Rated Care Homes

Auden House Residential Home

G

Good

Rated on

Rating from the Care Quality Commission.

At a glance

  • 3 ratings

    Its last inspection moved it down from Outstanding to Good.

  • 4 months

    since the latest rating was published.

  • 25 of 34

    rated care homes in Tameside are rated Good, like this one.

Auden House Residential Home: inspection record

Care home, 24 beds, Tameside

Rated Good in June 2026, down from Outstanding.

Auden House Residential Home: inspection record: inspection ratings by year, 2015 to 2026
201520162017201820192020202120222023202420252026
Overall
Safe
Effective
Caring
Responsive
Well-led

Ratings published by the Care Quality Commission.

Compare nearby

  1. RI
    The Vicarage Residential Care Home Requires improvement, 0.7 miles away
  2. G
    Eden House Good, 0.8 miles away
  3. G
    Guide Lane Nursing Home Good, 1.1 miles away
  4. G
    Daisy House Good, 1.2 miles away
  5. G
    Sunnyside Good, 1.3 miles away

See all care homes in Tameside

What inspectors found

From the Care Quality Commission's assessment published 30 June 2026 (assessment visit 23 April 2026). Quoted under the Open Government Licence.

Date of assessment: 12 May 2026 to the 19 May 2026.

Auden House Residential Home is a residential care home providing accommodation and personal care to 24 people aged 65 and over at the time of the assessment. The service can support up to 24 people.

  • Safe Good
  • Effective Good
  • Caring Good
  • Responsive Good
  • Well-led Good
Read the rest of CQC's summary

The service was overall safe, with a culture that encouraged openness and learning from incidents. Staff understood safeguarding responsibilities and took appropriate action to protect people from harm. Risks were assessed and managed to support people’s independence. The environment was clean, secure, and supported safe care, and infection control practices were effective. However, improvements were needed to ensure all staff completed the required levels of training and received regular supervision, together with stronger oversight for the management of medicines.

The service provided effective care, based on people’s assessed needs, which were regularly reviewed and updated. Staff worked well with healthcare professionals to deliver coordinated and evidence-based care, supporting people’s health, nutrition, and independence. People and relatives felt confident in the care provided.

The service demonstrated a strong caring approach, with staff consistently treating people with kindness, compassion, and respect. People felt comfortable, and feedback from relatives was positive. Staff knew people well and provided person-centred care that respected individual preferences, dignity, and privacy. People were supported to maintain independence and make choices about their daily lives.

The service delivering person-centred care that reflected people’s preferences and circumstances. Communication with people and their families was effective, and there were opportunities to provide feedback and be involved in decisions. The provider worked well with external services to maintain continuity of care.

The service was well led, with a positive culture supported by visible and approachable management. The registered manager responded to feedback and took action to address issues. However, governance systems were not always fully effective in identifying and addressing risks, particularly in relation to medicines and record keeping, meaning further strengthening of oversight and quality assurance processes was needed.

  1. Safe

    Good

    Safe – this means we looked for evidence that people were protected from abuse and avoidable harm.

    At our last assessment we rated this key question good. At this assessment the rating has remained good. This meant people were safe and protected from avoidable harm.

  2. Effective

    Good

    Effective – this means we looked for evidence that people’s care, treatment and support achieved good outcomes and promoted a good quality of life, based on best available evidence.

    At our last assessment we rated this key question good. At this assessment the rating has remained good. This meant people’s outcomes were consistently good, and people’s feedback confirmed this.

  3. Caring

    Good

    Caring – this means we looked for evidence that the provider involved people and treated them with compassion, kindness, dignity and respect.

    At our last assessment we rated this key question good. At this assessment the rating has remained good. This meant people were supported and treated with dignity and respect; and involved as partners in their care.

  4. Responsive

    Good

    Responsive – this means we looked for evidence that the provider met people’s needs.

    At our last assessment we rated this key question outstanding. At this assessment the rating has changed to good. This meant people’s needs were met through good organisation and delivery.

  5. Well-led

    Good

    Well-led – this means we looked for evidence that service leadership, management and governance assured high-quality, person-centred care; supported learning and innovation; and promoted an open, fair culture.

    At our last assessment we rated this key question outstanding. At this assessment the rating has changed to good. This meant the service was consistently managed and well-led. Leaders and the culture they created promoted high-quality, person-centred care.

Questions to ask when you visit

  1. Ask to see the most recent Care Quality Commission (CQC) report and what the home did about any points in it.
  2. Visit at different times of day, including a mealtime.

Registration details

Registered manager
Judith Stockton
Registered with the CQC since
What it provides
Care home service without nursing
Who it supports
Dementia, Older People, Physical Disability, Sensory Impairment

Inspection report

Read the full inspection report (opens the Care Quality Commission website)

6 inspection reports, latest 27 February 2021. Latest assessment published 30 June 2026; the Care Quality Commission's newer assessments are published on its website rather than as reports.

The rating is the Care Quality Commission's. We show it as published and do not change it.

Who runs it

Ownership type
Organisation
Companies House number
07591904 (opens Companies House)

Getting help from Tameside Metropolitan Borough Council

The council can assess what care someone needs and tell them what help with the cost they may get.

Checked on the council's website, November 2026.

Common questions

Does Auden House Residential Home provide nursing care?
No. The Care Quality Commission lists Auden House Residential Home as a care home without nursing.
How many beds does Auden House Residential Home have?
The Care Quality Commission's register lists 24 beds at Auden House Residential Home.
When was Auden House Residential Home last inspected?
The Care Quality Commission's latest rating for Auden House Residential Home was published on 30 June 2026.
Who runs Auden House Residential Home?
Auden House Residential Home is run by Auden House Care Limited.
What is Auden House Residential Home's CQC rating?
Its overall rating from the Care Quality Commission is Good, published on 30 June 2026.

Contact

Address
473 Audenshaw Road, Audenshaw, Manchester, M34 5PS Map (opens Google Maps)
Read the full inspection report (opens the Care Quality Commission website)

Compare nearby

  1. RI
    The Vicarage Residential Care Home Requires improvement, 0.7 miles away
  2. G
    Eden House Good, 0.8 miles away
  3. G
    Guide Lane Nursing Home Good, 1.1 miles away
  4. G
    Daisy House Good, 1.2 miles away
  5. G
    Sunnyside Good, 1.3 miles away

See all care homes in Tameside