Orchard Court
- Care home
- 43 beds
- No nursing
- Registered since 2013
- Brough, East Riding of Yorkshire, Yorkshire and the Humber
Requires improvement
Rated on
Rating from the Care Quality Commission.
At a glance
5 ratings
Its last inspection moved it down from Good to Requires improvement.
4 months
since the latest rating was published.
28 of 122
rated care homes in East Riding of Yorkshire are rated Requires improvement, like this one.
Orchard Court: inspection record
Rated Requires improvement in June 2026, down from Good.
| 2015 | 2016 | 2017 | 2018 | 2019 | 2020 | 2021 | 2022 | 2023 | 2024 | 2025 | 2026 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Overall | ||||||||||||
| Safe | ||||||||||||
| Effective | ||||||||||||
| Caring | ||||||||||||
| Responsive | ||||||||||||
| Well-led |
Ratings published by the Care Quality Commission.
Compare nearby
Nearest rated Good or Outstanding: The Green Residential Care Home (Good, 1 mile away) and Westerlands Care Village (Good, 2.5 miles away).
Nearest care homes:
- G The Green Residential Care Home Good, 1 mile away
- G Westerlands Care Village Good, 2.5 miles away
- G Brough Manor Care Home Good, 2.7 miles away
- G Lola's House Residential Home Limited Good, 2.9 miles away
- – Primrose House Care Home Not yet rated, 3.3 miles away
What inspectors found
From the Care Quality Commission's assessment published 19 June 2026 (assessment visit 30 March 2026). Quoted under the Open Government Licence.
Date of assessment: 15 April to 7 May 2026. Orchard Court is a care home which can accommodate up to 43 older people. When our assessment started, 33 people were living at the service. The assessment was carried out due to the length of time since the previous assessment.
- Safe No rating
- Effective No rating
- Caring No rating
- Responsive No rating
- Well-led No rating
Read the rest of CQC's summary
A new nominated individual had taken over the care home in November 2025. The provider’s systems did not ensure medicines were managed safely. Records did not demonstrate people received their medicines in line with the prescriber’s instructions. We found some medicines were crushed and were unsafe to do so. Staff did not escalate when medicines errors had occurred for advice to be sought and investigations undertaken. The provider did not have records to demonstrate staff competency to administer medicines safely had been assessed.
Systems were not established to ensure staff were equipped with the required training for their role. Parts of the environment were not well-maintained or cleaned effectively and staff did not always promote best practice with infection prevention and control. Whilst essential checks of fire equipment were in place, the service’s fire risk assessment had not recently been reviewed and there were some outstanding actions from the last assessment. The provider had not ensured contemporaneous records were completed including accurate completion of daily records and consistent information within people’s care records. Care records also lacked person-centred detail to guide staff practice. People had not always been included in discussions about their care and afforded the opportunity to say what they wanted.
The provider was passionate about making improvements at the service and had a programme of refurbishment and had already started taking actions to address elements of the environment including fixing the roof and installing a new kitchen. There was a new manager in post. Although staff hadn’t received regular supervisions, they felt supported, and told us the manager was approachable and visible. The management team were responsive to the feedback and started to take corrective actions including a detailed check of medicines, arranging staff training sessions and organising risk assessments for parts of the premises.
We found the provider was in breach of legal regulations relating to safe care and treatment and governance of the service.
In instances where CQC has begun a process of regulatory action, we may publish this information on our website after any representations and/or appeals have been concluded, if the action has been taken forward.We have also asked the provider for an action plan in response to the concerns found at this assessment.
-
Safe
No rating
This means we looked for evidence that people were protected from abuse and avoidable harm. At our last assessment we rated this key question good. At this assessment the rating has changed to requires improvement. This meant some aspects of the service were not always safe and there was limited assurance about safety. There was an increased risk that people could be harmed.
The service was in breach of the legal regulations in relation to safe care and treatment and governance.
-
Effective
No rating
This means we looked for evidence that people’s care, treatment and support achieved good outcomes and promoted a good quality of life, based on best available evidence.
