Broadoak Manor Care Home
- Care home
- 120 beds
- Nursing care
- Dementia care
- Registered since 2017
- Parr, St Helens, North West
Inadequate
Rated on
Rating from the Care Quality Commission.
At a glance
5 ratings
Its last inspection moved it down from Good to Inadequate.
6 months
since the latest rating was published.
2 of 36
rated care homes in St Helens are rated Inadequate, like this one.
Broadoak Manor Care Home: inspection record
Rated Inadequate in April 2026, down from Good.
| 2015 | 2016 | 2017 | 2018 | 2019 | 2020 | 2021 | 2022 | 2023 | 2024 | 2025 | 2026 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Overall | ||||||||||||
| Safe | ||||||||||||
| Effective | ||||||||||||
| Caring | ||||||||||||
| Responsive | ||||||||||||
| Well-led |
Ratings published by the Care Quality Commission.
Compare nearby
Nearest rated Good or Outstanding: Brookfield Support Centre (Good, 0.1 miles away) and Parr Care Home (Outstanding, 0.6 miles away).
Nearest care homes:
- G Brookfield Support Centre Good, 0.1 miles away
- O Parr Care Home Outstanding, 0.6 miles away
- G Madison Court Good, 1.2 miles away
- G Segal Gardens Good, 1.4 miles away
- G Stocks Hall Care Home - St Helens Good, 1.5 miles away
What inspectors found
From the Care Quality Commission's assessment published 24 April 2026 (assessment visit 29 December 2025). Quoted under the Open Government Licence.
Date of Assessment: 6 January to 3 February 2026. Broadoak Manor Care Home is a residential care home providing nursing and personal care for up to 120 people across 4 separate units. At the time of our assessment, 105 people were living at the home, some of whom were living with dementia. We carried out this assessment due to an increase in safeguarding concerns received by CQC, indicating people were not receiving safe care or treatment.
- Safe Inadequate
- Effective Inadequate
- Caring No rating
- Responsive No rating
- Well-led No rating
Read the rest of CQC's summary
The provider was in breach of 6 of the legal regulations relating to person-centred care, dignity and respect, consent, safe care and treatment including medicines management, safeguarding and good governance.
Lessons were not always learnt to continually identify and embed good practice. Systems in place to review accidents, incidents and trends were not effective in identifying some of the concerns and inconsistencies we found. People were not always protected from abuse and improper treatment; the provider failed to ensure the use of restrictive practices were legally authorised, risk assessed and reviewed in line with the requirements of the Mental Capacity Act 2005.
People were not always provided with safe care and treatment; they were not protected from the risk of choking. We found shortfalls in Infection Prevention and Control (IPC) systems; the provider failed to ensure the environment was clean. Medicines were not managed safely, and we were not assured all staff had received appropriate training to meet the needs of people.
People were not always treated as individuals, with dignity and respect, or provided with person centred care. There was a lack of activities and stimulation for people living in the home.
Improvements were required to ensure care plans were person centred and reflective of people’s preferences and specific assessed needs.
Governance systems were ineffective in assessing, monitoring and driving improvement. There was a lack of provider oversight of key areas of risk within the service.
The service had recently undergone changes in management, with an interim manager in place at the time of the assessment. Staff provided positive feedback about these changes and told us they felt able to raise concerns with the management team.
We observed some positive interactions between staff and people, and it was evident some staff knew people well and had built good rapports.
Following the feedback, the management team developed a new action plan to work towards and had already began making some changes within the service.
This service is being placed in special measures. The purpose of special measures is to ensure that services providing inadequate care make significant improvements. Special measures provide a framework within which we use our enforcement powers in response to inadequate care and provide a timeframe within which providers must improve the quality of the care they provide.
In instances where CQC has begun a process of regulatory action, we may publish this information on our website after any representations and/or appeals have been concluded, if the action has been taken forward.
-
Safe
Inadequate
Safe – this means we looked for evidence people were protected from abuse and avoidable harm. At our last assessment we rated this key question good. At this assessment the rating has changed to inadequate. This meant people were not safe and were at risk of avoidable harm.
The provider was in breach of legal regulation in relation to people’s safe care and treatment, safeguarding, and the way people’s medicines were managed safely.
-
Effective
Inadequate
Effective – this means we looked for evidence people’s care, treatment and support achieved good outcomes and promoted a good quality of life, based on best available evidence. At our last assessment we rated this key question good. At this assessment the rating has changed to inadequate. This meant there were widespread and significant shortfalls in people’s care, support and outcomes.
