Gregory House II
- Care home
- 12 beds
- No nursing
- Registered since 2019
- Sherwood, Nottingham, East Midlands
Good
Rated on
Rating from the Care Quality Commission.
At a glance
1 rating
Only one rating on record, so there is no trend to show yet.
7 years
since the latest rating was published. A rating this old may not show how the service is today.
46 of 71
rated care homes in Nottingham are rated Good, like this one.
Gregory House II: inspection record
Rated Good in February 2020.
| 2015 | 2016 | 2017 | 2018 | 2019 | 2020 | 2021 | 2022 | 2023 | 2024 | 2025 | 2026 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Overall | ||||||||||||
| Safe | ||||||||||||
| Effective | ||||||||||||
| Caring | ||||||||||||
| Responsive | ||||||||||||
| Well-led |
Ratings published by the Care Quality Commission.
Compare nearby
- O Acorn House Outstanding, 0.1 miles away
- RI Carisbrooke House Requires improvement, 0.2 miles away
- G Mapperley Lodge Good, 0.2 miles away
- G Carrington Park Good, 0.3 miles away
- G Devonshire Manor Good, 0.3 miles away
About the service
From the Care Quality Commission's inspection report published 22 February 2020. Quoted under the Open Government Licence.
Gregory House II is a Residential Home which can accommodate 12 people with mental health needs in two adapted buildings. Accommodation is provided on three floors. At the time of the inspection eleven people were living at the service. CQC only inspects where people receive personal care. This is help with tasks related to personal hygiene and eating. Where they do we also consider any wider social care provided.
What inspectors found
People told us they felt safe living at Gregory House II. People were protected from abuse and harm by staff who had received training in safeguarding and knew how to recognise and report abuse. Risks associated with people's care had been assessed and were regularly updated. Environmental safety checks were in place to ensure people and staff were safe from harm.
Read the rest of CQC's summary
Staff received training in how to prevent the spread of infection. People's nutritional needs were met, and people were involved in the choice of menu.
People were supported by sufficient numbers of staff who were skilled and knowledgeable, and people told us staff were kind and caring to them. People told us their privacy was maintained and their possessions were safe. Staff were recruited safely.
People's medicines were stored and managed safely. Staff worked with other healthcare professionals to support peoples mental, physical and emotional needs.
People's opinions of the service were gathered via meetings and surveys. People were treated with dignity and respect.
People were involved in planning their care and support and had access to advocacy services.
Peoples end of life wishes had been explored and staff knew people well.
The service was well-led, and the registered manager understood their regulatory requirements and there were systems in place to regularly monitor the service. Incidents and accidents were recorded, and the service learnt lessons by analysing these incidents.
People were supported to have maximum choice and control of their lives and staff supported them in the least restrictive way possible and in their best interests; the policies and systems in the service supported this practice. People were supported to regain their independence.
Questions to ask when you visit
- The last rating is 7 years old. Ask what has changed since then.
- Ask to see the most recent Care Quality Commission (CQC) report and what the home did about any points in it.
- Visit at different times of day, including a mealtime.
Registration details
- Registered manager
- Michael Thomas
- Registered with the CQC since
- What it provides
- Care home service without nursing
- Who it supports
- Mental Health, Younger Adults
Inspection report
Read the full inspection report (opens the Care Quality Commission website)1 inspection report, latest 22 February 2020. The reports are on the Care Quality Commission website.
The rating is the Care Quality Commission's. We show it as published and do not change it.
Who runs it
- Ownership type
- Partnership
Mrs Colette Louise Thomas & Mr Michael Shaun Thomas runs 2 services, all in the East Midlands. 2 are rated Good or Outstanding.
Other services run by Mrs Colette Louise Thomas & Mr Michael Shaun Thomas
- G Shortwood House Good. Care home, Nottinghamshire
Getting help from Nottingham City Council
The council can assess what care someone needs and tell them what help with the cost they may get.
- Adult social care at Nottingham City Council
- Ask for a care needs assessment
- Phone: 0115 876 3330, Monday to Friday, 9am to 5pm
- Contact adult social care online
- Support for carers
- Paying for care: Nottingham City Council
Checked on the council's website, November 2026.
Common questions
- Does Gregory House II provide nursing care?
- No. The Care Quality Commission lists Gregory House II as a care home without nursing.
- How many beds does Gregory House II have?
- The Care Quality Commission's register lists 12 beds at Gregory House II.
- When was Gregory House II last inspected?
- The Care Quality Commission's latest rating for Gregory House II was published on 22 February 2020.
- Who runs Gregory House II?
- Gregory House II is run by Mrs Colette Louise Thomas & Mr Michael Shaun Thomas. It runs 2 services, all in the East Midlands.
- What is Gregory House II's CQC rating?
- Its overall rating from the Care Quality Commission is Good, published on 22 February 2020.
Contact
- Phone
- 0115 841 2713
- Address
- 391-393, Mansfield Road, Nottingham, NG5 2DG Map (opens Google Maps)
Compare nearby
- O Acorn House Outstanding, 0.1 miles away
- RI Carisbrooke House Requires improvement, 0.2 miles away
- G Mapperley Lodge Good, 0.2 miles away
- G Carrington Park Good, 0.3 miles away
- G Devonshire Manor Good, 0.3 miles away