Rated Care Homes

Adeline House Care Home

RI

Requires improvement

Rated on

Rating from the Care Quality Commission.

At a glance

  • 4 ratings

    Its last inspection moved it down from Good to Requires improvement.

  • 11 months

    since the latest rating was published.

  • 14 of 73

    rated care homes in Doncaster are rated Requires improvement, like this one.

Adeline House Care Home: inspection record

Care home with nursing, 40 beds, Doncaster

Rated Requires improvement in November 2025, down from Good.

Adeline House Care Home: inspection record: inspection ratings by year, 2015 to 2026
201520162017201820192020202120222023202420252026
Overall
Safe
Effective
Caring
Responsive
Well-led

Ratings published by the Care Quality Commission.

Compare nearby

Nearest rated Good or Outstanding: Harry Priestley House (Outstanding, 0.1 miles away) and King Street (Good, 0.2 miles away).

Nearest care homes:

  1. O
    Harry Priestley House Outstanding, 0.1 miles away
  2. RI
    Northfield Care Centre Requires improvement, 0.2 miles away
  3. G
    King Street Good, 0.2 miles away
  4. G
    Bennfield House Good, 0.4 miles away
  5. G
    Thorne House Good, 0.4 miles away

See all care homes in Doncaster

See all care homes in Thorne

What inspectors found

From the Care Quality Commission's assessment published 25 November 2025 (assessment visit 22 September 2025). Quoted under the Open Government Licence.

Date of assessment: 7 October 2025 to 21 October 2025. Adeline House is a residential care home providing care and support to younger people and older people, some of whom were living with dementia. Some people living at the home were receiving nursing care. The home can accommodate up to 37 people. At the time of the assessment there were 30 people living at the home. We previously assessed the service in April 2023, and it was rated good. We assessed the service due to the length of time since our last assessment and due to concerns we had received about the home. We looked at all key questions and all quality statements. The rating has changed from good to requires improvement. The provider was in breach of regulation relating to good governance.

  • Safe No rating
  • Effective Good
  • Caring Good
  • Responsive Good
  • Well-led No rating
Read the rest of CQC's summary

The provider did not always analyse accidents and incident to ensure trends and patterns were identified and practice improved. We carried out a tour of the home and found the home was predominantly clean, however, some areas of the home required attention. We also raised some issues regarding the safety of the environment. We discussed these issues with the manager who took action to address them. The provider had policies and procedures in place to ensure people were safeguarded from the risk of abuse. The provider shared information appropriately to ensure people received care and support in line with their needs. People received their medicines as prescribed, although some recording could be improved. Risks associated with people’s care were identified and plans were in place to mitigate future risks.

People’s needs were assessed and kept under review. Care plans were updated as people’s needs changed. However, people and relatives told us they would like to be more informed about their care and support. We received concerns from external professionals who told us some aspects of care could be improved. People had access to healthcare professionals. The management team supported people to meet their goals. Staff ensured they gained consent prior to delivering tasks.

People were treated with kindness and respect. We observed staff interacting with people and they were caring, although at times they were task focused. People had access to meaningful activities and took part in social interests.

Relatives told us staff understood their family members needs but were not always sure care was delivered in line with them. Information was provided to people although not always in formats which met their needs. The manager had implemented a bi-monthly newsletter to help improve communication.

Governance systems in place did not always identify areas for improvement. Some issues we raised during the assessment process were not previously identified. Systems required strengthening and embedding into practice.

  1. Safe

    No rating

    Safe – this means we looked for evidence that people were protected from abuse and avoidable harm. At our last assessment we rated this key question good. At this assessment the rating has changed to requires improvement. This meant some aspects of the service were not always safe and there was limited assurance about safety. There was an increased risk that people could be harmed.

  2. Effective

    Good

    Effective – this means we looked for evidence that people’s care, treatment and support achieved good outcomes and promoted a good quality of life, based on best available evidence.

    At our last assessment we rated this key question good. At this assessment the rating has remained good. This meant people’s outcomes were consistently good, and people’s feedback confirmed this.

