Rated Care Homes

Creative Support - High Street

RI

Requires improvement

Rated on

Rating from the Care Quality Commission.

At a glance

  • 3 ratings

    Its last inspection moved it down from Good to Requires improvement.

  • 6 years

    since the latest rating was published. A rating this old may not show how the service is today.

  • 14 of 69

    rated care homes in Bedford are rated Requires improvement, like this one.

Creative Support - High Street: inspection record

Care home, 6 beds, Bedford

Rated Requires improvement in June 2020, down from Good.

Creative Support - High Street: inspection record: inspection ratings by year, 2015 to 2026
201520162017201820192020202120222023202420252026
Overall
Safe
Effective
Caring
Responsive
Well-led

Ratings published by the Care Quality Commission.

Compare nearby

Nearest rated Good or Outstanding: Milton Ernest Hall Care Home (Good, 1.2 miles away) and Albert House (Good, 1.3 miles away).

Nearest care homes:

  1. G
    Milton Ernest Hall Care Home Good, 1.2 miles away
  2. G
    Albert House Good, 1.3 miles away
  3. RI
    Creative Support - The Glade Requires improvement, 1.8 miles away
  4. G
    Bromham House Good, 2 miles away
  5. –
    Bentley Grange Care Home Not yet rated, 2.2 miles away

See all care homes in Bedford

See all care homes in Bromham

About the service

From the Care Quality Commission's inspection report published 19 June 2020. Quoted under the Open Government Licence.

Creative Support High Street is a residential care home providing personal care for up to six people. It is registered to support people, with a learning disabilities or autistic spectrum disorder, living with dementia, a physical disability, a sensory impairment, younger and older people. At the time of inspection there were six people using this service. Six people were living at the service at the time of the inspection.

Read the rest of CQC's summary

The service is a single storey bungalow. There are six individual bedrooms, shared bathroom facilities, a shared kitchen, lounge and garden area. The office is located within the service.

The service has not been developed and designed in line with the principles and values that underpin Registering the Right Support and other best practice guidance. These are principles that ensure people who use the service can live as full a life as possible and achieve the best outcomes. The principles reflect the need for people with learning disabilities and/or autism to live meaningful lives that include control, choice, and independence. People using the service did not receive planned and co-ordinated person- centred support that was appropriate and inclusive for them.

The service was no bigger than most domestic style properties. It was registered for the support of up to six people. The service was designed prior to building the right support guidance and the provider only took over the service in 2019. However, signs that deliberately identify the service as a care home had not been considered. These included things such as signs at the entrance gate asking for visitors to ring the bell and wait for staff. Industrial bins for various types of hazardous and non-hazardous waste were located at the front of the house and visible from the street. This did not promote people's dignity and respect of their environment.

What inspectors found

People were supported with basic care needs and remained safe from physical harm. However, the service did not ensure sufficient staffing levels to promote interaction and to avoid social isolation. There was limited evidence that people were involved in the planning of their care or encouraged to voice their opinion about the service.

Read the rest of CQC's summary

The ability for people to participate in activities of their choice and a time of their choosing was severely limited by the poor staffing levels. People were only able to go out for around four hours once a week when supported by an external company provided by the council.

People were not supported to have maximum choice and control of their lives and staff did not support them in the least restrictive way possible and in their best interests; the policies and systems in the service did not support this practice. People's rights were not consistently considered and consent for some areas of their life not always sought.

The service didn't always (consistently) apply the principles and values of Registering the Right Support and other best practice guidance. The outcomes for people did not fully reflect the principles and values of Registering the Right Support for the following reasons, there was inconsistent evidence that people had choice and control. People were not supported to live as independently as possible and there was a lack of social inclusion.

People told us they felt safe and were happy living at the service. People were able to access all areas of the service freely. Staff had a good understanding of how to keep people safe.

People were able to access various health and social care professionals as required. People were supported safely with their medicines.

Staff supported and treated people well and with kindness. Staff had a good knowledge of people's needs, likes and dislikes and knew people well. People told us they would complain to the staff or the registered manager if they were upset or treated badly.

People had access to a variety of food and drink and told us they helped to prepare meals and clean up afterwards.

People who used different methods to communicate were supported to do so and staff all understood how to do this.

We have made a recommendation about ensuring people's care records are current, correct and up to date. We have also made a recommendation about ensuring rubbish, furniture and other items are not stored in and around the service.

Questions to ask when you visit

  1. Safe was rated Requires improvement on 19 June 2020. Ask how medicines are managed, how staffing levels are decided and how incidents are reviewed.
  2. Effective was rated Requires improvement on 19 June 2020. Ask about staff training and how health appointments are arranged.
  3. Caring was rated Requires improvement on 19 June 2020. Ask how staff protect dignity and how residents are involved in decisions about their care.
  4. Responsive was rated Requires improvement on 19 June 2020. Ask to see how care plans are kept up to date, how complaints are handled and what activities are on offer.

Registration details

Registered manager
Emily Horne
Registered with the CQC since
What it provides
Care home service without nursing
Who it supports
Dementia, Learning disabilities or autistic spectrum disorder, Older People, Physical Disability, Sensory Impairment, Younger Adults

Inspection report

Read the full inspection report (opens the Care Quality Commission website)

1 inspection report, latest 19 June 2020. The reports are on the Care Quality Commission website.

The rating is the Care Quality Commission's. We show it as published and do not change it.

Who runs it

Provider
Creative Support LimitedBrand: Creative Support Limited
Ownership type
Organisation
Companies House number
IP27440R (opens Companies House)

Creative Support Limited runs 59 services in England, 7 of them in the East of England. 47 are rated Good or Outstanding, 4 are rated Requires improvement or Inadequate and 8 have no rating yet.

Other services run by Creative Support Limited

  1. O
    Creative Support - Doncaster Personalised Services Outstanding. Home care, Doncaster, Yorkshire and the Humber
  2. O
    Creative Support - Thistley Green Outstanding. Home care, Essex
  3. G
  4. G
    Creative Support - Apsley Court Good. Home care, Bromley, London

See all 59 services run by Creative Support Limited

Getting help from Bedford Borough Council

The council can assess what care someone needs and tell them what help with the cost they may get.

Checked on the council's website, November 2026.

Common questions

Does Creative Support - High Street provide nursing care?
No. The Care Quality Commission lists Creative Support - High Street as a care home without nursing.
How many beds does Creative Support - High Street have?
The Care Quality Commission's register lists 6 beds at Creative Support - High Street.
When was Creative Support - High Street last inspected?
The Care Quality Commission's latest rating for Creative Support - High Street was published on 19 June 2020.
Who runs Creative Support - High Street?
Creative Support - High Street is run by Creative Support Limited. It runs 59 services in England, 7 of them in the East of England.
What is Creative Support - High Street's CQC rating?
Its overall rating from the Care Quality Commission is Requires improvement, published on 19 June 2020.

Contact

Address
4 High Street, Oakley, Bedford, MK43 7RG Map (opens Google Maps)
Read the full inspection report (opens the Care Quality Commission website)

Compare nearby

Nearest rated Good or Outstanding: Milton Ernest Hall Care Home (Good, 1.2 miles away) and Albert House (Good, 1.3 miles away).

Nearest care homes:

  1. G
    Milton Ernest Hall Care Home Good, 1.2 miles away
  2. G
    Albert House Good, 1.3 miles away
  3. RI
    Creative Support - The Glade Requires improvement, 1.8 miles away
  4. G
    Bromham House Good, 2 miles away
  5. –
    Bentley Grange Care Home Not yet rated, 2.2 miles away

See all care homes in Bedford

See all care homes in Bromham