Rated Care Homes

Hunters Creek Care Home

G

Good

Rated on

Rating from the Care Quality Commission.

At a glance

  • 5 ratings

    First rated Good in 2016, most recently Good in July 2026.

  • 4 months

    since the latest rating was published.

  • 177 of 254

    rated care homes in Lincolnshire are rated Good, like this one.

Hunters Creek Care Home: inspection record

Care home with nursing, 89 beds, Lincolnshire

Rated Good in July 2026.

Hunters Creek Care Home: inspection record: inspection ratings by year, 2015 to 2026
201520162017201820192020202120222023202420252026
Overall
Safe
Effective
Caring
Responsive
Well-led

Ratings published by the Care Quality Commission.

Compare nearby

  1. G
    Boston West Care Good, 0.4 miles away
  2. G
    Avocet House Care Home Good, 0.5 miles away
  3. G
    Manor Gate Care Home Good, 0.8 miles away
  4. –
    Westfield Nursing Home Not yet rated, 1 mile away
  5. G
    Elmwood House Nursing Home Good, 1 mile away

See all care homes in Lincolnshire

See all care homes in Wyberton

What inspectors found

From the Care Quality Commission's assessment published 1 July 2026 (assessment visit 5 March 2026). Quoted under the Open Government Licence.

Date of inspection: 27 May to 10 June 2026. Hunters Creek Care Home is a care home with nursing supporting adults of all ages. Some people are living with dementia or physical disabilities. At the time of the inspection, the service supported 87 people with the regulated activity. We inspected this service due to concerns about management of risk and quality of care. We did not find evidence to support those concerns. While there were some areas in the process of being improved, risks were being well managed and we had no concerns about the quality of care being provided.

  • Safe Good
  • Effective Good
  • Caring Good
  • Responsive Good
  • Well-led Good
Read the rest of CQC's summary

Systems were in place to manage risks, safeguard people and monitor incidents. Staff knew how to report concerns and people felt safe. Improvements were needed in how staff supported people who experienced distress and in aspects of the environment. Medicines and infection control were mostly well managed, though some recording and environmental issues remained. Staffing was stable, but staff confidence and availability did not always meet people’s needs.

People’s needs were assessed and care plans were detailed and focused on health and wellbeing. Staff worked with professionals and used recognised tools to support people’s health. People were supported with eating, drinking and their health needs. Some inconsistencies in records and monitoring were identified, although partnership working was strong.

Staff were kind and people were treated with compassion. The atmosphere was friendly and feedback about staff was positive. Improvements were needed in privacy, respectful language and ensuring all interactions upheld dignity. Staff knew people well and relationships were positive.

People were not always supported in a timely or consistent way, particularly when they experienced distress. Person centred care and meaningful engagement were developing but not always consistent. There were positive examples of personalised activities. Systems were in place to respond to complaints and feedback.

Leaders were knowledgeable, approachable and committed to improvement. Governance systems were in place and becoming more focused on people’s experiences. Staff felt supported and there was an open culture. Improvements were ongoing and not all systems were fully embedded.

  1. Safe

    Good

    Safe – this means we looked for evidence that people were protected from abuse and avoidable harm. At our last assessment we rated this key question good. At this assessment the rating has remained good. This meant people were safe and protected from avoidable harm.

  2. Effective

    Good

    Effective – this means we looked for evidence that people’s care, treatment and support achieved good outcomes and promoted a good quality of life, based on best available evidence. At our last assessment we rated this key question good. At this assessment the rating has remained good. This meant people’s outcomes were consistently good, and people’s feedback confirmed this.

  3. Caring

    Good

    Caring – this means we looked for evidence that the provider involved people and treated them with compassion, kindness, dignity and respect. At our last assessment we rated this key question good. At this assessment the rating has remained good. This meant people were supported and treated with dignity and respect; and involved as partners in their care.

  4. Responsive

    Good

    Responsive – this means we looked for evidence that the provider met people’s needs.

    At our last assessment we rated this key question good. At this assessment the rating has remained good. This meant people’s needs were met through good organisation and delivery.

  5. Well-led

    Good

    Well-led – this means we looked for evidence that service leadership, management and governance assured high-quality, person-centred care; supported learning and innovation; and promoted an open, fair culture. At our last assessment we rated this key question good. At this assessment the rating has remained good. This meant the service was consistently managed and well-led. Leaders and the culture they created promoted high-quality, person-centred care.

Questions to ask when you visit

  1. Ask how nursing cover works at night and at weekends.
  2. Ask to see the most recent Care Quality Commission (CQC) report and what the home did about any points in it.
  3. Visit at different times of day, including a mealtime.

Registration details

Registered manager
Rebecca Yeomans
Registered with the CQC since
What it provides
Care home service with nursing
Who it supports
Dementia, Mental Health, Older People, Physical Disability, Sensory Impairment, Younger Adults

Inspection report

Read the full inspection report (opens the Care Quality Commission website)

3 inspection reports, latest 16 December 2022. Latest assessment published 1 July 2026; the Care Quality Commission's newer assessments are published on its website rather than as reports.

The rating is the Care Quality Commission's. We show it as published and do not change it.

Who runs it

Provider
Tanglewood Care Services LimitedBrand: Tanglewood Care Homes
Ownership type
Organisation
Companies House number
09618366 (opens Companies House)

Tanglewood Care Services Limited runs 6 services, all in the East Midlands. 5 are rated Good or Outstanding and 1 is rated Requires improvement or Inadequate.

Other services run by Tanglewood Care Services Limited

  1. G
    Sandpiper Care Home Good. Care home, Lincolnshire
  2. G
    Tanglewood Care Home Good. Care home with nursing, Lincolnshire
  3. G
    Tanglewood Cloverleaf Good. Care home with nursing, Lincolnshire
  4. G
    Toray Pines Care Home Good. Care home, Lincolnshire

See all 6 services run by Tanglewood Care Services Limited

Getting help from Lincolnshire County Council

The council can assess what care someone needs and tell them what help with the cost they may get.

Checked on the council's website, November 2026.

Common questions

Does Hunters Creek Care Home provide nursing care?
Yes. The Care Quality Commission lists Hunters Creek Care Home as a care home with nursing.
How many beds does Hunters Creek Care Home have?
The Care Quality Commission's register lists 89 beds at Hunters Creek Care Home.
When was Hunters Creek Care Home last inspected?
The Care Quality Commission's latest rating for Hunters Creek Care Home was published on 1 July 2026.
Who runs Hunters Creek Care Home?
Hunters Creek Care Home is run by Tanglewood Care Services Limited. It runs 6 services, all in the East Midlands.
What is Hunters Creek Care Home's CQC rating?
Its overall rating from the Care Quality Commission is Good, published on 1 July 2026.