  3. Caring

    Good

    Caring – this means we looked for evidence that the provider involved people and treated them with compassion, kindness, dignity and respect. At our last assessment we rated this key question good. At this assessment the rating has remained good. This meant people were supported and treated with dignity and respect; and involved as partners in their care.

  4. Responsive

    Good

    Responsive – this means we looked for evidence that the provider met people’s needs.At our last assessment we rated this key question good. At this assessment the rating has remained good. This meant people’s needs were met through good organisation and delivery.

  5. Well-led

    No rating

    Well-led – this means we looked for evidence that service leadership, management and governance assured high-quality, person-centred care; supported learning and innovation; and promoted an open, fair culture. At our last assessment we rated this key question good. At this assessment the rating has changed to requires improvement. This meant the management and leadership was inconsistent. Leaders and the culture they created did not always support the delivery of high-quality, person-centred care.

    The service was in breach of legal regulation in relation to governance at the service.

Questions to ask when you visit

  1. Safe was rated Requires improvement on 25 November 2025. Ask how medicines are managed, how staffing levels are decided and how incidents are reviewed.
  2. Well-led was rated Requires improvement on 25 November 2025. Ask about changes in management and what has changed since the report.
  3. Ask how nursing cover works at night and at weekends.

Registration details

Registered manager
Lisa Shaw
Registered with the CQC since
What it provides
Care home service with nursing
Who it supports
Dementia, Older People, Physical Disability, Younger Adults

Inspection report

Read the full inspection report (opens the Care Quality Commission website)

5 inspection reports, latest 26 April 2023. Latest assessment published 25 November 2025; the Care Quality Commission's newer assessments are published on its website rather than as reports.

The rating is the Care Quality Commission's. We show it as published and do not change it.

Who runs it

Ownership type
Organisation
Companies House number
09600407 (opens Companies House)

Every Sensation Care Ltd runs 4 services in England, 1 of them in Yorkshire and the Humber. 3 are rated Good or Outstanding and 1 is rated Requires improvement or Inadequate.

Other services run by Every Sensation Care Ltd

  1. G
    Allan House Good. Care home, Staffordshire, West Midlands
  2. G
    Boughton Manor Care Home Good. Care home with nursing, Nottinghamshire, East Midlands
  3. G
    Oaklea House Good. Care home, Staffordshire, West Midlands

Getting help from City of Doncaster Council

The council can assess what care someone needs and tell them what help with the cost they may get.

Checked on the council's website, November 2026.

Common questions

Does Adeline House Care Home provide nursing care?
Yes. The Care Quality Commission lists Adeline House Care Home as a care home with nursing.
How many beds does Adeline House Care Home have?
The Care Quality Commission's register lists 40 beds at Adeline House Care Home.
When was Adeline House Care Home last inspected?
The Care Quality Commission's latest rating for Adeline House Care Home was published on 25 November 2025.
Who runs Adeline House Care Home?
Adeline House Care Home is run by Every Sensation Care Ltd. It runs 4 services in England, 1 of them in Yorkshire and the Humber.
What is Adeline House Care Home's CQC rating?
Its overall rating from the Care Quality Commission is Requires improvement, published on 25 November 2025.

Contact

Phone
01405 815512
Address
Queen Street, Thorne, Doncaster, DN8 5AQ Map (opens Google Maps)
Read the full inspection report (opens the Care Quality Commission website)

Compare nearby

Nearest rated Good or Outstanding: Harry Priestley House (Outstanding, 0.1 miles away) and King Street (Good, 0.2 miles away).

Nearest care homes:

  1. O
    Harry Priestley House Outstanding, 0.1 miles away
  2. RI
    Northfield Care Centre Requires improvement, 0.2 miles away
  3. G
    King Street Good, 0.2 miles away
  4. G
    Bennfield House Good, 0.4 miles away
  5. G
    Thorne House Good, 0.4 miles away

See all care homes in Doncaster

See all care homes in Thorne