The provider was in breach of legal regulation in relation to consent.
-
Caring
No rating
Caring – this means we looked for evidence the provider involved people and treated them with compassion, kindness, dignity and respect. At our last assessment we rated this key question good. At this assessment the rating has changed to requires improvement. This meant people did not always feel well-supported, cared for or treated with dignity and respect.
The provider was in breach of legal regulation in relation to dignity and respect.
-
Responsive
No rating
Responsive – this means we looked for evidence the provider met people’s needs.
At our last assessment we rated this key question good. At this assessment the rating has changed to requires improvement. This meant people’s needs were not always met.
The provider was in breach of legal regulation in relation to person centred care.
-
Well-led
No rating
Well-led – this means we looked for evidence service leadership, management and governance assured high-quality, person-centred care; supported learning and innovation; and promoted an open, fair culture. At our last assessment we rated this key question good. At this assessment the rating has changed to requires improvement. This meant the management and leadership was inconsistent. Leaders and the culture they created did not always support the delivery of high-quality, person-centred care.
The provider was in breach of legal regulation in relation to governance at the service.
Questions to ask when you visit
- Safe was rated Inadequate on 24 April 2026. Ask how medicines are managed, how staffing levels are decided and how incidents are reviewed.
- Effective was rated Inadequate on 24 April 2026. Ask about staff training and how health appointments are arranged.
- Caring was rated Requires improvement on 24 April 2026. Ask how staff protect dignity and how residents are involved in decisions about their care.
- Responsive was rated Requires improvement on 24 April 2026. Ask to see how care plans are kept up to date, how complaints are handled and what activities are on offer.
Registration details
- Registered with the CQC since
- What it provides
- Care home service with nursing
- Who it supports
- Dementia, Older People, Younger Adults
Inspection report
Read the full inspection report (opens the Care Quality Commission website)5 inspection reports, latest 2 March 2022. Latest assessment published 24 April 2026; the Care Quality Commission's newer assessments are published on its website rather than as reports.
The rating is the Care Quality Commission's. We show it as published and do not change it.
Who runs it
- Provider
- HC-One No.1 LimitedBrand: Welltower
- Ownership type
- Organisation
- Companies House number
- 10257888 (opens Companies House)
HC-One No.1 Limited runs 2 services in England, 1 of them in the North West. 1 is rated Good or Outstanding and 1 is rated Requires improvement or Inadequate.
Other services run by HC-One No.1 Limited
- G Fieldway Care Home Good. Care home with nursing, Merton, London
Getting help from St Helens Borough Council
The council can assess what care someone needs and tell them what help with the cost they may get.
- Adult social care at St Helens Borough Council
- Ask for a care needs assessment
- Phone: 01744 676767, every day 8am to 10pm
- Support for carers
- Paying for care: St Helens Borough Council
Checked on the council's website, November 2026.
Common questions
- Does Broadoak Manor Care Home provide nursing care?
- Yes. The Care Quality Commission lists Broadoak Manor Care Home as a care home with nursing.
- How many beds does Broadoak Manor Care Home have?
- The Care Quality Commission's register lists 120 beds at Broadoak Manor Care Home.
- When was Broadoak Manor Care Home last inspected?
- The Care Quality Commission's latest rating for Broadoak Manor Care Home was published on 24 April 2026.
- Who runs Broadoak Manor Care Home?
- Broadoak Manor Care Home is run by HC-One No.1 Limited. It runs 2 services in England, 1 of them in the North West.
- What is Broadoak Manor Care Home's CQC rating?
- Its overall rating from the Care Quality Commission is Inadequate, published on 24 April 2026.
Contact
- Phone
- 01744 615626
- Address
- Mulcrow Close, Parr, St Helens, WA9 1HB Map (opens Google Maps)
Compare nearby
Nearest rated Good or Outstanding: Brookfield Support Centre (Good, 0.1 miles away) and Parr Care Home (Outstanding, 0.6 miles away).
Nearest care homes:
- G Brookfield Support Centre Good, 0.1 miles away
- O Parr Care Home Outstanding, 0.6 miles away
- G Madison Court Good, 1.2 miles away
- G Segal Gardens Good, 1.4 miles away
- G Stocks Hall Care Home - St Helens Good, 1.5 miles away