Rated Care Homes

Farriess Court

G

Good

Rated on

Rating from the Care Quality Commission.

At a glance

  • 4 ratings

    Its last inspection improved it from Requires improvement to Good.

  • 10 months

    since the latest rating was published.

  • 44 of 63

    rated care homes in Derby are rated Good, like this one.

Farriess Court: inspection record

Care home, 26 beds, Derby

Rated Good in December 2025, up from Requires improvement.

Farriess Court: inspection record: inspection ratings by year, 2015 to 2026
201520162017201820192020202120222023202420252026
Overall
Safe
Effective
Caring
Responsive
Well-led

Ratings published by the Care Quality Commission.

Compare nearby

  1. G
    Elvaston Lodge Nursing Home Good, 0.5 miles away
  2. G
    New Spring Lodge Good, 0.5 miles away
  3. RI
    Kiwi House Requires improvement, 0.6 miles away
  4. G
    The Yews Residential Home Good, 0.6 miles away
  5. –
    New Bourne Lodge Not yet rated, 0.8 miles away

See all care homes in Derby

What inspectors found

From the Care Quality Commission's assessment published 23 December 2025 (assessment visit 13 November 2025). Quoted under the Open Government Licence.

Date of assessment: 26 November 2025.

Farriess Court is a care home providing personal care and accommodation for up to 26 people. At the time of the inspection 23 people were living at the home. The service provides care to younger adults, older people, some of whom were living with dementia and/or physical disabilities.

  • Safe Good
  • Effective Good
  • Caring Good
  • Responsive Good
  • Well-led Good
Read the rest of CQC's summary

This was a planned assessment.

Safety concerns identified on the day of inspection included a frayed carpet and a loose door. The registered manager took immediate action to eliminate the risk of harm to people and improve the systems for identifying and reporting safety risks in the environment.

Overall, the home was clean. However, we found there to be areas for improvement. For example, stained floor coverings and chipped paintwork, worn furniture and damaged equipment presented a risk to effective infection and control (IPC) procedures as these could not be cleaned thoroughly. The provider was aware of the safety and IPC issues and had an action plan in place to make improvements. Many maintenance and safety improvements had been made, including the installation of a new boiler providing hot water and heat throughout the home and openers fitted to windows to ensure fresh air could enter the home.

The provider confirmed no CCTV was used at the location and the CCTV in use signage was removed immediately.

We found improvements had been made since the last inspection. For example, people’s risk assessments were followed to ensure their safety. The provider had made arrangements for people to smoke safely outside the building to eliminate the impact of smoke in the home.

Stakeholders shared consistently positive feedback about the staff and the registered manager.

Pre-admission assessments were completed face to face to ensure people’s needs could be met safely. People or their relatives knew who to speak to if they had any concerns and were confident any issues they reported would be resolved. People were supported to manage their medicines safely.

People’s health and care needs were understood and arrangements made to ensure these were met. A medical professional attended the home weekly to review people’s health care needs. Daily visits were made by the district nurse team to manage people’s diabetes.

The management team had the skills, knowledge and experience to lead the service.

  1. Safe

    Good

    Safe – this means we looked for evidence that people were protected from abuse and avoidable harm.


    At our last assessment we rated this key question required improvement. At this assessment the rating has changed to good. This meant people were safe and protected from avoidable harm.

  2. Effective

    Good

    Effective – this means we looked for evidence that people’s care, treatment and support achieved good outcomes and promoted a good quality of life, based on best available evidence.

    At our last assessment we rated this key question requires improvement. At this assessment the rating has changed to good. This meant people’s outcomes were consistently good, and people’s feedback confirmed this.

  3. Caring

    Good

    Caring – this means we looked for evidence that the provider involved people and treated them with compassion, kindness, dignity and respect.

    At our last assessment we rated this key question good. At this assessment the rating has remained good. This meant people were supported and treated with dignity and respect; and involved as partners in their care.

  4. Responsive

    Good

    Responsive – this means we looked for evidence that the provider met people’s needs.

    At our last assessment we rated this key question good. At this assessment the rating has remained good. This meant people’s needs were met through good organisation and delivery.

  5. Well-led

    Good

    Well-led – this means we looked for evidence that service leadership, management and governance assured high-quality, person-centred care; supported learning and innovation; and promoted an open, fair culture.

    At our last assessment we rated this key question requires improvement. At this assessment the rating has changed to good. This meant the service was consistently managed and well-led. Leaders and the culture they created promoted high-quality, person-centred care.

Questions to ask when you visit

  1. Ask to see the most recent Care Quality Commission (CQC) report and what the home did about any points in it.
  2. Visit at different times of day, including a mealtime.

Registration details

Registered manager
Danielle Akosah-Rogers
Registered with the CQC since
What it provides
Care home service without nursing
Who it supports
Dementia, Older People, Physical Disability, Younger Adults

Inspection report

Read the full inspection report (opens the Care Quality Commission website)

3 inspection reports, latest 14 March 2020. Latest assessment published 23 December 2025; the Care Quality Commission's newer assessments are published on its website rather than as reports.

The rating is the Care Quality Commission's. We show it as published and do not change it.

Who runs it

Provider
Farriess Court LimitedBrand: Ashe Group
Ownership type
Organisation
Companies House number
05641304 (opens Companies House)

Getting help from Derby City Council

The council can assess what care someone needs and tell them what help with the cost they may get.

Checked on the council's website, November 2026.

Common questions

Does Farriess Court provide nursing care?
No. The Care Quality Commission lists Farriess Court as a care home without nursing.
How many beds does Farriess Court have?
The Care Quality Commission's register lists 26 beds at Farriess Court.
When was Farriess Court last inspected?
The Care Quality Commission's latest rating for Farriess Court was published on 23 December 2025.
Who runs Farriess Court?
Farriess Court is run by Farriess Court Limited.
What is Farriess Court's CQC rating?
Its overall rating from the Care Quality Commission is Good, published on 23 December 2025.

Contact

Phone
01332 755555
Address
103 Boulton Lane, Alvaston, Derby, DE24 0FF Map (opens Google Maps)
Read the full inspection report (opens the Care Quality Commission website)

Compare nearby

  1. G
    Elvaston Lodge Nursing Home Good, 0.5 miles away
  2. G
    New Spring Lodge Good, 0.5 miles away
  3. RI
    Kiwi House Requires improvement, 0.6 miles away
  4. G
    The Yews Residential Home Good, 0.6 miles away
  5. –
    New Bourne Lodge Not yet rated, 0.8 miles away

See all care homes in Derby