Rated Care Homes

Roberttown Care Home Limited

RI

Requires improvement

Rated on

Rating from the Care Quality Commission.

At a glance

  • 7 ratings

    Its last inspection improved it from Inadequate to Requires improvement.

  • 5 months

    since the latest rating was published.

  • 26 of 119

    rated care homes in Kirklees are rated Requires improvement, like this one.

Roberttown Care Home Limited: inspection record

Care home, 29 beds, Kirklees

Rated Requires improvement in May 2026, up from Inadequate.

Roberttown Care Home Limited: inspection record: inspection ratings by year, 2015 to 2026
201520162017201820192020202120222023202420252026
Overall
Safe
Effective
Caring
Responsive
Well-led

Ratings published by the Care Quality Commission.

Compare nearby

Nearest rated Good or Outstanding: Holly Court (Good, 0.5 miles away) and Poplars (Good, 0.5 miles away).

Nearest care homes:

  1. G
    Holly Court Good, 0.5 miles away
  2. G
    Poplars Good, 0.5 miles away
  3. G
    The Beeches Good, 0.5 miles away
  4. G
    The Conkers Good, 0.5 miles away
  5. RI
    Willow Court Requires improvement, 0.5 miles away

See all care homes in Kirklees

See all care homes in Liversedge

What inspectors found

From the Care Quality Commission's assessment published 6 May 2026 (assessment visit 5 February 2026). Quoted under the Open Government Licence.

Dates of assessment were from 23 and 25 February 2026. This was a follow up assessment to review the actions taken since the last assessment. The service is a care home providing personal care for people, some of whom are living with dementia.

  • Safe No rating
  • Effective No rating
  • Caring No rating
  • Responsive No rating
  • Well-led No rating
Read the rest of CQC's summary

At this assessment we found the provider was in breach of 2 legal regulations in relation to safe care and treatment and good governance.

Governance and management systems were not always effective and there were a number of concerns not fully addressed from the last assessment. Systems and processes for assuring the quality of care were in place but still not robustly implemented and lacked consistency. Some key quality issues were not addressed. There were some signs of progress beginning to emerge from issues identified at the last assessment, including a manager in post, staff supervision and improved oversight of people’s weight loss. Improvements were still needed to ensure the safe management of medicines, and the quality, consistency and accuracy of records to demonstrate people’s safe care and support.

Care plans and risk assessments were not always accurately or sufficiently in place. Assessments before admission lacked detail and were not always completed in a timely way. Individual risks were not always assessed, including risks around people’s behaviour and the management of medication.

Staff understood how to identify and act upon safeguarding concerns, although reporting processes were not always followed, and incident reports were not always adequately reviewed to identify and mitigate concerns. Where individual safeguarding risks were known this was not always documented so staff could mitigate against these.

There was evidence of effective teamwork, although still some concerns around low morale within the staff team. Staff were kind, caring and respectful in their approach, and mindful of people’s dignity. Staff training was completed regularly, although not all shifts had the presence of staff qualified in first aid.

Some evidence of learning from the last inspection was apparent and some areas were beginning to be addressed, although some repeated concerns remained.

We have asked the provider for an action plan in response to the concerns found at this assessment.

  1. Safe

    No rating

    Safe – this means we looked for evidence that people were protected from abuse and avoidable harm.

    At our last assessment we rated this key question inadequate. At this assessment the rating has changed to requires improvement. This meant some aspects of the service were not always safe and there was limited assurance about safety. There was an increased risk that people could be harmed.

    The service was in breach of regulation in relation to safe care and treatment.

  2. Effective

    No rating

    Effective – this means we looked for evidence that people’s care, treatment and support achieved good outcomes and promoted a good quality of life, based on best available evidence

    At our last assessment we rated this key question inadequate. At this assessment the rating has changed to requires improvement. This meant the effectiveness of people’s care, treatment and support did not always achieve good outcomes or was inconsistent.

  3. Caring

    No rating

    Caring – this means we looked for evidence that the provider involved people and treated them with compassion, kindness, dignity and respect.

    At our last assessment we rated this key question inadequate. At this assessment the rating has changed to requires improvement. This meant people did not always feel well-supported, cared for or treated with dignity and respect.

  4. Responsive

    No rating

    Responsive – this means we looked for evidence that the provider met people’s needs.

    At our last assessment we rated this key question inadequate. At this assessment the rating has changed to requires improvement. This meant people’s needs were not always met.

  5. Well-led

    No rating

    Well-led – this means we looked for evidence that service leadership, management and governance assured high-quality, person-centred care; supported learning and innovation; and promoted an open, fair culture.

    At our last assessment we rated this key question inadequate. At this assessment the rating has changed to requires improvement. This meant the management and leadership was inconsistent. Leaders and the culture they created did not always support the delivery of high-quality, person-centred care.

    The service was in breach of legal regulation in relation to good governance.

Questions to ask when you visit

  1. Safe was rated Requires improvement on 6 May 2026. Ask how medicines are managed, how staffing levels are decided and how incidents are reviewed.
  2. Effective was rated Requires improvement on 6 May 2026. Ask about staff training and how health appointments are arranged.
  3. Caring was rated Requires improvement on 6 May 2026. Ask how staff protect dignity and how residents are involved in decisions about their care.
  4. Responsive was rated Requires improvement on 6 May 2026. Ask to see how care plans are kept up to date, how complaints are handled and what activities are on offer.

Registration details

Registered manager
Marie Sharp
Registered with the CQC since
What it provides
Care home service without nursing
Who it supports
Dementia, Older People, Physical Disability, Sensory Impairment, Younger Adults

Inspection report

Read the full inspection report (opens the Care Quality Commission website)

9 inspection reports, latest 14 December 2019. Latest assessment published 6 May 2026; the Care Quality Commission's newer assessments are published on its website rather than as reports.

The rating is the Care Quality Commission's. We show it as published and do not change it.

Who runs it

Provider
Roberttown Care Home LimitedBrand: Advinia Healthcare
Ownership type
Organisation
Companies House number
07805578 (opens Companies House)

Getting help from Kirklees Council

The council can assess what care someone needs and tell them what help with the cost they may get.

Checked on the council's website, November 2026.

Common questions

Does Roberttown Care Home Limited provide nursing care?
No. The Care Quality Commission lists Roberttown Care Home Limited as a care home without nursing.
How many beds does Roberttown Care Home Limited have?
The Care Quality Commission's register lists 29 beds at Roberttown Care Home Limited.
When was Roberttown Care Home Limited last inspected?
The Care Quality Commission's latest rating for Roberttown Care Home Limited was published on 6 May 2026.
Who runs Roberttown Care Home Limited?
Roberttown Care Home Limited is run by Roberttown Care Home Limited.
What is Roberttown Care Home Limited's CQC rating?
Its overall rating from the Care Quality Commission is Requires improvement, published on 6 May 2026.

Contact

Phone
01924 411600
Address
98 Church Road, Roberttown, Liversedge, WF15 8BE Map (opens Google Maps)
Read the full inspection report (opens the Care Quality Commission website)

Compare nearby

Nearest rated Good or Outstanding: Holly Court (Good, 0.5 miles away) and Poplars (Good, 0.5 miles away).

Nearest care homes:

  1. G
    Holly Court Good, 0.5 miles away
  2. G
    Poplars Good, 0.5 miles away
  3. G
    The Beeches Good, 0.5 miles away
  4. G
    The Conkers Good, 0.5 miles away
  5. RI
    Willow Court Requires improvement, 0.5 miles away

See all care homes in Kirklees

See all care homes in Liversedge