Rated Care Homes

Watts Healthcare Ltd

G

Good

Rated on

Rating from the Care Quality Commission.

At a glance

  • 1 rating

    Only one rating on record, so there is no trend to show yet.

  • 5 years

    since the latest rating was published. A rating this old may not show how the service is today.

  • 42 of 59

    rated care homes in Medway are rated Good, like this one.

Watts Healthcare Ltd: inspection record

Care home, 32 beds, Medway

Rated Good in June 2021.

Watts Healthcare Ltd: inspection record: inspection ratings by year, 2015 to 2026
201520162017201820192020202120222023202420252026
Overall
Safe
Effective
Caring
Responsive
Well-led

Ratings published by the Care Quality Commission.

Compare nearby

  1. G
    Rochester House Good, less than 0.1 miles away
  2. RI
    Welcome House - Nickleby Lodge Requires improvement, 0.2 miles away
  3. RI
    Welcome House - The Chestnuts Requires improvement, 0.3 miles away
  4. RI
    Sinon House Therapeutic Unit Requires improvement, 0.4 miles away
  5. –
    St Williams Not yet rated, 0.8 miles away

See all care homes in Medway

See all care homes in Rochester

About the service

From the Care Quality Commission's inspection report published 17 June 2021. Quoted under the Open Government Licence.

Watts Healthcare Ltd, also known as Sherwood House, is a residential care home providing personal care to 15 people at the time of the inspection. People were aged 65 and over and younger adults with care needs. Some people had physical disabilities and mental health needs. One person was cared for in bed. One person was in hospital at the time of the inspection. The service can support up to 32 people.

What inspectors found

People looked relaxed and happy, there was plenty of laughter, fun and interaction. People told us, "I love it. I want to stay here for the rest of my life" and "We do have some fun here." Relatives told us, "I saw mum on Tuesday, it made me very happy to see mum looking so well"; "Hand on my heart [it was the] best decision for mum [to live at the service]"; "[It is an] incredible place" and "Ten stars for them."

Read the rest of CQC's summary

We were not assured that the provider had been admitting people safely to the service. People had not always been isolated for the required amount of time on admission. We signposted the provider to resources to develop their approach. Staff wore personal protective equipment (PPE) and followed guidance to make sure this was disposed of safely. Staff had access to PPE whenever they needed it. The service was clean, and all areas of the service were regularly cleaned.

Systems to manage the risk of legionella infection were not robust. Empty room flushing had not been carried out as required. The registered manager made improvement to the processes and systems within the service during the inspection, such as implementing the required water flushing of empty rooms. They also arranged for a contractor to attend the service and carry out a legionella risk assessment and checks.

People were protected from abuse and avoidable harm. Staff had received training to make sure they had the information they needed to keep people safe. Risks to people's individual health and wellbeing had been assessed and were well managed. People's medicines were well managed. If people or their relatives wanted to complain they knew how to do so.

People were supported to have maximum choice and control of their lives and staff supported them in the least restrictive way possible and in their best interests; the policies and systems in the service supported this practice.

The service was well-led. The management team carried out the appropriate checks to ensure that the quality of the service was continuously reviewed, improved and evolved to meet people's changing needs. The registered manager promoted an open culture and was a visible presence in the service, staff felt listened to and valued.

People were treated with dignity and respect. People's views about how they preferred to receive their care were listened to and respected. People told us staff were kind and caring.

People had access to a range of different activities throughout the week. People told us that they took part in these and that they were enjoyable. Activities were also provided for people who received their care and treatment in bed.

People received good quality care, support and treatment including when they reached the end of their lives. People had been involved in planning and discussions about their wishes and preferences in relation to their end of life care.

When people needed medical attention, this was quickly identified, and appropriate action was taken. For example, if people were losing weight referrals were made to dieticians, or if people fell regularly, they were referred to a fall's clinic.

Questions to ask when you visit

  1. Safe was rated Requires improvement on 17 June 2021. Ask how medicines are managed, how staffing levels are decided and how incidents are reviewed.
  2. The last rating is 5 years old. Ask what has changed since then.
  3. Ask to see the most recent Care Quality Commission (CQC) report and what the home did about any points in it.

Registration details

Registered manager
Vikki Viles
Registered with the CQC since
What it provides
Care home service without nursing
Who it supports
Dementia, Older People, Physical Disability, Sensory Impairment, Younger Adults

Inspection report

Read the full inspection report (opens the Care Quality Commission website)

1 inspection report, latest 17 June 2021. The reports are on the Care Quality Commission website.

The rating is the Care Quality Commission's. We show it as published and do not change it.

Who runs it

Ownership type
Organisation
Companies House number
08268746 (opens Companies House)

Getting help from Medway Council

The council can assess what care someone needs and tell them what help with the cost they may get.

Checked on the council's website, November 2026.

Common questions

Does Watts Healthcare Ltd provide nursing care?
No. The Care Quality Commission lists Watts Healthcare Ltd as a care home without nursing.
How many beds does Watts Healthcare Ltd have?
The Care Quality Commission's register lists 32 beds at Watts Healthcare Ltd.
When was Watts Healthcare Ltd last inspected?
The Care Quality Commission's latest rating for Watts Healthcare Ltd was published on 17 June 2021.
Who runs Watts Healthcare Ltd?
Watts Healthcare Ltd is run by Watts Healthcare Limited.
What is Watts Healthcare Ltd's CQC rating?
Its overall rating from the Care Quality Commission is Good, published on 17 June 2021.

Contact

Phone
01634 326865
Address
209-211, Maidstone Road, Rochester, ME1 3BU Map (opens Google Maps)
Read the full inspection report (opens the Care Quality Commission website)

Compare nearby

  1. G
    Rochester House Good, less than 0.1 miles away
  2. RI
    Welcome House - Nickleby Lodge Requires improvement, 0.2 miles away
  3. RI
    Welcome House - The Chestnuts Requires improvement, 0.3 miles away
  4. RI
    Sinon House Therapeutic Unit Requires improvement, 0.4 miles away
  5. –
    St Williams Not yet rated, 0.8 miles away

See all care homes in Medway

See all care homes in Rochester