Rated Care Homes

Rons Place

G

Good

Rated on

Rating from the Care Quality Commission.

At a glance

  • 3 ratings

    Rated Good at every inspection since 2015.

  • This month

    The latest rating was published.

  • 48 of 54

    rated care homes in Solihull are rated Good, like this one.

Rons Place: inspection record

Care home, 4 beds, Solihull

Rated Good in October 2026.

Rons Place: inspection record: inspection ratings by year, 2015 to 2026
201520162017201820192020202120222023202420252026
Overall
Safe
Effective
Caring
Responsive
Well-led

Ratings published by the Care Quality Commission.

Compare nearby

  1. G
    The Friendly Inn Good, 0.1 miles away
  2. G
    Alcott Lane Good, 0.2 miles away
  3. G
    Wagstaff Way Good, 0.3 miles away
  4. G
    Bell Lane Good, 0.5 miles away
  5. G
    St. Giles Care Home Good, 0.5 miles away

See all care homes in Solihull

See all care homes in Kingshurst

What inspectors found

From the Care Quality Commission's assessment published 15 October 2026 (assessment visit 4 August 2026). Quoted under the Open Government Licence.

Ron's Place is a 'care home' it provides care and accommodation for up to four people with a diagnosis of a learning disability and autistic spectrum disorder. At the time of our visit there were two people living in the home. We carried out an inspection of this service between 27 August 2026 and 27 September 2026. This was a comprehensive inspection carried out due to the age of the existing rating.

  • Safe Good
  • Effective Good
  • Caring Good
  • Responsive Good
  • Well-led Good
Read the rest of CQC's summary

We expect health and social care providers to guarantee people with a learning disability and autistic people respect, equality, dignity, choices and independence and good access to local communities that most people take for granted. ‘Right support, right care, right culture’ is the guidance CQC follows to make assessments and judgements about services supporting people with a learning disability and autistic people and providers must have regard to it. The provider was meeting the principles of right support, right care, right culture.

A culture of learning and continuous improvement was embedded throughout the service, reflecting the principles of Right Support, Right Care, Right Culture. People received right support through well-coordinated, person-centred approaches to transitions, risk management and safeguarding, which promoted safety, independence and individual rights.

Staff delivered right care by providing compassionate, effective and personalised support that was responsive to people's assessed needs. The service demonstrated a positive and inclusive right culture, where people were respected, involved in decisions about their care, and encouraged to maintain choice and control over their lives.

Robust recruitment procedures, appropriate training and effective management oversight ensured staff were knowledgeable, competent and deployed in sufficient numbers to meet people's needs safely. Systems for medicines management, infection prevention and control, and environmental safety were consistently maintained, helping people feel safe and confident in the quality and reliability of the care they received.

Assessments were comprehensive and person-centred. Some improvements were required to ensure care records and staff training records were consistently reviewed and updated. These areas were discussed with the management team, who were open to feedback and demonstrated a commitment to strengthening processes and driving further improvement.

Care plans contained detailed and personalised information that enabled staff to provide individualised support. People and their relatives were actively involved in care planning and review processes, ensuring care continued to reflect their preferences, goals and needs. Where risks had been identified, care records contained guidance to help staff minimise risks to people's health, safety and wellbeing. Although some records were not always fully up to date, staff demonstrated a strong understanding of people's needs, preferences and abilities, enabling them to provide safe and effective support.

Staff received training relevant to the needs of the people they supported and effectively applied their skills, knowledge and experience to build trusting relationships and deliver positive outcomes. Medicines were stored, administered and managed safely in accordance with prescribed guidance.

People benefited from support provided by a caring, trained and experienced staff team. Staffing levels were sufficient to ensure people received timely and responsive care. People were offered choice in relation to meals and drinks, with dietary needs and personal preferences consistently respected.

People and their relatives understood how to raise concerns or complaints and felt confident that these would be listened to and addressed appropriately. Regular meetings, questionnaires and day-to-day conversations encouraged people, relatives and staff to share their views and contribute to service development, reinforcing a culture of openness and continuous improvement.

