Rated Care Homes

Stonesby House LTD

RI

Requires improvement

Rated on

Rating from the Care Quality Commission.

At a glance

  • 6 ratings

    Its last inspection improved it from Inadequate to Requires improvement.

  • 5 years

    since the latest rating was published. A rating this old may not show how the service is today.

  • 18 of 90

    rated care homes in Leicester are rated Requires improvement, like this one.

Stonesby House LTD: inspection record

Care home, 14 beds, Leicester

Rated Requires improvement in June 2021, up from Inadequate.

Stonesby House LTD: inspection record: inspection ratings by year, 2015 to 2026
201520162017201820192020202120222023202420252026
Overall
Safe
Effective
Caring
Responsive
Well-led

Ratings published by the Care Quality Commission.

Compare nearby

Nearest rated Good or Outstanding: Amberwood Care Home Limited (Good, 0.5 miles away) and Cooper House (Good, 0.6 miles away).

Nearest care homes:

  1. RI
    Stonesby House Requires improvement, less than 0.1 miles away
  2. –
    Stonesby Lodge Not yet rated, less than 0.1 miles away
  3. G
    Amberwood Care Home Limited Good, 0.5 miles away
  4. G
    Cooper House Good, 0.6 miles away
  5. G
    Holmes Court Care Home Good, 0.7 miles away

See all care homes in Leicester

See all care homes in Central Leicester

About the service

From the Care Quality Commission's inspection report published 9 June 2021. Quoted under the Open Government Licence.

Stonesby House Ltd is a residential care home registered to provide accommodation and personal care for up to 14 adults who may be living with mental health needs and/or learning disabilities or autistic spectrum disorder. At the time of our inspection, 12 people were using the service.

Read the rest of CQC's summary

The home is divided into two separate units, each of which has separate adapted facilities.

What inspectors found

Further improvements were needed to the risk assessments and care plans to make sure they contained detailed guidance for staff to follow. The registered manager told us they were still working on these, so they had not been reviewed for everyone living at the service.

Read the rest of CQC's summary

Although improvements had been made to the infection control procedures, we found some areas that still needed to be addressed to ensure people were safe from the spread of infection. Further improvements were needed to the systems in place to administer medicines safely to make sure people received their medicines safely and as prescribed.

Improvements had been made to the provider's governance systems and they carried out a variety of internal audits to check the quality and safety of the support people received. However, these needed to be strengthened because they were not always effective at identifying areas where improvement was needed.

We found numerous items of food that were out of date and some foods that had been opened but with no opening date recorded on them. Pre-cooked meals had been frozen with no date of when they were frozen. Environmental audits had failed to identify that the first aid kit contained out of date products such as bandages and a burn shield.

Staff interactions had improved, and we saw some staff who had a good rapport with people. However, we found that many staff interactions were still task focused and lacked a person-centred approach.

Systems in place to safeguard people from avoidable harm had been reviewed and enhanced to ensure people were protected. Staff told us they had completed training about safeguarding and whistle blowing to support people to stay safe. Staff had completed Non-Abusive Psychological and Physical Intervention (NAPPI) training to ensure they had the knowledge, skills and confidence to prevent, decelerate, and deescalate crisis situations so that restrictive practices could be avoided.

The provider and the registered manager had improved their recruitment procedures to ensure people were protected from staff that may not be suitable to support them. Systems in place to assess people's needs and determine staffing numbers had been reviewed and improvements made. We found there were sufficient staff to meet people's needs.

The systems in place regarding the management of Legionella had improved. We saw that some staff had completed training around Legionella management and records of water temperatures were in place.

We expect health and social care providers to guarantee autistic people and people with a learning disability the choices, dignity, independence and good access to local communities that most people take for granted. Right support, right care, right culture is the guidance CQC follows to make assessments and judgements about services providing support to people with a learning disability and/or autistic people.

The service was not able to fully demonstrate how they were meeting some of the underpinning principles of Right support, right care, right culture. People did not always receive person-centred care and treatment that was appropriate to meet their needs and reflected their personal preferences. Their care and support did not always promote enablement, independence, choice and inclusion.

Questions to ask when you visit

  1. Safe was rated Requires improvement on 9 June 2021. Ask how medicines are managed, how staffing levels are decided and how incidents are reviewed.
  2. Well-led was rated Requires improvement on 9 June 2021. Ask about changes in management and what has changed since the report.
  3. The last rating is 5 years old. Ask what has changed since then.

Registration details

Registered manager
Abigail Wilson
Registered with the CQC since
What it provides
Care home service without nursing
Who it supports
Dementia, Learning disabilities or autistic spectrum disorder, Mental Health, Older People, People who misuse drugs and alcohol, Physical Disability, Sensory Impairment, Younger Adults

Inspection report

Read the full inspection report (opens the Care Quality Commission website)

6 inspection reports, latest 9 June 2021. The reports are on the Care Quality Commission website.

The rating is the Care Quality Commission's. We show it as published and do not change it.

Who runs it

Ownership type
Organisation
Companies House number
06647507 (opens Companies House)

Stonesby House Ltd runs 2 services, all in the East Midlands. 0 are rated Good or Outstanding and 2 are rated Requires improvement or Inadequate.

Other services run by Stonesby House Ltd

  1. RI
    Stonesby House Requires improvement. Care home, Leicester

Getting help from Leicester City Council

The council can assess what care someone needs and tell them what help with the cost they may get.

Checked on the council's website, November 2026.

Common questions

Does Stonesby House LTD provide nursing care?
No. The Care Quality Commission lists Stonesby House LTD as a care home without nursing.
How many beds does Stonesby House LTD have?
The Care Quality Commission's register lists 14 beds at Stonesby House LTD.
When was Stonesby House LTD last inspected?
The Care Quality Commission's latest rating for Stonesby House LTD was published on 9 June 2021.
Who runs Stonesby House LTD?
Stonesby House LTD is run by Stonesby House Ltd. It runs 2 services, all in the East Midlands.
What is Stonesby House LTD's CQC rating?
Its overall rating from the Care Quality Commission is Requires improvement, published on 9 June 2021.

Contact

Address
107 Stonesby Avenue, Leicester, LE2 6TY Map (opens Google Maps)
Read the full inspection report (opens the Care Quality Commission website)

Compare nearby

Nearest rated Good or Outstanding: Amberwood Care Home Limited (Good, 0.5 miles away) and Cooper House (Good, 0.6 miles away).

Nearest care homes:

  1. RI
    Stonesby House Requires improvement, less than 0.1 miles away
  2. –
    Stonesby Lodge Not yet rated, less than 0.1 miles away
  3. G
    Amberwood Care Home Limited Good, 0.5 miles away
  4. G
    Cooper House Good, 0.6 miles away
  5. G
    Holmes Court Care Home Good, 0.7 miles away

See all care homes in Leicester

See all care homes in Central Leicester