Rated Care Homes

Medistaff24

G

Good

Rated on

Rating from the Care Quality Commission.

At a glance

  • 2 ratings

    Its last inspection improved it from Requires improvement to Good.

  • 7 months

    since the latest rating was published.

  • 70 of 83

    rated home care services in Worcestershire are rated Good, like this one.

Medistaff24: inspection record

Home care, Worcestershire

Rated Good in April 2026, up from Requires improvement.

Medistaff24: inspection record: inspection ratings by year, 2015 to 2026
201520162017201820192020202120222023202420252026
Overall
Safe
Effective
Caring
Responsive
Well-led

Ratings published by the Care Quality Commission.

What inspectors found

From the Care Quality Commission's assessment published 1 April 2026 (assessment visit 6 January 2026). Quoted under the Open Government Licence.

Date of assessment: 29 January to 19 February 2026.

Medistaff24 is a domiciliary care agency registered to provide personal care to people in their homes. The service supports older people, younger adults, people with a learning disability and those living with a sensory impairment, physical disability or dementia. At the time of our assessment 12 people were receiving a regulated activity. We assessed the service against ‘Right support, right care, right culture’. This guidance supported judgements about whether the provider guaranteed people with a learning disability and autistic people respect, equality, dignity, choice, independence and access to local communities that most people take for granted.

  • Safe Good
  • Effective Good
  • Caring Good
  • Responsive Good
  • Well-led Good
Read the rest of CQC's summary

This announced inspection was carried out to review the quality of care and the service’s compliance with legal requirements.

Right Care

People’s care plans contained detailed and personalised information. Care was person-centred, and people were involved in decisions about their support. The service helped people maintain their health and wellbeing and promoted independence. People told us staff listened to them and responded quickly when they raised questions or concerns.

Right Culture

The service placed emphasis on staff engagement, wellbeing and enablement, supporting staff to deliver compassionate, person-centred care. Leaders promoted an open, inclusive culture, and staff told us they felt valued and able to approach management with any concerns.

Right support

Care was consistently provided in a way that was safe and met people's needs. Some aspects of people's care records needed to be improved. Mental capacity assessments were not always detailed and instructions to staff on administering certain PRN (as required) medicines were also not always clear. There was no evidence of this impacting on the care people received but more robust records would strengthen the information to support staff decision making and safe and effective medicines management.

Governance systems were in place; however, we were not assured they were always effective in identifying shortfalls in quality, performance and risk.

  1. Safe

    Good

    Safe – this means we looked for evidence that people were protected from abuse and avoidable harm.

    At our last assessment we rated this key question requires improvement. At this assessment the rating has changed to good.

    This meant people were safe and protected from avoidable harm.

  2. Effective

    Good

    Effective – this means we looked for evidence that people’s care, treatment and support achieved good outcomes and promoted a good quality of life, based on best available evidence.

    At our last assessment we rated this key question good. At this assessment the rating has remained good.

    This meant people’s outcomes were consistently good, and people’s feedback confirmed this.

  3. Caring

    Good

    Caring – this means we looked for evidence that the provider involved people and treated them with compassion, kindness, dignity and respect.

    At our last assessment we rated this key question good. At this assessment the rating has remained good.

    This meant people were supported and treated with dignity and respect; and involved as partners in their care.

  4. Responsive

    Good

    Responsive – this means we looked for evidence that the provider met people’s needs.

    At our last assessment we rated this key question good. At this assessment the rating has remained good.

    This meant people’s needs were met through good organisation and delivery.

  5. Well-led

    Good

    Well-led – this means we looked for evidence that service leadership, management and governance assured high-quality, person-centred care; supported learning and innovation; and promoted an open, fair culture.

    At our last assessment we rated this key question requires improvement. At this assessment the rating has changed to good.

    This meant the service was consistently managed and well-led. Leaders and the culture they created promoted high-quality, person-centred care.

Questions to ask the service

  1. Ask to see the most recent Care Quality Commission (CQC) report and what the service did about any points in it.
  2. Ask how visit times are agreed and who covers when your usual carer is away.

Registration details

Registered manager
Hrisa Dimitrova
Registered with the CQC since
What it provides
Domiciliary care service
Who it supports
Dementia, Learning disabilities or autistic spectrum disorder, Older People, Younger Adults

Inspection report

Read the full inspection report (opens the Care Quality Commission website)

1 inspection report, latest 22 December 2022. Latest assessment published 1 April 2026; the Care Quality Commission's newer assessments are published on its website rather than as reports.

The rating is the Care Quality Commission's. We show it as published and do not change it.

Who runs it

Ownership type
Organisation
Companies House number
11014768 (opens Companies House)

Getting help from Worcestershire County Council

The council can assess what care someone needs and tell them what help with the cost they may get.

Checked on the council's website, November 2026.

Common questions

Does Medistaff24 provide nursing care?
The Care Quality Commission's register does not list nursing care for Medistaff24.
When was Medistaff24 last inspected?
The Care Quality Commission's latest rating for Medistaff24 was published on 1 April 2026.
Who runs Medistaff24?
Medistaff24 is run by Medistaff24 Ltd.
What is Medistaff24's CQC rating?
Its overall rating from the Care Quality Commission is Good, published on 1 April 2026.