While quality assurance systems were in place, audits and monitoring processes were not always completed consistently, and some records, such as staff training documentation, were not always fully up to date. Strengthening these governance arrangements would further support the service's ability to identify trends, monitor performance and enhance the quality of care provided. The service demonstrated the key principles of Right Support, Right Care, Right Culture, ensuring people were supported safely, treated with dignity and respect, and empowered to live fulfilling lives.

  1. Safe

    Good

    Safe – this means we looked for evidence that people were protected from abuse and avoidable harm. At our last assessment we rated this key question good. At this assessment the rating has remained good.

    This meant people were safe and protected from avoidable harm.

  2. Effective

    Good

    Effective – this means we looked for evidence that people’s care, treatment and support achieved good outcomes and promoted a good quality of life, based on best available evidence.

    At our last assessment we rated this key question good. At this assessment the rating has remained good.

    This meant people’s outcomes were consistently good, and people’s feedback confirmed this.

  3. Caring

    Good

    Caring – this means we looked for evidence that the provider involved people and treated them with compassion, kindness, dignity and respect.

    At our last assessment we rated this key question good. At this assessment the rating has remained good.

    This meant people were supported and treated with dignity and respect; and involved as partners in their care.

  4. Responsive

    Good

    Responsive – this means we looked for evidence that the provider met people’s needs.

    At our last assessment we rated this key question good. At this assessment the rating has remained good.

    This meant people’s needs were met through good organisation and delivery.

  5. Well-led

    Good

    Well-led – this means we looked for evidence that service leadership, management and governance assured high-quality, person-centred care; supported learning and innovation; and promoted an open, fair culture.

    At our last assessment we rated this key question requires improvement. At this assessment the rating has changed to good. This meant the service was consistently managed and well-led. Leaders and the culture they created promoted high-quality, person-centred care.

Questions to ask when you visit

  1. Ask to see the most recent Care Quality Commission (CQC) report and what the home did about any points in it.
  2. Visit at different times of day, including a mealtime.

Registration details

Registered manager
Elaine Carty
Registered with the CQC since
What it provides
Care home service without nursing
Who it supports
Learning disabilities or autistic spectrum disorder, Younger Adults

Inspection report

Read the full inspection report (opens the Care Quality Commission website)

5 inspection reports, latest 29 December 2017. Latest assessment published 15 October 2026; the Care Quality Commission's newer assessments are published on its website rather than as reports.

The rating is the Care Quality Commission's. We show it as published and do not change it.

Who runs it

Ownership type
Organisation
Companies House number
07243336 (opens Companies House)

The Maples Residential Care Home Limited runs 2 services, all in the West Midlands. 2 are rated Good or Outstanding.

Other services run by The Maples Residential Care Home Limited

  1. G
    The Maples Residential Care Home Limited Good. Care home, Solihull

Getting help from Solihull Metropolitan Borough Council

The council can assess what care someone needs and tell them what help with the cost they may get.

Checked on the council's website, November 2026.

Common questions

Does Rons Place provide nursing care?
No. The Care Quality Commission lists Rons Place as a care home without nursing.
How many beds does Rons Place have?
The Care Quality Commission's register lists 4 beds at Rons Place.
When was Rons Place last inspected?
The Care Quality Commission's latest rating for Rons Place was published on 15 October 2026.
Who runs Rons Place?
Rons Place is run by The Maples Residential Care Home Limited. It runs 2 services, all in the West Midlands.
What is Rons Place's CQC rating?
Its overall rating from the Care Quality Commission is Good, published on 15 October 2026.

Contact

Address
4 Cardiff Grove, Birmingham, B37 5EY Map (opens Google Maps)
Read the full inspection report (opens the Care Quality Commission website)

Compare nearby

  1. G
    The Friendly Inn Good, 0.1 miles away
  2. G
    Alcott Lane Good, 0.2 miles away
  3. G
    Wagstaff Way Good, 0.3 miles away
  4. G
    Bell Lane Good, 0.5 miles away
  5. G
    St. Giles Care Home Good, 0.5 miles away

See all care homes in Solihull

See all care homes in Kingshurst