Rated Care Homes

Dove Home Care Agency Limited

RI

Requires improvement

Rated on

Rating from the Care Quality Commission.

At a glance

  • 4 ratings

    Its last inspection moved it down from Good to Requires improvement.

  • 3 months

    since the latest rating was published.

  • 5 of 40

    rated home care services in Solihull are rated Requires improvement, like this one.

Dove Home Care Agency Limited: inspection record

Home care, Solihull

Rated Requires improvement in July 2026, down from Good.

Dove Home Care Agency Limited: inspection record: inspection ratings by year, 2015 to 2026
201520162017201820192020202120222023202420252026
Overall
Safe
Effective
Caring
Responsive
Well-led

Ratings published by the Care Quality Commission.

Compare nearby

Nearest rated Good or Outstanding: Homecare For You Solihull (Good, 0.3 miles away) and Care Services (Good, 0.5 miles away).

Nearest home care services:

  1. RI
    Meadow Home Care Services Ltd Requires improvement, 0.2 miles away
  2. G
    Homecare For You Solihull Good, 0.3 miles away
  3. G
    Care Services Good, 0.5 miles away
  4. G
  5. –
    Supreme Care 365 Ltd Not yet rated, 0.7 miles away

See all home care services in Solihull

See all home care services in Olton

What inspectors found

From the Care Quality Commission's assessment published 13 July 2026 (assessment visit 14 April 2026). Quoted under the Open Government Licence.

Date of Assessment: 27 April to 19 May 2026. The service is a homecare service providing support to older people living with dementia, physical disabilities, sensory impairments and learning disabilities. Whilst homecare visits were provided locally to the service, the service also provided a national live-in care service. Live-in care is when a carer lives in a person’s home to provide ongoing support with their day-to-day needs. At the time of the inspection, the service was supporting a total of 245 individuals who were receiving the regulated activity: personal care.

  • Safe No rating
  • Effective No rating
  • Caring Good
  • Responsive No rating
  • Well-led No rating
Read the rest of CQC's summary

The Inspection was a responsive assessment due to concerns received about the service,

We have assessed the service against ‘Right support, right care, right culture’ guidance to make judgements about whether the provider guaranteed people with a learning disability and autistic people respect, equality, dignity, choices, independence and good access to local communities that most people take for granted.

Overall, systems and processes were not always robust which meant people were not always fully protected from risk. Governance arrangements were not consistently effective in identifying and addressing concerns, including gaps in call monitoring oversight, staff training, recruitment processes, and delays in reviewing medicines.

Risk assessments were not always in place or aligned with care delivery, and care planning documentation was not consistently up to date or reflective of changes in people’s needs. This limited staff guidance created risks around areas such as fire safety, safeguarding reporting, and medicines management. Systems for consent and decision-making were not always clearly evidenced, and care was not always consistently person-centred, with limited detail around people’s preferences, equality needs, and future wishes.

However, people reported they felt safe and well supported, and staff demonstrated a good understanding of safeguarding, consent, and infection prevention. Feedback about care was consistently positive, with people describing staff as kind, respectful and supportive of their independence. Staff worked collaboratively with external professionals and made referrals where needed to improve outcomes. There was a positive and caring culture, with most staff feeling supported by approachable managers and able to raise concerns.

The provider was open to feedback and had begun taking action to address issues identified, demonstrating a willingness to improve.

The provider was in breach of 4 legal regulations relative to person-centred care, need for consent, safe care and treatment, and governance and oversight. In instances where CQC has begun a process of regulatory action, we may publish this information on our website after any representations and/or appeals have been concluded, if the action has been taken forward.

  1. Safe

    No rating

    Safe – this means we looked for evidence that people were protected from abuse and avoidable harm. At our last assessment we rated this key question good. At this assessment the rating has changed to requires improvement.

    This meant some aspects of the service were not always safe and there was limited assurance about safety. There was an increased risk that people could be harmed.

    The service was in breach of legal regulation in relation to people’s safe care and treatment.

