Loving Care Domiciliary Services Limited
- Home care
- Dementia care
- Registered since 2011
- Caterham, Surrey, South East
Good
Rated on
Rating from the Care Quality Commission.
At a glance
3 ratings
Rated Good at every inspection since 2016.
4 months
since the latest rating was published.
177 of 209
rated home care services in Surrey are rated Good, like this one.
Loving Care Domiciliary Services Limited: inspection record
Rated Good in July 2026.
| 2015 | 2016 | 2017 | 2018 | 2019 | 2020 | 2021 | 2022 | 2023 | 2024 | 2025 | 2026 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Overall | ||||||||||||
| Safe | ||||||||||||
| Effective | ||||||||||||
| Caring | ||||||||||||
| Responsive | ||||||||||||
| Well-led |
Ratings published by the Care Quality Commission.
Compare nearby
- G Excellent Care Ltd Good, 0.2 miles away
- G Gold Care Services Ltd Good, 0.4 miles away
- – Radfield Home Care Caterham, Oxted & Edenbridge Not yet rated, 0.5 miles away
- G SAI Infinity Care Good, 0.5 miles away
- G Westbrook Care Ltd Good, 0.5 miles away
What inspectors found
From the Care Quality Commission's assessment published 1 July 2026 (assessment visit 19 June 2026). Quoted under the Open Government Licence.
Loving Care Domiciliary Services Limited is a domiciliary care agency. The service is registered to support younger and older adults, those with physical disabilities, people living with dementia and people with sensory impairments.
- Safe Good
- Effective Good
- Caring Good
- Responsive Good
- Well-led Good
Read the rest of CQC's summary
At the time of the assessment, 13 people were receiving the regulated activity of personal care.
We carried out this assessment on 22 June 2026.
This service was previously rated as good. We carried out this assessment to confirm whether the rating of good remains accurate. This report does not provide detailed information on areas where we found practice continues to meet a good standard. Instead, our findings focus on any areas where the service needs to improve or where we found exceptional practice.
Risks were identified, assessed and managed, and staff understood the risks associated with people’s care. One member of staff told us, “Everything is on the care plan including the risk assessments. It has everything we need to know about risks, including around mobility and choking.” Staff were aware of their responsibilities in safeguarding people from abuse and neglect. One member of staff told us, “I would be looking out to see if someone was bruised, injured, distressed or generally anxious. I would inform the on call [manager]. I also have the contact details of the [safeguarding] team in my handbook.”
Incidents and concerns were reported and reviewed, and learning was used to improve practice. The registered manager told us, “We have incident and accident forms here, if anything has happened the carer will come to the office and fill out a report. If it was an incident for a service user at their home and involved a health and safety risk, I would go out and visit again and then put whatever needed to be done in place and update the care plan.”
Rotas were planned carefully to ensure staff had sufficient travel time in between care calls. One member of staff told us, “For the amount [of people] we have, there is enough staff to cover. We are given travel time between calls. If a call takes longer, I will tell the office.” Staff were provided with an effective induction and ongoing training and supervisions took place.
Assessments were completed before care started and reviewed when people’s needs changed. Staff worked with health and social care professionals where needed, supporting good outcomes and continuity of care. One member of staff told us, “We monitor how much someone has drunk and we encourage them to drink whilst we are there. The next carer can then see how much they have drunk. We encourage eating and give them what they want to eat.”
Staff understood the importance of maintaining dignity and privacy when supporting people in their own homes. People were treated as individuals, and care plans reflected people’s preferred routines, preferences and life history. One member of staff told us, “They [leaders] always tell us to treat people like they are your mum. I chat, I ask them questions, talk about their day and life. We chat a lot.”
Leaders listened to feedback and responded appropriately to concerns. There was also a robust complaints system in place. Care delivery was well organised and accessible, supporting reliable and consistent care visits. The registered manager told us, “When we do a care review we will go through the current care plan with people and make any changes.”
Leaders and staff understood the barriers people may face and actively worked to address them. One member of staff told us, “You don’t want people to feel different, [we need to ensure we are ] giving everyone the same opportunities.”
