Rated Care Homes

St Cecilia

G

Good

Rated on

Rating from the Care Quality Commission.

At a glance

  • 4 ratings

    First rated Good in 2017, most recently Good in October 2025.

  • 12 months

    since the latest rating was published.

  • 108 of 121

    rated care homes in Bournemouth, Christchurch and Poole are rated Good, like this one.

St Cecilia: inspection record

Care home, 15 beds, Bournemouth, Christchurch and Poole

Rated Good in October 2025.

St Cecilia: inspection record: inspection ratings by year, 2015 to 2026
201520162017201820192020202120222023202420252026
Overall
Safe
Effective
Caring
Responsive
Well-led

Ratings published by the Care Quality Commission.

Compare nearby

  1. G
    The Lindsay Good, 0.2 miles away
  2. G
    Branksome Heights Good, 0.3 miles away
  3. G
    Shaftesbury Horizons Good, 0.5 miles away
  4. G
    Park Manor Care Home Good, 0.5 miles away
  5. O
    Canford Chase Outstanding, 0.6 miles away

See all care homes in Bournemouth, Christchurch and Poole

See all care homes in Branksome Park

What inspectors found

From the Care Quality Commission's assessment published 29 October 2025 (assessment visit 29 September 2025). Quoted under the Open Government Licence.

St Cecilia is registered to provide care and support for up to 15 people. The service provides residential care for older adults, some of whom are living with dementia. At the time of this inspection, there were 14 people living at the service. This was a planned inspection to check the quality and safety of the care provided. The inspection took place between 8 October and 9 October 2025.

  • Safe Good
  • Effective Good
  • Caring Outstanding
  • Responsive Good
  • Well-led Good
Read the rest of CQC's summary

People were receiving an exceptionally caring service which had consistently exceeded their expectations. Staff were dedicated to providing the best of everything for people through support, care and consideration of their individuality. People were truly at the core of the service and staff worked tirelessly to ensure their needs were met.

Health and social care professionals were extremely positive about the kind, talented staff and were unanimous in their views of the service having impeccably high standards. Professionals told us the staff and registered manager went above and beyond for the people they supported. Professionals said staff at St Cecilia had provided care and support beyond compare and this had enabled people to live well at the service for longer.

People had detailed care plans and risk assessments in place for all their care and support needs. Assessments were person centred and put people in control of their care. Safeguarding procedures were in place and staff knew how to raise concerns; they were confident they would be taken seriously by the registered manager. People can only be deprived of their liberty to receive care and treatment when this is in their best interests and legally authorised under the Mental Capacity Act 2005 (MCA). In care homes, and some hospitals, this is usually through MCA application procedures called the Deprivation of Liberty Safeguards (DoLS). We checked whether the service was working within the principles of the MCA, whether appropriate legal authorisations were in place when needed to deprive a person of their liberty, and whether any conditions relating to those authorisations were being met. People received theirmedicines as prescribed and safe systems were in place. Lessons were learnt and shared within the service. Recruitment processes were in place and were strengthened during the inspection. There were enough staff to meet people’s needs. Staff were supported by a comprehensive induction and training programme, including supervisions and the completion of national diplomas. Environmental cleaning, utility and equipment checks meant the service was safe, clean and hygienic. The provider had an ongoing improvement, refurbishment and redecoration plan in operation. Staff felt appreciated and were proud to work for the service. Governance systems were operating effectively, and this included oversight by the provider, with plans to increase this. The registered manager told us they were supported well by the provider and were confident and proud of the staff team. We received extremely positive feedback about the registered manager of the service.

  1. Safe

    Good

    Safe – this means we looked for evidence that people were protected from abuse and avoidable harm. At our last inspection we rated this key question good. At this inspection the rating has remained good.This meant people were safe and protected from avoidable harm.

  2. Effective

    Good

    Effective – this means we looked for evidence that people’s care, treatment and support achieved good outcomes and promoted a good quality of life, based on best available evidence.At our last inspection we rated this key question good. At this inspection the rating has remained good.This meant people’s outcomes were consistently good, and people’s feedback confirmed this.

  3. Caring

    Outstanding

    Caring – this means we looked for evidence that the service involved people and treated them with compassion, kindness, dignity and respect.At our last inspection we rated this key question good. At this inspection the rating has changed to outstanding.This meant people were truly respected and valued as individuals; and empowered as partners in their care in an exceptional service.

  4. Responsive

    Good

    Responsive – this means we looked for evidence that the service met people’s needs.At our last inspection we rated this key question good. At this inspection the rating has remained good.This meant people’s needs were met through good organisation and delivery.

  5. Well-led

    Good

    Well-led – this means we looked for evidence that service leadership, management and governance assured high-quality, person-centred care; supported learning and innovation; and promoted an open, fair culture. At our last inspection we rated this key question good. At this inspection the rating has remained good.This meant the service was consistently managed and well-led. Leaders and the culture they created promoted high-quality, person-centred care.

Questions to ask when you visit

  1. Ask to see the most recent Care Quality Commission (CQC) report and what the home did about any points in it.
  2. Visit at different times of day, including a mealtime.

Registration details

Registered manager
Robin Hiney
Registered with the CQC since
What it provides
Care home service without nursing
Who it supports
Dementia, Older People

Inspection report

Read the full inspection report (opens the Care Quality Commission website)

5 inspection reports, latest 22 July 2021. Latest assessment published 29 October 2025; the Care Quality Commission's newer assessments are published on its website rather than as reports.

The rating is the Care Quality Commission's. We show it as published and do not change it.

Who runs it

Ownership type
Organisation
Companies House number
07152354 (opens Companies House)

Getting help from BCP Council (Bournemouth, Christchurch and Poole Council)

The council can assess what care someone needs and tell them what help with the cost they may get.

Checked on the council's website, November 2026.

Common questions

Does St Cecilia provide nursing care?
No. The Care Quality Commission lists St Cecilia as a care home without nursing.
How many beds does St Cecilia have?
The Care Quality Commission's register lists 15 beds at St Cecilia.
When was St Cecilia last inspected?
The Care Quality Commission's latest rating for St Cecilia was published on 29 October 2025.
Who runs St Cecilia?
St Cecilia is run by St. Cecilia Care Dorset Limited.
What is St Cecilia's CQC rating?
Its overall rating from the Care Quality Commission is Good, published on 29 October 2025.