  2. Effective

    No rating

    Effective – this means we looked for evidence that people’s care, treatment and support achieved good outcomes and promoted a good quality of life, based on best available evidence.

    At our last assessment we rated this key question good. At this assessment the rating has changed to requires improvement.

    This meant the effectiveness of people’s care, treatment and support did not always achieve good outcomes or was inconsistent.

    The service was in breach of legal regulation in relation to the need for consent.

  3. Caring

    Good

    Caring – this means we looked for evidence that the provider involved people and treated them with compassion, kindness, dignity and respect.

    At our last assessment we rated this key question good. At this assessment the rating has remained good. This meant people were supported, treated as individuals and privacy and dignity was respected.

  4. Responsive

    No rating

    Responsive – this means we looked for evidence that the provider met people’s needs.

    At our last assessment we rated this key question good. At this assessment the rating has changed to requires improvement.

    This meant people’s needs were not always met.

    The service was in breach of legal regulation in relation to person-centred care.

  5. Well-led

    No rating

    Well-led – this means we looked for evidence that service leadership, management and governance assured high-quality, person-centred care; supported learning and innovation; and promoted an open, fair culture.

    At our last assessment we rated this key question good. At this assessment the rating has changed to requires improvement.

    This meant the management and leadership was inconsistent. Leaders and the culture they created did not always support the delivery of high-quality, person-centred care.

    The service was in breach of legal regulation in relation to governance at the service.

Questions to ask the service

  1. Safe was rated Requires improvement on 13 July 2026. Ask how medicines are managed, how staffing levels are decided and how incidents are reviewed.
  2. Effective was rated Requires improvement on 13 July 2026. Ask about staff training and how health appointments are arranged.
  3. Responsive was rated Requires improvement on 13 July 2026. Ask to see how care plans are kept up to date, how complaints are handled.
  4. Well-led was rated Requires improvement on 13 July 2026. Ask about changes in management and what has changed since the report.

Registration details

Registered manager
John Oughton
Registered with the CQC since
What it provides
Domiciliary care service
Who it supports
Dementia, Learning disabilities or autistic spectrum disorder, Older People, Physical Disability, Sensory Impairment

Inspection report

Read the full inspection report (opens the Care Quality Commission website)

5 inspection reports, latest 3 January 2020. Latest assessment published 13 July 2026; the Care Quality Commission's newer assessments are published on its website rather than as reports.

The rating is the Care Quality Commission's. We show it as published and do not change it.

Who runs it

Ownership type
Organisation
Companies House number
05525732 (opens Companies House)

Getting help from Solihull Metropolitan Borough Council

The council can assess what care someone needs and tell them what help with the cost they may get.

Checked on the council's website, November 2026.

Common questions

Does Dove Home Care Agency Limited provide nursing care?
The Care Quality Commission's register does not list nursing care for Dove Home Care Agency Limited.
When was Dove Home Care Agency Limited last inspected?
The Care Quality Commission's latest rating for Dove Home Care Agency Limited was published on 13 July 2026.
Who runs Dove Home Care Agency Limited?
Dove Home Care Agency Limited is run by Dove Home Care Agency Limited.
What is Dove Home Care Agency Limited's CQC rating?
Its overall rating from the Care Quality Commission is Requires improvement, published on 13 July 2026.

Contact

Phone
01675 442226
Address
Unit 4, Olton Bridge, 245 Warwick Road, Solihull, B92 7AH Map (opens Google Maps)
Read the full inspection report (opens the Care Quality Commission website)

Compare nearby

Nearest rated Good or Outstanding: Homecare For You Solihull (Good, 0.3 miles away) and Care Services (Good, 0.5 miles away).

Nearest home care services:

  1. RI
    Meadow Home Care Services Ltd Requires improvement, 0.2 miles away
  2. G
    Homecare For You Solihull Good, 0.3 miles away
  3. G
    Care Services Good, 0.5 miles away
  4. G
  5. –
    Supreme Care 365 Ltd Not yet rated, 0.7 miles away

See all home care services in Solihull

See all home care services in Olton