Anahita Recovery Centre
Care home, Greenwich, 34 beds
Good
Rated on
Rating from the Care Quality Commission.
Anahita Recovery Centre: inspection record
Rated Good in August 2025.
| 2015 | 2016 | 2017 | 2018 | 2019 | 2020 | 2021 | 2022 | 2023 | 2024 | 2025 | 2026 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Overall | ||||||||||||
| Safe | ||||||||||||
| Effective | ||||||||||||
| Caring | ||||||||||||
| Responsive | ||||||||||||
| Well-led |
Ratings published by the Care Quality Commission.
Inspected and rated 3 times since 2016. Rated Good in 2016, 2019 and August 2025.
It has been rated Good at every inspection since 2016. The latest rating was published 14 months ago.
How it compares locally
- One of 34 Good care homes in Greenwich, out of 41 with a rating.
- Larger than 7 in 10 care homes in Greenwich.
What inspectors found
From the Care Quality Commission's assessment published 29 August 2025 (assessment visit 27 June 2025). Quoted under the Open Government Licence.
Date of assessment: 30 July and 7 August 2025.
Anahita Recovery Centre is a care home that provides supported accommodation for up to 34 to people who have mental health needs. At the time of the inspection 30 people were using the service. The inspection was prompted in part by notification of an incident following which a person using the service suffered injury. This inspection did not examine the circumstances of the incident. However, the information shared with CQC about the incident indicated potential concerns about the management of risk. This inspection examined those risks. The last rating for this service was good (13 April 2019).
Read the full summary
We spoke with the registered manager, deputy manager and 7 staff members. We also spoke with 1 relative; 3 visiting health care professionals and 7 other professionals contacted us by email to offer feedback about the service. These professionals included doctors, consultants, nurses and pharmacists. We looked at 11 people’s care plans and risk assessments and other records relating to the management of the service. We found that record keeping at the service required improvement. The registered manager was taking action to address these concerns.
We found risks to people had been assessed to ensure their needs were safely met. Robust recruitment checks had taken place before staff started working at the service. There were enough staff to support people and meet their needs. People had access to health care professionals when they needed them, and they received their medicines when needed. There were systems in place to help prevent and control infections.Staff were trained in areas specifically related to people’s care needs and they received regular supervision from their managers. People’s diverse needs and wishes were assessed, documented and respected. People were supported to manage their health and wellbeing to maximise their independence. There was a complaints procedure in place in formats that people could understand.
The registered manager and staff worked in partnership with health and social care providers to deliver an effective service. There were systems in place to monitor the quality and safety of the service, and any learning was identified and acted on. People opinions about the service were considered through surveys, meetings and spot checks. Staff told us they received good support from the management team.
-
Safe
Good
Safe – this means we looked for evidence that people were protected from abuse and avoidable harm. At our last inspection we rated this key question Good. At this inspection the rating has remained Good. This meant people were safe and protected from avoidable harm.
-
Effective
Good
Effective – this means we looked for evidence that people’s care, treatment and support achieved good outcomes and promoted a good quality of life, based on best available evidence. At our last inspection we rated this key question Good. At this inspection the rating has remained Good. This meant people’s outcomes were consistently good, and people’s feedback confirmed this.
-
Caring
Good
Caring – this means we looked for evidence that the service involved people and treated them with compassion, kindness, dignity and respect. At our last inspection we rated this key question Good. At this inspection the rating has remained Good. This meant people were supported and treated with dignity and respect; and involved as partners in their care.
-
Responsive
Good
Responsive – this means we looked for evidence that the service met people’s needs. At our last inspection we rated this key question Good. At this inspection the rating has remained Good. This meant people’s needs were met through good organisation and delivery.
-
Well-led
Good
Well-led – this means we looked for evidence that service leadership, management and governance assured high-quality, person-centred care; supported learning and innovation; and promoted an open, fair culture. At our last inspection we rated this key question Good. At this inspection the rating has remained Good. This meant the service was consistently managed and well-led. Leaders and the culture they created promoted high-quality, person-centred care.
Questions to ask when you visit
- Ask to see the most recent Care Quality Commission (CQC) report and what the home did about any points in it.
- Visit at different times of day, including a mealtime.
Contact and registration details
| Address | 104 Gavestone Rd, Lee, London, SE12 9BL |
|---|---|
| Registered manager | Thomas Kearns |
| Registered with the CQC since | |
| What it provides |
|
| Who it supports |
|
| Inspection reports | 4 inspection reports, latest 19 April 2019 (opens the Care Quality Commission website) Latest assessment published 29 August 2025; CQC's newer assessments are published on its website rather than as reports. |
Inspection report
Read the full inspection report (opens the Care Quality Commission website)The rating is the Care Quality Commission's. We show it as published and do not change it.
Who runs it
| Provider | Anahita Rehabilitation Centre LLP |
|---|---|
| Ownership type | Organisation |
| Companies House number | OC370284 (opens Companies House) |
Nearest alternatives
- – Penberth Harland Care home, 0.3 miles awayNot yet rated
- G Fairmount Care home, 0.7 miles awayGood
- G Brymore House Care Home with Nursing Care home with nursing, 0.7 miles awayGood
- G Baring Lodge Residential Home Care home, 0.8 miles awayGood
- G Brownhill Lodge Care home, 0.8 miles awayGood
Getting help from Royal Borough of Greenwich
The council can assess what care someone needs and tell them what help with the cost they may get.
- Adult social care at Royal Borough of Greenwich
- Ask for a care needs assessment
- Phone: 020 8921 2304, Monday to Thursday 9am to 5pm, Friday 9am to 4pm. Out-of-hours emergencies: 020 8854 8888
- Contact adult social care online
- Support for carers
- Paying for care: Royal Borough of Greenwich
Checked on the council's website, November 2026.
Common questions
- Does Anahita Recovery Centre provide nursing care?
- No. The Care Quality Commission lists Anahita Recovery Centre as a care home without nursing.
- How many beds does Anahita Recovery Centre have?
- The Care Quality Commission's register lists 34 beds at Anahita Recovery Centre.
- When was Anahita Recovery Centre last inspected?
- The Care Quality Commission's latest rating for Anahita Recovery Centre was published on 29 August 2025.
- Who runs Anahita Recovery Centre?
- Anahita Recovery Centre is run by Anahita Rehabilitation Centre LLP.
- What is Anahita Recovery Centre's CQC rating?
- Its overall rating from the Care Quality Commission is Good, published on 29 August 2025.