Paul Murphy Centre
- Care home
- 12 beds
- No nursing
- Dementia care
- Registered since 2018
- Blackley, Manchester, North West
Good
Rated on
Rating from the Care Quality Commission.
At a glance
4 ratings
Its last inspection improved it from Requires improvement to Good.
13 months
since the latest rating was published.
56 of 71
rated care homes in Manchester are rated Good, like this one.
Paul Murphy Centre: inspection record
Rated Good in September 2025, up from Requires improvement.
| 2015 | 2016 | 2017 | 2018 | 2019 | 2020 | 2021 | 2022 | 2023 | 2024 | 2025 | 2026 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Overall | ||||||||||||
| Safe | ||||||||||||
| Effective | ||||||||||||
| Caring | ||||||||||||
| Responsive | ||||||||||||
| Well-led |
Ratings published by the Care Quality Commission.
Compare nearby
- – Factory Lane Not yet rated, 0.3 miles away
- G Oakbank Care Home Good, 0.4 miles away
- G Allendale Residential Home Limited Good, 0.4 miles away
- G Polefield Nursing Home Good, 0.4 miles away
- – Rochdale Road Not yet rated, 0.4 miles away
What inspectors found
From the Care Quality Commission's assessment published 30 September 2025 (assessment visit 4 September 2025). Quoted under the Open Government Licence.
Date of assessment: 10 to 25 September 2025.
The assessment was arranged to follow up on the warning notice served in February 2025 and to ensure compliance with the breaches of regulations found at the last inspection.
- Safe Good
- Effective Good
- Caring Good
- Responsive Good
- Well-led Good
Read the rest of CQC's summary
Paul Murphy Centre is a care home and is registered to provide accommodation for persons who require nursing or personal care for up to 8 people. The service was supporting 4 people at the time of the inspection.
We have assessed the service against ‘Right support, right care, right culture’ guidance to make judgements about whether the provider guaranteed people with a learning disability and autistic people respect, equality, dignity, choices, independence and good access to local communities that most people take for granted.
Right Support:
Staff demonstrated a strong understanding of the people they supported, confidently describing each person’s needs, preferences, and communication styles. People’s communication needs were well understood and respected, and staff interactions consistently promoted choice, independence, and dignity.
People were supported to participate in activities, and staff encouraged engagement based on personal interests. However, feedback from some family members indicated mixed views on whether the range and frequency of activities were sufficient to keep people meaningfully occupied.
Access to healthcare and external support was timely and effective. Staff were proactive in monitoring wellbeing and responded swiftly to any signs of deterioration, ensuring people received the appropriate care and interventions when needed.
Right care:
People received care that was consistently kind, dignified, and respectful. Observations of staff interactions with people living at the home reflected a compassionate and person-centred approach. Staff delivered personal care in a manner that upheld privacy, and information was shared appropriately and confidentially.
Staff were well-trained and demonstrated a clear understanding of their safeguarding responsibilities. They were confident in identifying and reporting any concerns that could compromise a person’s safety. There was a strong, shared commitment across the team in protecting vulnerable people from harm and poor care.
Care plans were detailed, person-centred, and developed in collaboration with families, who contributed to both planning and risk assessments. Staff were able to confidently describe the needs of each person and confirmed they were kept informed of any updates to care plans.
Safe recruitment practices were in place, and staff received appropriate training to ensure they were equipped with the skills and knowledge required to fulfil their roles effectively.
Right culture
Staff felt valued and empowered to contribute to service improvement. They worked in an environment where openness and transparency were encouraged, and where speaking up was safe and supported. Leaders fostered a culture of continuous learning, collaboration, and accountability.
The provider actively championed equality, diversity, and inclusion across the workforce. Staff confirmed they worked in a fair and inclusive setting where their voices were heard.
Families and professionals reported positive engagement with the service and praised the registered manager’s commitment to improvement. Governance systems supported a culture of safety, learning, and responsiveness, ensuring the service remained person-centred and resilient.
