Rated Care Homes

Rose House

G

Good

Rated on

Rating from the Care Quality Commission.

At a glance

  • 1 rating

    Only one rating on record, so there is no trend to show yet.

  • 5 years

    since the latest rating was published. A rating this old may not show how the service is today.

  • 332 of 445

    rated care homes in Kent are rated Good, like this one.

Rose House: inspection record

Care home, 4 beds, Kent

Rated Good in October 2021.

Rose House: inspection record: inspection ratings by year, 2015 to 2026
201520162017201820192020202120222023202420252026
Overall
Safe
Effective
Caring
Responsive
Well-led

Ratings published by the Care Quality Commission.

Compare nearby

  1. –
    19 Sheerstone Not yet rated, 0.3 miles away
  2. G
    6a Sheerstone Good, 0.3 miles away
  3. G
    School Lane Good, 0.3 miles away
  4. G
    Bridge House Good, 1 mile away
  5. G
    Court Regis Good, 1.8 miles away

See all care homes in Kent

See all care homes in Iwade

About the service

From the Care Quality Commission's inspection report published 19 October 2021. Quoted under the Open Government Licence.

Rose House is a residential care home providing support to three young adults at the time of our inspection. The service can support up to four people in one adapted building.

What inspectors found

The service could show how they met the principles of Right support, right care, right culture.

Read the rest of CQC's summary

People lead confident, inclusive and empowered lives because of the ethos, values, attitudes and behaviour of the management and staff.

The needs and quality of life of people formed the basis of the culture at the service. Staff understood their role in making sure that people were always put first. They provided care that was genuinely person centred.

The leadership of the service had worked hard to create a learning culture. Staff felt empowered to participate in their learning and suggest improvements. There was a transparent, open and honest culture between people, those important to them, staff and leaders. They all felt confident to raise concerns and complaints.

People were supported to have maximum choice and control of their lives and staff supported them in the least restrictive way possible and in their best interests; the policies and systems in the service supported this practice.

• People's care and support was provided in a safe, clean, well equipped, well-furnished and well- maintained environment which met people's sensory and physical needs. • People were protected from abuse and poor care. The service had enough appropriately skilled staff to meet people's needs and keep them safe. • People were supported to be independent and had control over their own lives. Their human rights were upheld. • People received kind and compassionate care from staff who protected and respected their privacy and

dignity and understood each person's individual needs. People had their communication needs met and information was shared in a way that could be understood. • People's risks were assessed regularly in a person-centred way, people had opportunities for positive risk taking. People were involved in managing their own risks whenever possible. • People who showed signs of distress had proactive plans in place to reduce the need for restrictive practices. Systems were in place to report and learn from any incidents where restrictive practices were used. • People made choices and took part in meaningful activities which were part of their planned care and support. Staff supported them to achieve their aspirations and goals. • People's care, treatment and support plans, reflected their sensory, cognitive and functioning needs. • People received support that met their needs and aspirations. Support focused on people's quality of life and followed best practice. Staff regularly evaluated the quality of support given, involving the person, their families and other professionals as appropriate. • People received care, support and treatment from trained staff and specialists able to meet their needs and wishes. Managers ensured that staff had relevant training, regular supervision and appraisal. • People and those important to them, including advocates, were actively involved in planning their care. Where needed a multidisciplinary team worked well together to provide the planned care. • Staff understood their roles and responsibilities under the Human Rights Act 1998, Equality Act 2010, Mental Health Act 1983 and the Mental Capacity Act 2005. • People were supported by staff who understood best practice in relation to learning disability and/or autism. Governance systems ensured people were kept safe and received a high quality of care and support in line with their personal needs. People and those important to them, worked with leaders to develop and improve the service.

Questions to ask when you visit

  1. The last rating is 5 years old. Ask what has changed since then.
  2. Ask to see the most recent Care Quality Commission (CQC) report and what the home did about any points in it.
  3. Visit at different times of day, including a mealtime.

Registration details

Registered manager
Deborah Rogers
Registered with the CQC since
What it provides
Care home service without nursing
Who it supports
Learning disabilities or autistic spectrum disorder, Mental Health, Younger Adults

Inspection report

Read the full inspection report (opens the Care Quality Commission website)

1 inspection report, latest 19 October 2021. The reports are on the Care Quality Commission website.

The rating is the Care Quality Commission's. We show it as published and do not change it.

Who runs it

Provider
CLBD Limited
Ownership type
Organisation
Companies House number
08778341 (opens Companies House)

CLBD Limited runs 12 services, all in the South East. 9 are rated Good or Outstanding and 3 have no rating yet.

Other services run by CLBD Limited

  1. G
    24 Seabrook Road Good. Care home, Kent
  2. G
    26 Seabrook Road Good. Care home, Kent
  3. G
    6a Sheerstone Good. Care home, Kent
  4. G
    95 Ashley Avenue Good. Care home, Kent

See all 12 services run by CLBD Limited

Getting help from Kent County Council

The council can assess what care someone needs and tell them what help with the cost they may get.

Checked on the council's website, November 2026.

Common questions

Does Rose House provide nursing care?
No. The Care Quality Commission lists Rose House as a care home without nursing.
How many beds does Rose House have?
The Care Quality Commission's register lists 4 beds at Rose House.
When was Rose House last inspected?
The Care Quality Commission's latest rating for Rose House was published on 19 October 2021.
Who runs Rose House?
Rose House is run by CLBD Limited. It runs 12 services, all in the South East.
What is Rose House's CQC rating?
Its overall rating from the Care Quality Commission is Good, published on 19 October 2021.

Contact

Phone
01795 429454
Address
42 The Street, Iwade, Sittingbourne, ME9 8SJ Map (opens Google Maps)
Read the full inspection report (opens the Care Quality Commission website)

Compare nearby

  1. –
    19 Sheerstone Not yet rated, 0.3 miles away
  2. G
    6a Sheerstone Good, 0.3 miles away
  3. G
    School Lane Good, 0.3 miles away
  4. G
    Bridge House Good, 1 mile away
  5. G
    Court Regis Good, 1.8 miles away

See all care homes in Kent

See all care homes in Iwade