Rated Care Homes

Crimson Manor

G

Good

Rated on

Rating from the Care Quality Commission.

At a glance

  • 7 ratings

    Its last inspection improved it from Inadequate to Good.

  • 1 month

    since the latest rating was published.

  • 89 of 119

    rated care homes in Kirklees are rated Good, like this one.

Crimson Manor: inspection record

Care home, 20 beds, Kirklees

Rated Good in September 2026, up from Inadequate.

Crimson Manor: inspection record: inspection ratings by year, 2015 to 2026
201520162017201820192020202120222023202420252026
Overall
Safe
Effective
Caring
Responsive
Well-led

Ratings published by the Care Quality Commission.

Compare nearby

  1. G
    Cragside Good, less than 0.1 miles away
  2. G
    The Lodge Good, less than 0.1 miles away
  3. G
    Botham Hall Good, 0.1 miles away
  4. G
    Carlton Autistic Care Centre Good, 0.2 miles away
  5. G
    Carlton Specialist Care Centre Good, 0.2 miles away

See all care homes in Kirklees

See all care homes in Lower Wellhouse

What inspectors found

From the Care Quality Commission's assessment published 10 September 2026 (assessment visit 4 June 2026). Quoted under the Open Government Licence.

Dates of assessment: 22 to 24 July 2026. We visited the service on the 22 and 23 July 2026.Crimson Manor provides accommodation and personal care for up to 20 older people, some of whom may be living with dementia. At the time of the assessment, 18 people were living at the service.

  • Safe Good
  • Effective Good
  • Caring Good
  • Responsive Good
  • Well-led Good
Read the rest of CQC's summary

The last comprehensive assessment was carried out in January and February 2025, and the service was rated inadequate. Breaches of 5 legal regulations were recorded in relation to safe care and treatment, dignity and respect, premises and equipment, staffing and good governance. At this assessment we found the provider was not in breach of these regulations.

People received personalised care from staff who knew them well, had a good understanding of their needs and treated them with kindness, respect and compassion. Care records were person centred focusing on the individual’s desired outcomes and providing staff with clear guidance on how to deliver care and support safely and consistently.

There were enough staff to meet people’s needs and a presence was maintained in communal areas. Staff were trained, received regular supervision and worked well together as a team. Medicines were managed safely. Risks to people were assessed and mitigated. Safeguarding processes were robust, with good oversight of Deprivation of Liberty [DoLS] applications.

People’s nutritional needs were met with a good variety of homemade meals, snacks and drinks provided, including daily freshly baked bread. A range of activities were provided both in-house and out in the community.

The home was clean, odours identified in 2 rooms were addressed promptly. Staff wore PPE and hand hygiene facilities were available throughout the home. Infection prevention guidance regarding staff nail coverings had been adapted by the provider rather than fully aligned with best practice guidance.

Parts of the environment had been refurbished including a new bathroom and upgraded laundry facilities. Some environmental concerns identified during the assessment were addressed promptly. Personal emergency evacuation plans were held electronically within care records and the provider confirmed these records could still be accessed in the event of an internet connectivity failure.

Governance arrangements were effective, with comprehensive audits, digital compliance systems and improvement plans supporting quality monitoring and service development. A new registered manager had recently joined the service and worked alongside the existing registered manager, who is also the provider.

This service has been in Special Measures since 28 November 2025. The service is no longer rated as inadequate overall or in any of the key questions. Therefore, this service is no longer in Special Measures.

  1. Safe

    Good

    Safe – this means we looked for evidence that people were protected from abuse and avoidable harm. At our last assessment we rated this key question Inadequate. At this assessment the rating has changed to Good. This meant people were safe and protected from avoidable harm.

    At our last assessment we recorded breaches of legal regulations in relation to safe care and treatment, premises and equipment and safe and effective staffing. At this assessment we found the provider was not in breach of these regulations.

  2. Effective

    Good

    Effective – this means we looked for evidence that people’s care, treatment and support achieved good outcomes and promoted a good quality of life, based on best available evidence.At our last assessment we rated this key question Requires improvement. At this assessment the rating has changed to Good. This meant people’s outcomes were consistently good, and people’s feedback confirmed this.

  3. Caring

    Good

    Caring – this means we looked for evidence that the provider involved people and treated them with compassion, kindness, dignity and respect. At our last assessment we rated this key question Requires improvement. At this assessment the rating has changed to Good. This meant people were supported and treated with dignity and respect; and involved as partners in their care.

    At our last assessment we recorded a breach of legal regulation in relation to dignity and respect. At this assessment we found the provider was not in breach of this regulation.

  4. Responsive

    Good

    Responsive – this means we looked for evidence that the provider met people’s needs.At our last assessment we rated this key question Requires improvement. At this assessment the rating has changed to Good. This meant people’s needs were met through good organisation and delivery.

  5. Well-led

    Good

    Well-led – this means we looked for evidence that service leadership, management and governance assured high-quality, person-centred care; supported learning and innovation; and promoted an open, fair culture. At our last assessment we rated this key question Inadequate. At this assessment the rating has changed to Good. This meant the service was consistently managed and well-led. Leaders and the culture they created promoted high-quality, person-centred care.

    At our last assessment we recorded a breach of legal regulation in relation to good governance. At this assessment we found the provider was not in breach of this regulation.

Questions to ask when you visit

  1. Ask to see the most recent Care Quality Commission (CQC) report and what the home did about any points in it.
  2. Visit at different times of day, including a mealtime.

Registration details

Registered manager
Tina Sanderson
Registered with the CQC since
What it provides
Care home service without nursing
Who it supports
Dementia, Older People

Inspection report

Read the full inspection report (opens the Care Quality Commission website)

6 inspection reports, latest 21 July 2022. Latest assessment published 10 September 2026; the Care Quality Commission's newer assessments are published on its website rather than as reports.

The rating is the Care Quality Commission's. We show it as published and do not change it.

Who runs it

Ownership type
Organisation
Companies House number
08231484 (opens Companies House)

Getting help from Kirklees Council

The council can assess what care someone needs and tell them what help with the cost they may get.

Checked on the council's website, November 2026.

Common questions

Does Crimson Manor provide nursing care?
No. The Care Quality Commission lists Crimson Manor as a care home without nursing.
How many beds does Crimson Manor have?
The Care Quality Commission's register lists 20 beds at Crimson Manor.
When was Crimson Manor last inspected?
The Care Quality Commission's latest rating for Crimson Manor was published on 10 September 2026.
Who runs Crimson Manor?
Crimson Manor is run by Crimson Care Limited.
What is Crimson Manor's CQC rating?
Its overall rating from the Care Quality Commission is Good, published on 10 September 2026.

Contact

Phone
07468 010710
Address
185 Scar Lane, Milnsbridge, Huddersfield, HD3 4PZ Map (opens Google Maps)
Read the full inspection report (opens the Care Quality Commission website)

Compare nearby

  1. G
    Cragside Good, less than 0.1 miles away
  2. G
    The Lodge Good, less than 0.1 miles away
  3. G
    Botham Hall Good, 0.1 miles away
  4. G
    Carlton Autistic Care Centre Good, 0.2 miles away
  5. G
    Carlton Specialist Care Centre Good, 0.2 miles away

See all care homes in Kirklees

See all care homes in Lower Wellhouse