Rated Care Homes

Bridge House Residential Home

RI

Requires improvement

Rated on

Rating from the Care Quality Commission.

At a glance

  • 3 ratings

    Its last inspection moved it down from Good to Requires improvement.

  • 6 months

    since the latest rating was published.

  • 6 of 49

    rated care homes in Bury are rated Requires improvement, like this one.

Bridge House Residential Home: inspection record

Care home, 30 beds, Bury

Rated Requires improvement in April 2026, down from Good.

Bridge House Residential Home: inspection record: inspection ratings by year, 2015 to 2026
201520162017201820192020202120222023202420252026
Overall
Safe
Effective
Caring
Responsive
Well-led

Ratings published by the Care Quality Commission.

Compare nearby

Nearest rated Good or Outstanding: Highgrove (Good, 0.1 miles away) and Chaffinch Residential Care Home (Good, 0.3 miles away).

Nearest care homes:

  1. G
    Highgrove Good, 0.1 miles away
  2. G
    Chaffinch Residential Care Home Good, 0.3 miles away
  3. G
    Brookdale Care Home Good, 0.5 miles away
  4. G
    Alexander Care Home Good, 0.7 miles away
  5. G
    Carr Bank House Good, 1 mile away

See all care homes in Bury

See all care homes in Central Bury

What inspectors found

From the Care Quality Commission's assessment published 21 April 2026 (assessment visit 15 January 2026). Quoted under the Open Government Licence.

The assessment began on 3 February and concluded on 25 March 2026. Bridge House provides accommodation and personal care for up to 30 people. At the time of our assessment there were 21 people living at the home.

  • Safe No rating
  • Effective No rating
  • Caring Good
  • Responsive No rating
  • Well-led No rating
Read the rest of CQC's summary

This assessment was prompted in part due to information of concern around people’s care and support, staff training and development, meal options, equipment and lack of activities and opportunities. We also wanted to follow up on the 4 breaches of regulation found during out last inspection of the service in July 2025. The provider had submitted at a time an action plan detailing how they would make the necessary improvements. A number of improvements identified within the action plan had not been completed within the timescale identified and remained outstanding.

During this assessment we found the provider remained in breach of 3 regulations in relation to staffing, environment and good governance.

The service had not had a registered manager since May 2023. Further appointments had been unsuccessful. This meant effective management and oversight of the service had not been provided. Furthermore, this had impacted on the support provided for staff. A recent manager appointment had been made; they were due to commence employment following our site visits. Staff felt stable and consistent management was needed to address the action required, improve communication and provide better support and direction for the team.

Systems to evidence robust management and oversight of the service were not in place to demonstrate timely and effective action was taken to drive and embed areas of improvement. Care records were to be expanded upon providing more person centred information and oversight and management of risk needed to be improved. Not all events, which should be reported to CQC by law, had been provided.

Appropriate recruitment checks were in place. Decisions about the suitability of candidates could be improved, along with training, supervision and support for staff. Staff said morale was improving and the team worked well together.

Improvements were still required to enhance the physical environment as well as providing a more dementia-friendly environment.

In instances where CQC has begun a process of regulatory action, we may publish this information on our website after any representations and/or appeals have been concluded, if the action has been taken forward.

  1. Safe

    No rating

    Safe – this means we looked for evidence that people were protected from abuse and avoidable harm.

    At our last assessment we rated this key question requires improvement. At this assessment the rating has remained requires improvement. This meant some aspects of the service were not always safe and there was limited assurance about safety. There was an increased risk that people could be harmed.

    The service remained in breach of legal regulation in relation to staffing and the environment.

  2. Effective

    No rating

    Effective – this means we looked for evidence that people’s care, treatment and support achieved good outcomes and promoted a good quality of life, based on best available evidence.

    At our last assessment we rated this key question good. At this assessment the rating has changed to requires improvement. This meant the effectiveness of people’s care, treatment and support did not always achieve good outcomes or was inconsistent.

  3. Caring

    Good

    Caring – this means we looked for evidence that the provider involved people and treated them with compassion, kindness, dignity and respect.

    At our last assessment we rated this key question requires improvement. At this assessment the rating has changed to good. This meant people were supported and treated with dignity and respect and involved as partners in their care.

  4. Responsive

    No rating

    Responsive – this means we looked for evidence that the provider met people’s needs.

    At our last assessment we rated this key question requires improvement. At this assessment the rating has remained requires improvement.

  5. Well-led

    No rating

    Well-led – this means we looked for evidence that service leadership, management and governance assured high-quality, person-centred care; supported learning and innovation, and promoted an open, fair culture.

    At our last assessment we rated this key question requires improvement. At this assessment the rating has remained requires improvement. This meant the management and leadership was inconsistent. Leaders and the culture they created did not always support the delivery of high-quality, person-centred care.

    The service remained in breach of legal regulation in relation to governance at the service.

Questions to ask when you visit

  1. Safe was rated Requires improvement on 21 April 2026. Ask how medicines are managed, how staffing levels are decided and how incidents are reviewed.
  2. Effective was rated Requires improvement on 21 April 2026. Ask about staff training and how health appointments are arranged.
  3. Responsive was rated Requires improvement on 21 April 2026. Ask to see how care plans are kept up to date, how complaints are handled and what activities are on offer.
  4. Well-led was rated Requires improvement on 21 April 2026. Ask about changes in management and what has changed since the report.

Registration details

Registered manager
Natalie Vernon
Registered with the CQC since
What it provides
Care home service without nursing
Who it supports
Dementia, Older People, Physical Disability, Sensory Impairment, Younger Adults

Inspection report

Read the full inspection report (opens the Care Quality Commission website)

4 inspection reports, latest 4 November 2022. Latest assessment published 21 April 2026; the Care Quality Commission's newer assessments are published on its website rather than as reports.

The rating is the Care Quality Commission's. We show it as published and do not change it.

Who runs it

Provider
Lotus Care (Bridge House) LimitedBrand: Jaydeep Patel
Ownership type
Organisation
Companies House number
11465078 (opens Companies House)

Getting help from Bury Council

The council can assess what care someone needs and tell them what help with the cost they may get.

Checked on the council's website, November 2026.

Common questions

Does Bridge House Residential Home provide nursing care?
No. The Care Quality Commission lists Bridge House Residential Home as a care home without nursing.
How many beds does Bridge House Residential Home have?
The Care Quality Commission's register lists 30 beds at Bridge House Residential Home.
When was Bridge House Residential Home last inspected?
The Care Quality Commission's latest rating for Bridge House Residential Home was published on 21 April 2026.
Who runs Bridge House Residential Home?
Bridge House Residential Home is run by Lotus Care (Bridge House) Limited.
What is Bridge House Residential Home's CQC rating?
Its overall rating from the Care Quality Commission is Requires improvement, published on 21 April 2026.

Contact

Address
Bridge House Care Home, Topping Fold Road, Bury, BL9 7NQ Map (opens Google Maps)
Read the full inspection report (opens the Care Quality Commission website)

Compare nearby

Nearest rated Good or Outstanding: Highgrove (Good, 0.1 miles away) and Chaffinch Residential Care Home (Good, 0.3 miles away).

Nearest care homes:

  1. G
    Highgrove Good, 0.1 miles away
  2. G
    Chaffinch Residential Care Home Good, 0.3 miles away
  3. G
    Brookdale Care Home Good, 0.5 miles away
  4. G
    Alexander Care Home Good, 0.7 miles away
  5. G
    Carr Bank House Good, 1 mile away

See all care homes in Bury

See all care homes in Central Bury