At our last assessment we rated this key question good. At this assessment the rating has changed to requires improvement. This meant the effectiveness of people’s care, treatment and support did not always achieve good outcomes or was inconsistent.
The service was in breach of the legal regulations in relation to governance.
-
Caring
No rating
This means we looked for evidence the provider involved people and treated them with compassion, kindness, dignity and respect.
At our last assessment we rated this key question good. At this assessment the rating has changed to requires improvement. This meant people did not always feel well-supported, cared for or treated with dignity and respect.
The service was in breach of the legal regulations in relation to governance.
-
Responsive
No rating
This means we looked for evidence the provider met people’s needs.
At our last assessment we rated this key question good. At this assessment the rating has changed to requires improvement. This meant people’s needs were not always met.
The service was in breach of the legal regulations in relation to governance.
-
Well-led
No rating
Well-led – this means we looked for evidence that service leadership, management and governance assured high-quality, person-centred care; supported learning and innovation; and promoted an open, fair culture.
At our last assessment we rated this key question requires improvement. At this assessment the rating has remained requires improvement. This meant the management and leadership was inconsistent. Leaders and the culture they created did not always support the delivery of high-quality, person-centred care.
The service was in breach of legal regulation in relation to governance at the service.
Questions to ask when you visit
- Safe was rated Requires improvement on 19 June 2026. Ask how medicines are managed, how staffing levels are decided and how incidents are reviewed.
- Effective was rated Requires improvement on 19 June 2026. Ask about staff training and how health appointments are arranged.
- Caring was rated Requires improvement on 19 June 2026. Ask how staff protect dignity and how residents are involved in decisions about their care.
- Responsive was rated Requires improvement on 19 June 2026. Ask to see how care plans are kept up to date, how complaints are handled and what activities are on offer.
Registration details
- Registered manager
- Jeanette Hudson
- Registered with the CQC since
- What it provides
- Care home service without nursing
- Who it supports
- Older People
Inspection report
Read the full inspection report (opens the Care Quality Commission website)8 inspection reports, latest 26 February 2022. Latest assessment published 19 June 2026; the Care Quality Commission's newer assessments are published on its website rather than as reports.
The rating is the Care Quality Commission's. We show it as published and do not change it.
Who runs it
- Provider
- Roseville Orchard Court Limited
- Ownership type
- Organisation
- Companies House number
- 07872621 (opens Companies House)
Getting help from East Riding of Yorkshire Council
The council can assess what care someone needs and tell them what help with the cost they may get.
- Adult social care at East Riding of Yorkshire Council
- Ask for a care needs assessment
- Phone: 01482 393939
- Support for carers
- Paying for care: East Riding of Yorkshire Council
Checked on the council's website, November 2026.
Common questions
- Does Orchard Court provide nursing care?
- No. The Care Quality Commission lists Orchard Court as a care home without nursing.
- How many beds does Orchard Court have?
- The Care Quality Commission's register lists 43 beds at Orchard Court.
- When was Orchard Court last inspected?
- The Care Quality Commission's latest rating for Orchard Court was published on 19 June 2026.
- Who runs Orchard Court?
- Orchard Court is run by Roseville Orchard Court Limited.
- What is Orchard Court's CQC rating?
- Its overall rating from the Care Quality Commission is Requires improvement, published on 19 June 2026.
Contact
- Phone
- 01430 421549
- Address
- Bacchus Lane, South Cave, Brough, HU15 2ER Map (opens Google Maps)
Compare nearby
Nearest rated Good or Outstanding: The Green Residential Care Home (Good, 1 mile away) and Westerlands Care Village (Good, 2.5 miles away).
Nearest care homes:
- G The Green Residential Care Home Good, 1 mile away
- G Westerlands Care Village Good, 2.5 miles away
- G Brough Manor Care Home Good, 2.7 miles away
- G Lola's House Residential Home Limited Good, 2.9 miles away
- – Primrose House Care Home Not yet rated, 3.3 miles away