Rated Care Homes

6a Sheerstone

G

Good

Rated on

Rating from the Care Quality Commission.

At a glance

  • 1 rating

    Only one rating on record, so there is no trend to show yet.

  • 5 years

    since the latest rating was published. A rating this old may not show how the service is today.

  • 332 of 445

    rated care homes in Kent are rated Good, like this one.

6a Sheerstone: inspection record

Care home, 1 beds, Kent

Rated Good in April 2022.

6a Sheerstone: inspection record: inspection ratings by year, 2015 to 2026
201520162017201820192020202120222023202420252026
Overall
Safe
Effective
Caring
Responsive
Well-led

Ratings published by the Care Quality Commission.

Compare nearby

  1. –
    19 Sheerstone Not yet rated, less than 0.1 miles away
  2. G
    School Lane Good, 0.2 miles away
  3. G
    Rose House Good, 0.3 miles away
  4. G
    Bridge House Good, 0.8 miles away
  5. G
    Court Regis Good, 1.5 miles away

See all care homes in Kent

See all care homes in Iwade

About the service

From the Care Quality Commission's inspection report published 30 April 2022. Quoted under the Open Government Licence.

6a Sheerstone is a residential care home providing personal care to up to one person. The service was specifically designed to provide support to one person in one adapted building. At the time of our inspection one person was using the service.

What inspectors found

The service was able to demonstrate how they were meeting the underpinning principles of Right support, right care, right culture.

Read the rest of CQC's summary

Right support: Model of care and setting maximises people's choice, control and Independence; The service was commissioned to meet the needs of the person using the service. Care and support was provided in a safe, clean, well equipped, well-furnished and well-maintained environment which met the person's sensory and physical needs. The person living at the service had adapted their bedroom to their liking and was supported to make changes and their independence was encouraged.

Right care: Care is person-centred and promotes people's dignity, privacy and human rights; The needs and quality of life of the person formed the basis of the culture at the service. Staff understood their role in making sure that the person was always put first. They provided care that was genuinely person centred.

Right culture: Ethos, values, attitudes and behaviours of leaders and care staff ensure people using services lead confident, inclusive and empowered lives; Support met the person's needs and aspirations. Support focused on quality of life and followed best practice. Staff regularly evaluated the quality of support given, involving the person, their family and other professionals as appropriate. The person living at the home, made choices and took part in meaningful activities which were part of their planned care and support. Staff supported them to achieve their aspirations and goals.

• The person living at the service was supported to have maximum choice and control of their life and staff supported them in the least restrictive way possible and in their best interests; the policies and systems in the service supported this practice.

• The person living at the home was able to lead a confident, inclusive and empowered life because of the ethos, values, attitudes and behaviours of the management and staff.

• The leadership of the service had worked hard to create a learning culture. Staff felt empowered to participate in their learning and suggest improvements. There was a transparent and open and honest culture between the person, those important to them, staff and leaders. They all felt confident to raise concerns and complaints.

• The service had enough appropriately skilled staff to meet people's needs and keep them safe.

• The person living at the home was supported to be independent and had control over their own life. Their human rights were upheld.

• The person living at the home received compassionate care from staff who protected and respected their privacy and dignity and understood their individual needs. Communication needs were met and information was shared in a way that could be understood.

• Individual risks were assessed regularly in a person-centred way. The person living at the home was involved in managing their own risks whenever possible and had opportunities for positive risk taking.

• Behavioural support plans were in place to support behaviours that could challenge the person or others, these plans reduced the need for restrictive practices. Systems were in place to report and learn from any incidents where restrictive practices were used.

• The person living at the home received care and support from trained staff able to meet their needs and wishes. Managers ensured that staff had relevant training, regular supervision and appraisal.

• The person living at the home was supported by staff who understood best practice in relation to learning disability and/or autism. Governance systems ensured they were kept safe and received a high quality of care and support in line with their personal needs. The person and those important to them, worked with leaders to develop and improve the service.

Questions to ask when you visit

  1. The last rating is 5 years old. Ask what has changed since then.
  2. Ask to see the most recent Care Quality Commission (CQC) report and what the home did about any points in it.
  3. Visit at different times of day, including a mealtime.

Registration details

Registered manager
Deborah Rogers
Registered with the CQC since
What it provides
Care home service without nursing
Who it supports
Learning disabilities or autistic spectrum disorder

Inspection report

Read the full inspection report (opens the Care Quality Commission website)

1 inspection report, latest 30 April 2022. The reports are on the Care Quality Commission website.

The rating is the Care Quality Commission's. We show it as published and do not change it.

Who runs it

Provider
CLBD Limited
Ownership type
Organisation
Companies House number
08778341 (opens Companies House)

CLBD Limited runs 12 services, all in the South East. 9 are rated Good or Outstanding and 3 have no rating yet.

Other services run by CLBD Limited

  1. G
    24 Seabrook Road Good. Care home, Kent
  2. G
    26 Seabrook Road Good. Care home, Kent
  3. G
    95 Ashley Avenue Good. Care home, Kent
  4. G
    Burham Court Good. Home care, Kent

See all 12 services run by CLBD Limited

Getting help from Kent County Council

The council can assess what care someone needs and tell them what help with the cost they may get.

Checked on the council's website, November 2026.

Common questions

Does 6a Sheerstone provide nursing care?
No. The Care Quality Commission lists 6a Sheerstone as a care home without nursing.
How many beds does 6a Sheerstone have?
The Care Quality Commission's register lists 1 beds at 6a Sheerstone.
When was 6a Sheerstone last inspected?
The Care Quality Commission's latest rating for 6a Sheerstone was published on 30 April 2022.
Who runs 6a Sheerstone?
6a Sheerstone is run by CLBD Limited. It runs 12 services, all in the South East.
What is 6a Sheerstone's CQC rating?
Its overall rating from the Care Quality Commission is Good, published on 30 April 2022.

Contact

Address
6a Sheerstone, Iwade, Sittingbourne, ME9 8RN Map (opens Google Maps)
Read the full inspection report (opens the Care Quality Commission website)

Compare nearby

  1. –
    19 Sheerstone Not yet rated, less than 0.1 miles away
  2. G
    School Lane Good, 0.2 miles away
  3. G
    Rose House Good, 0.3 miles away
  4. G
    Bridge House Good, 0.8 miles away
  5. G
    Court Regis Good, 1.5 miles away

See all care homes in Kent

See all care homes in Iwade