Rated Care Homes

Wasdale Court

RI

Requires improvement

Rated on

Rating from the Care Quality Commission.

At a glance

  • 3 ratings

    Its last inspection moved it down from Good to Requires improvement.

  • 15 months

    since the latest rating was published.

  • 20 of 72

    rated care homes in Hull are rated Requires improvement, like this one.

Wasdale Court: inspection record

Care home, 9 beds, Hull

Rated Requires improvement in July 2025, down from Good.

Wasdale Court: inspection record: inspection ratings by year, 2015 to 2026
201520162017201820192020202120222023202420252026
Overall
Safe
Effective
Caring
Responsive
Well-led

Ratings published by the Care Quality Commission.

Compare nearby

Nearest rated Good or Outstanding: The Legard (Good, 0.1 miles away) and Landau Lodge (Good, 0.1 miles away).

Nearest care homes:

  1. G
    The Legard Good, 0.1 miles away
  2. G
    Landau Lodge Good, 0.1 miles away
  3. G
    Berkeley House Good, 0.4 miles away
  4. –
    Same Difference Not yet rated, 0.6 miles away
  5. RI
    Longhill House Care Home Requires improvement, 0.7 miles away

See all care homes in Hull

See all care homes in Summergangs

What inspectors found

From the Care Quality Commission's assessment published 23 July 2025 (assessment visit 3 April 2025). Quoted under the Open Government Licence.

Date of assessment: 28 April to 20 May 2025. The assessment was undertaken in response to concerns received about the service. Wasdale Court is a residential care home supporting people with a learning disability and / or autistic people. At the time of the assessment there were 7 people living at the service.

  • Safe No rating
  • Effective No rating
  • Caring Good
  • Responsive Good
  • Well-led No rating
Read the rest of CQC's summary

We have assessed the service against ‘Right support, right care, right culture’ guidance to make judgements about whether the provider guaranteed people with a learning disability and autistic people respect, equality, dignity, choices, independence and good access to local communities that most people take for granted.

Systems and processes were not always effective in identifying concerns or supporting the service to manage quality and drive improvements. There had been a significant turnover of staff which had impacted the people who used the service. New staff had recently been recruited and the provider used agency staff to support people and ensure safe staffing numbers. Areas of the service required refurbishment. When actions had been identified by the provider, these had not always been completed in a timely manner including risks associated with fire doors. Risk management practices were not consistent and the provider did not always ensure staff had received the specialised training to deliver personalised care.

However, we received positive feedback about the new registered manager. A professional told us, “I have been very impressed by the registered manager. They have proved resilient under a good deal of pressure, expresses compassion and concern for the individuals who live at Wasdale Court, and seems to be well across the wider management of the service.” The staff team felt supported and received supervisions and appraisals. Managers and staff shared information with the relevant professionals to try and promote collaborative working. The staff team understood their safeguarding responsibilities and expressed genuine care for the people they supported. The staff team reflected things were improving at the service. There were procedures in place to ensure people received their medicines safely. The management team were open and honest with us during the assessment and were responsive to our feedback.

There was a breach of regulation relating to the governance of the service. We have asked the provider for an action plan in response to the concerns found at this assessment.

  1. Safe

    No rating

    This means we looked for evidence that people were protected from abuse and avoidable harm. At our last assessment we rated this key question good. At this assessment the rating has changed to requires improvement. This meant some aspects of the service were not always safe and there was limited assurance about safety. There was an increased risk that people could be harmed.

  2. Effective

    No rating

    This means we looked for evidence that people’s care, treatment and support achieved good outcomes and promoted a good quality of life, based on best available evidence.

    At our last assessment we rated this key question good. At this assessment the rating has changed to requires improvement. This meant the effectiveness of people’s care, treatment and support did not always achieve good outcomes or was inconsistent.

  3. Caring

    Good

    This means we looked for evidence that the provider involved people and treated them with compassion, kindness, dignity and respect. This key question was last rated good. At this assessment the rating has remained good. This meant people were supported and treated with dignity and respect; and involved as partners in their care.

  4. Responsive

    Good

    This means we looked for evidence that the provider met people’s needs.

    This key question was last rated good. At this assessment the rating has remained good. This meant people’s needs were met through good organisation and delivery.

  5. Well-led

    No rating

    This means we looked for evidence that service leadership, management and governance assured high-quality, person-centred care; supported learning and innovation; and promoted an open, fair culture. At our last assessment we rated this key question good. At this assessment the rating has changed to requires improvement. This meant the management and leadership was inconsistent. Leaders and the culture they created did not always support the delivery of high-quality, person-centred care.

    The service was in breach of legal regulation in relation to governance at the service.

Questions to ask when you visit

  1. Safe was rated Requires improvement on 23 July 2025. Ask how medicines are managed, how staffing levels are decided and how incidents are reviewed.
  2. Effective was rated Requires improvement on 23 July 2025. Ask about staff training and how health appointments are arranged.
  3. Well-led was rated Requires improvement on 23 July 2025. Ask about changes in management and what has changed since the report.

Registration details

Registered manager
Laura Lockett
Registered with the CQC since
What it provides
Care home service without nursing
Who it supports
Learning disabilities or autistic spectrum disorder, Mental Health, Physical Disability, Younger Adults

Inspection report

Read the full inspection report (opens the Care Quality Commission website)

2 inspection reports, latest 16 November 2022. Latest assessment published 23 July 2025; the Care Quality Commission's newer assessments are published on its website rather than as reports.

The rating is the Care Quality Commission's. We show it as published and do not change it.

Who runs it

Provider
Newfound Care LtdBrand: Voyage
Ownership type
Organisation
Companies House number
11695724 (opens Companies House)

Newfound Care Ltd runs 2 services, all in Yorkshire and the Humber. 1 is rated Good or Outstanding and 1 is rated Requires improvement or Inadequate.

Other services run by Newfound Care Ltd

  1. G
    Barton House Good. Care home, North Lincolnshire

Getting help from Hull City Council

The council can assess what care someone needs and tell them what help with the cost they may get.

Checked on the council's website, November 2026.

Common questions

Does Wasdale Court provide nursing care?
No. The Care Quality Commission lists Wasdale Court as a care home without nursing.
How many beds does Wasdale Court have?
The Care Quality Commission's register lists 9 beds at Wasdale Court.
When was Wasdale Court last inspected?
The Care Quality Commission's latest rating for Wasdale Court was published on 23 July 2025.
Who runs Wasdale Court?
Wasdale Court is run by Newfound Care Ltd. It runs 2 services, all in Yorkshire and the Humber.
What is Wasdale Court's CQC rating?
Its overall rating from the Care Quality Commission is Requires improvement, published on 23 July 2025.

Contact

Phone
01482 014366
Address
Wasdale Avenue, Hull, HU9 4HZ Map (opens Google Maps)
Read the full inspection report (opens the Care Quality Commission website)

Compare nearby

Nearest rated Good or Outstanding: The Legard (Good, 0.1 miles away) and Landau Lodge (Good, 0.1 miles away).

Nearest care homes:

  1. G
    The Legard Good, 0.1 miles away
  2. G
    Landau Lodge Good, 0.1 miles away
  3. G
    Berkeley House Good, 0.4 miles away
  4. –
    Same Difference Not yet rated, 0.6 miles away
  5. RI
    Longhill House Care Home Requires improvement, 0.7 miles away

See all care homes in Hull

See all care homes in Summergangs