Rated Care Homes

Edwardian Care Home

RI

Requires improvement

Rated on

Rating from the Care Quality Commission.

At a glance

  • 2 ratings

    Rated Requires improvement at every inspection since 2019.

  • 17 months

    since the latest rating was published.

  • 7 of 32

    rated care homes in Luton are rated Requires improvement, like this one.

Edwardian Care Home: inspection record

Care home, 34 beds, Luton

Rated Requires improvement in May 2025.

Edwardian Care Home: inspection record: inspection ratings by year, 2015 to 2026
201520162017201820192020202120222023202420252026
Overall
Safe
Effective
Caring
Responsive
Well-led

Ratings published by the Care Quality Commission.

Compare nearby

Nearest rated Good or Outstanding: Marlin Lodge (Good, 0.2 miles away) and Ambassador House (Good, 0.2 miles away).

Nearest care homes:

  1. G
    Marlin Lodge Good, 0.2 miles away
  2. G
    Ambassador House Good, 0.2 miles away
  3. RI
    Crowley Care Homes Ltd - St Annes Care Home Requires improvement, 0.2 miles away
  4. G
    Rosedale Care Home Good, 0.2 miles away
  5. RI
    Georgina House Requires improvement, 0.2 miles away

See all care homes in Luton

See all care homes in Central Luton

What inspectors found

From the Care Quality Commission's assessment published 16 May 2025 (assessment visit 27 January 2025). Quoted under the Open Government Licence.

Date of assessment: 30 January 2025 to 11 March 2025. The service is a residential care home registered to support adults of all ages living with dementia, mental health and learning disabilities and autistic people. The service can support up to 34 people. At the time of our assessment, 32 people were living at the home.

  • Safe No rating
  • Effective No rating
  • Caring Good
  • Responsive No rating
  • Well-led No rating
Read the rest of CQC's summary

The provider was in breach of the legal regulation relating to governance. Governance and audit systems had not identified the issues we identified during this assessment. Safeguarding concerns had not always been identified or reported by the registered manager. Risks to people’s health and safety were not always assessed and managed. The environment and infection control practices were not always safe. There were not enough staff to meet people’s care and support needs. Improvement was required to staff recruitment practices. Staff had not always received the training they needed to give them the skills they required to effectively meet the needs of some people living at the home. Medicines records did not always contain clear and robust information indicating an increased risk of people not receiving their prescribed medicines safely.

People were not always supported in line with Mental Capacity Act 2005 (MCA). Staff were not always well supported by leaders at the service.

However, staff had a good understanding of how to keep people safe and how to report concerns. When the service had identified changes to people’s health and care needs, they worked with external health professionals and sought medical advice appropriately.

In instances where CQC have decided to take civil or criminal enforcement action against a provider, we will publish this information on our website after any representations and/ or appeals have been concluded.

  1. Safe

    No rating

    Safe – this means we looked for evidence that people were protected from abuse and avoidable harm. At our last assessment we rated this key question good. At this assessment the rating has changed to requires improvement.

    This meant some aspects of the service were not always safe and there was limited assurance about safety. There was an increased risk that people could be harmed.

  2. Effective

    No rating

    Effective – this means we looked for evidence that people’s care, treatment and support achieved good outcomes and promoted a good quality of life, based on best available evidence.

    At our last assessment we rated this key question good. At this assessment the rating has changed to requires improvement.

    This meant the effectiveness of people’s care, treatment and support did not always achieve good outcomes or was inconsistent.

  3. Caring

    Good

    Caring – this means we looked for evidence that the provider involved people and treated them with compassion, kindness, dignity and respect.

    At our last assessment we rated this key question good. At this assessment the rating has remained good.

    This meant people were supported and treated with dignity and respect; and involved as partners in their care.

  4. Responsive

    No rating

    Responsive – this means we looked for evidence that the provider met people’s needs.

    At our last assessment we rated this key question requires improvement. At this assessment the rating has remained requires improvement.

    This meant people’s needs were not always met.

  5. Well-led

    No rating

    Well-led – this means we looked for evidence that service leadership, management and governance assured high-quality, person-centred care; supported learning and innovation; and promoted an open, fair culture.

    At our last assessment we rated this key question requires improvement. At this assessment the rating has remained requires improvement.

    This meant the management and leadership was inconsistent. Leaders and the culture they created did not always support the delivery of high-quality, person-centred care.

    The service was in breach of legal regulation in relation to governance at the service. The provider had not always ensured their systems were effective or ensured oversight of quality, safeguarding, environmental safety, effective care planning and management of risks. People were not always being protected by MCA.

Questions to ask when you visit

  1. Safe was rated Requires improvement on 16 May 2025. Ask how medicines are managed, how staffing levels are decided and how incidents are reviewed.
  2. Effective was rated Requires improvement on 16 May 2025. Ask about staff training and how health appointments are arranged.
  3. Responsive was rated Requires improvement on 16 May 2025. Ask to see how care plans are kept up to date, how complaints are handled and what activities are on offer.
  4. Well-led was rated Requires improvement on 16 May 2025. Ask about changes in management and what has changed since the report.

Registration details

Registered manager
Maymole Puthoor
Registered with the CQC since
What it provides
Care home service without nursing
Who it supports
Dementia, Learning disabilities or autistic spectrum disorder, Mental Health, Older People, Younger Adults

Inspection report

Read the full inspection report (opens the Care Quality Commission website)

2 inspection reports, latest 5 March 2022. Latest assessment published 16 May 2025; the Care Quality Commission's newer assessments are published on its website rather than as reports.

The rating is the Care Quality Commission's. We show it as published and do not change it.

Who runs it

Ownership type
Organisation
Companies House number
03224641 (opens Companies House)

Getting help from Luton Borough Council

The council can assess what care someone needs and tell them what help with the cost they may get.

Checked on the council's website, November 2026.

Common questions

Does Edwardian Care Home provide nursing care?
No. The Care Quality Commission lists Edwardian Care Home as a care home without nursing.
How many beds does Edwardian Care Home have?
The Care Quality Commission's register lists 34 beds at Edwardian Care Home.
When was Edwardian Care Home last inspected?
The Care Quality Commission's latest rating for Edwardian Care Home was published on 16 May 2025.
Who runs Edwardian Care Home?
Edwardian Care Home is run by Edwardian Care Homes Limited.
What is Edwardian Care Home's CQC rating?
Its overall rating from the Care Quality Commission is Requires improvement, published on 16 May 2025.

Contact

Phone
01582 705100
Address
168 Biscot Road, Luton, LU3 1AX Map (opens Google Maps)
Read the full inspection report (opens the Care Quality Commission website)

Compare nearby

Nearest rated Good or Outstanding: Marlin Lodge (Good, 0.2 miles away) and Ambassador House (Good, 0.2 miles away).

Nearest care homes:

  1. G
    Marlin Lodge Good, 0.2 miles away
  2. G
    Ambassador House Good, 0.2 miles away
  3. RI
    Crowley Care Homes Ltd - St Annes Care Home Requires improvement, 0.2 miles away
  4. G
    Rosedale Care Home Good, 0.2 miles away
  5. RI
    Georgina House Requires improvement, 0.2 miles away

See all care homes in Luton

See all care homes in Central Luton