-
Safe
Good
Safe – this means we looked for evidence that people were protected from abuse and avoidable harm. At our last assessment we rated this key question requires improvement. At this assessment the rating has changed to good. This meant people were safe and protected from avoidable harm.
-
Effective
Good
Effective – this means we looked for evidence that people’s care, treatment and support achieved good outcomes and promoted a good quality of life, based on best available evidence.
At our last assessment we rated this key question requires improvement. At this assessment the rating has changed to good. This meant people’s outcomes were consistently good, and people’s feedback confirmed this.
-
Caring
Good
Caring – this means we looked for evidence that the provider involved people and treated them with compassion, kindness, dignity and respect.
At our last assessment we rated this key question requires improvement. At this assessment the rating has changed to good. This meant people were supported and treated with dignity and respect; and involved as partners in their care.
-
Responsive
Good
Responsive – this means we looked for evidence that the provider met people’s needs.
At our last assessment we rated this key question requires improvement. At this assessment the rating has changed to good. This meant people’s needs were met through good organisation and delivery.
-
Well-led
Good
Well-led – this means we looked for evidence that service leadership, management and governance assured high-quality, person-centred care; supported learning and innovation; and promoted an open, fair culture.
At our last assessment we rated this key question requires improvement. At this assessment the rating has changed to good. This meant the service was consistently managed and well-led. Leaders and the culture they created promoted high-quality, person-centred care.
Questions to ask when you visit
- Ask to see the most recent Care Quality Commission (CQC) report and what the home did about any points in it.
- Visit at different times of day, including a mealtime.
Registration details
- Registered with the CQC since
- What it provides
- Care home service without nursing
- Who it supports
- Dementia, Learning disabilities or autistic spectrum disorder, Older People, Physical Disability, Sensory Impairment, Younger Adults
Inspection report
Read the full inspection report (opens the Care Quality Commission website)3 inspection reports, latest 2 September 2023. Latest assessment published 30 September 2025; the Care Quality Commission's newer assessments are published on its website rather than as reports.
The rating is the Care Quality Commission's. We show it as published and do not change it.
Who runs it
- Provider
- Vesta Care (UK) Limited
- Ownership type
- Organisation
- Companies House number
- 11042183 (opens Companies House)
Vesta Care (UK) Limited runs 3 services, all in the North West. 3 are rated Good or Outstanding.
Other services run by Vesta Care (UK) Limited
- G Silverdene Residential Home Good. Care home, Manchester
- G Vestacare Good. Home care, Rochdale
Getting help from Manchester City Council
The council can assess what care someone needs and tell them what help with the cost they may get.
- Adult social care at Manchester City Council
- Ask for a care needs assessment
- Phone: 0161 234 5001
- Contact adult social care online
- Support for carers
- Care home fee rates published by the council
Checked on the council's website, November 2026.
Common questions
- Does Paul Murphy Centre provide nursing care?
- No. The Care Quality Commission lists Paul Murphy Centre as a care home without nursing.
- How many beds does Paul Murphy Centre have?
- The Care Quality Commission's register lists 12 beds at Paul Murphy Centre.
- When was Paul Murphy Centre last inspected?
- The Care Quality Commission's latest rating for Paul Murphy Centre was published on 30 September 2025.
- Who runs Paul Murphy Centre?
- Paul Murphy Centre is run by Vesta Care (UK) Limited. It runs 3 services, all in the North West.
- What is Paul Murphy Centre's CQC rating?
- Its overall rating from the Care Quality Commission is Good, published on 30 September 2025.
Contact
- Phone
- 0161 220 5840
- Address
- 1067 - 1071 Rochdale Road, Rochdale Road, Manchester, M9 8AJ Map (opens Google Maps)
Compare nearby
- – Factory Lane Not yet rated, 0.3 miles away
- G Oakbank Care Home Good, 0.4 miles away
- G Allendale Residential Home Limited Good, 0.4 miles away
- G Polefield Nursing Home Good, 0.4 miles away
- – Rochdale Road Not yet rated, 0.4 miles away