The service was well-led. Leaders promoted a clear direction focused on person‑centred care and continuous improvement. Governance systems provided oversight of quality, risk and performance. Leaders were approachable, and staff felt supported to raise concerns, contribute to learning and deliver safe, high‑quality care in people’s homes. One member of staff told us, “I do feel it’s well managed. Its open and friendly, I can come here [office] and talk about anything I like. It’s always supportive.”
Staff understood the value and ethos of the service with 1 member of staff telling us, “I am there for people, support their independence, make them feel valued and help them get through their life in a meaningful way. It’s a very lovely job.”
-
Safe
Good
Safe – this means we looked for evidence that people were protected from abuse and avoidable harm. At our last assessment we rated this key question as good. At this assessment the rating has remained as good. This meant people were safe and protected from avoidable harm.
-
Effective
Good
Effective – this means we looked for evidence that people’s care, treatment and support achieved good outcomes and promoted a good quality of life, based on best available evidence. At our last assessment we rated this key question as good. At this assessment the rating has remained as good. This meant people’s outcomes were consistently good, and people’s feedback confirmed this.
-
Caring
Good
Caring – this means we looked for evidence that the provider involved people and treated them with compassion, kindness, dignity and respect. At our last assessment we rated this key question as good. At this assessment the rating has remained a good. This meant people were supported and treated with dignity and respect and involved as partners in their care.
-
Responsive
Good
Responsive – this means we looked for evidence that the provider met people’s needs. At our last assessment we rated this key question as good. At this assessment the rating has remained as good. This meant people’s needs were met through good organisation and delivery.
-
Well-led
Good
Well-led – this means we looked for evidence that service leadership, management and governance assured high-quality, person-centred care; supported learning and innovation; and promoted an open, fair culture. At our last assessment we rated this key question as good. At this assessment the rating has remained as good. This meant the service was consistently managed and well-led. Leaders and the culture they created promoted high-quality, person-centred care.
Questions to ask the service
- Ask to see the most recent Care Quality Commission (CQC) report and what the service did about any points in it.
- Ask how visit times are agreed and who covers when your usual carer is away.
Registration details
- Registered manager
- Sandra Jenner
- Registered with the CQC since
- What it provides
- Domiciliary care service
- Who it supports
- Dementia, Older People, Physical Disability, Sensory Impairment, Younger Adults
Inspection report
Read the full inspection report (opens the Care Quality Commission website)5 inspection reports, latest 14 December 2019. Latest assessment published 1 July 2026; the Care Quality Commission's newer assessments are published on its website rather than as reports.
The rating is the Care Quality Commission's. We show it as published and do not change it.
Who runs it
- Ownership type
- Organisation
- Companies House number
- 07041747 (opens Companies House)
Getting help from Surrey County Council
The council can assess what care someone needs and tell them what help with the cost they may get.
- Adult social care at Surrey County Council
- Ask for a care needs assessment
- Phone: 0300 200 1005, Monday to Friday, 9am to 5pm
- Contact adult social care online
- Support for carers
- Paying for care: Surrey County Council
Checked on the council's website, November 2026.
Common questions
- Does Loving Care Domiciliary Services Limited provide nursing care?
- The Care Quality Commission's register does not list nursing care for Loving Care Domiciliary Services Limited.
- When was Loving Care Domiciliary Services Limited last inspected?
- The Care Quality Commission's latest rating for Loving Care Domiciliary Services Limited was published on 1 July 2026.
- Who runs Loving Care Domiciliary Services Limited?
- Loving Care Domiciliary Services Limited is run by Loving Care Domiciliary Services Limited.
- What is Loving Care Domiciliary Services Limited's CQC rating?
- Its overall rating from the Care Quality Commission is Good, published on 1 July 2026.
Contact
- Phone
- 01883 330687
- Address
- 97 Chaldon Road, Caterham, CR3 5PJ Map (opens Google Maps)
Compare nearby
- G Excellent Care Ltd Good, 0.2 miles away
- G Gold Care Services Ltd Good, 0.4 miles away
- – Radfield Home Care Caterham, Oxted & Edenbridge Not yet rated, 0.5 miles away
- G SAI Infinity Care Good, 0.5 miles away
- G Westbrook Care Ltd Good, 0.5 miles away