designed in line with the values that underpin the 'Registering the Right Support' and other best practice guidance. These values include choice, promotion of independence and inclusion. People with learning disabilities and autism using the service can live as ordinary a life as any citizen.

The service had a registered manager in post. A registered manager is a person who has registered with the Care Quality Commission to manage the service. Like registered providers, they are 'registered persons'. Registered persons have legal responsibility for meeting the requirements in the Health and Social Care Act 2008 and associated Regulations about how the service is run.

People were safeguarded from situations in which they may experience abuse including financial mistreatment. People had been helped to avoid preventable accidents while their freedom was respected. Medicines were managed safely and background checks had been completed before new care staff had been appointed. Suitable arrangements were in place to prevent and control infection. Accidents and incidents were reviewed and analysed by managers to reduce the chance of recurrence.

Care was delivered in a way that promoted positive outcomes for people and staff had the knowledge and skills they needed to provide support in line with legislation and guidance. This included respecting people's citizenship rights under the Equality Act 2010. People were supported to eat and drink enough to have a balanced diet to promote their good health. Suitable steps had been taken to ensure that people received coordinated care when they used or moved between different services. People had been supported to access any healthcare services they needed. The accommodation was designed, adapted and decorated to meet people's needs and expectations.

People were supported to have maximum choice and control of their lives. In addition, the registered persons had taken the necessary steps to ensure that people only received lawful care that was the least restrictive possible.

People were treated with kindness and they had been given emotional support when needed. They had also been helped to express their views and be actively involved in making decisions about their care as far as possible. This included them having access to lay advocates if necessary. The service had not supported anyone at the end of their life. Confidential information was kept private.

People received person-centred care that promoted their independence. This included them having access to information that was presented to them in an accessible way. People were given opportunities to pursue their hobbies and interests. The registered manager and care staff recognised the importance of promoting equality and diversity. Suitable arrangements were in place to resolve complaints in order to improve the quality of care.

The registered manager had promoted a person-centred culture in the service and had made the arrangements necessary to ensure that regulatory requirements were met. People who lived in the service and members of staff were actively engaged in developing the service. There were systems and procedures to enable the service to learn, improve and assure its sustainability. The registered persons were actively working in partnership with other agencies to support the development of joined-up care.

The five questions we ask about services and what we found

Questions to ask when you visit

  1. The last rating is 7 years old. Ask what has changed since then.
  2. Ask to see the most recent Care Quality Commission (CQC) report and what the home did about any points in it.
  3. Visit at different times of day, including a mealtime.

Registration details

Registered manager
Louise Catanach
Registered with the CQC since
What it provides
Care home service without nursing
Who it supports
Learning disabilities or autistic spectrum disorder, Mental Health, Older People, Physical Disability, Younger Adults

Inspection report

Read the full inspection report (opens the Care Quality Commission website)

1 inspection report, latest 6 September 2019. The reports are on the Care Quality Commission website.

The rating is the Care Quality Commission's. We show it as published and do not change it.

Who runs it

Provider
CLBD Limited
Ownership type
Organisation
Companies House number
08778341 (opens Companies House)

CLBD Limited runs 12 services, all in the South East. 9 are rated Good or Outstanding and 3 have no rating yet.

Other services run by CLBD Limited

  1. G
    24 Seabrook Road Good. Care home, Kent
  2. G
    26 Seabrook Road Good. Care home, Kent
  3. G
    6a Sheerstone Good. Care home, Kent
  4. G
    Burham Court Good. Home care, Kent

See all 12 services run by CLBD Limited

Getting help from Kent County Council

The council can assess what care someone needs and tell them what help with the cost they may get.

Checked on the council's website, November 2026.

Common questions

Does 95 Ashley Avenue provide nursing care?
No. The Care Quality Commission lists 95 Ashley Avenue as a care home without nursing.
How many beds does 95 Ashley Avenue have?
The Care Quality Commission's register lists 5 beds at 95 Ashley Avenue.
When was 95 Ashley Avenue last inspected?
The Care Quality Commission's latest rating for 95 Ashley Avenue was published on 6 September 2019.
Who runs 95 Ashley Avenue?
95 Ashley Avenue is run by CLBD Limited. It runs 12 services, all in the South East.
What is 95 Ashley Avenue's CQC rating?
Its overall rating from the Care Quality Commission is Good, published on 6 September 2019.