Rated Care Homes

Partners in Care (Nottingham) Limited

G

Good

Rated on

Rating from the Care Quality Commission.

At a glance

  • 1 rating

    Only one rating on record, so there is no trend to show yet.

  • 6 months

    since the latest rating was published.

  • 86 of 114

    rated home care services in Nottinghamshire are rated Good, like this one.

Partners in Care (Nottingham) Limited: inspection record

Home care, Nottinghamshire

Rated Good in April 2026.

Partners in Care (Nottingham) Limited: inspection record: inspection ratings by year, 2015 to 2026
201520162017201820192020202120222023202420252026
Overall
Safe
Effective
Caring
Responsive
Well-led

Ratings published by the Care Quality Commission.

Compare nearby

  1. –
    Phillimon Care Not yet rated, less than 0.1 miles away
  2. G
    Agincare Live-in Care (Central) Good, 0.3 miles away
  3. G
    Agincare UK Notts County Good, 0.3 miles away
  4. O
    Respectful Care Outstanding, 0.3 miles away
  5. G
    Helping Hands Arnold Good, 0.4 miles away

See all home care services in Nottinghamshire

See all home care services in Arnold

What inspectors found

From the Care Quality Commission's assessment published 13 April 2026 (assessment visit 5 March 2026). Quoted under the Open Government Licence.

Date of assessment was 9 March 2026 to 12 March 2026. Partners in Care (Nottingham) Limited is a homecare service providing care and support to adults of all ages, people who are living with dementia, mental health conditions, substance misuse problems, physical disabilities or sensory impairments living in their own home.

  • Safe Good
  • Effective Good
  • Caring Good
  • Responsive Good
  • Well-led Good
Read the rest of CQC's summary

At the time of our assessment 24 people were supported by the service with a regulated activity. Regulated activity is defined as help with care related to personal hygiene and eating. The provider had registered with us on 26 January 2022, and this is their first assessment. This was an offsite assessment; this meant we requested all records to be sent to us electronically and reviewed them offsite. We announced the assessment 72 hours before to ensure there would be someone available at the office to support the assessment and send all the requested information.

The registered manager was experienced, capable, and compassionate, who provided clear leadership and maintained a positive culture within the service. Effective governance systems were in place and provided robust and accurate oversight of the service. Quality assurance processes were established and helped maintain safe and consistent standards of care. There were enough staff to ensure people received their scheduled care visits, and staff remained for the full allocated time. Care plans were detailed and included clear written guidance to ensure staff could support people safely and effectively. Medicines were managed safely, and all incidents and accidents were appropriately reviewed to identify learning and reduce future risks. People were treated with kindness and respect, and both staff and the registered manager demonstrated a strong understanding of people’s needs and preferences. However, the Mental Capacity Act (2005) was not always applied consistently. Decision‑specific capacity assessments were not routinely completed for people identified as potentially lacking capacity, which meant some decisions were not fully aligned with legal requirements.

  1. Safe

    Good

    Safe – this means we looked for evidence that people were protected from abuse and avoidable harm.

    This is the first assessment for this newly registered service. This key question has been rated Good. This meant people were safe and protected from avoidable harm.

  2. Effective

    Good

    Effective – this means we looked for evidence that people’s care, treatment and support achieved good outcomes and promoted a good quality of life, based on best available evidence.

    This is the first assessment for this newly registered service. This key question has been rated Good. This meant people’s outcomes were consistently good, and people’s feedback confirmed this.

  3. Caring

    Good

    Caring – this means we looked for evidence that the provider involved people and treated them with compassion, kindness, dignity and respect.

    This is the first assessment for this newly registered service. This key question has been rated Good. This meant people were supported and treated with dignity and respect; and involved as partners in their care.

  4. Responsive

    Good

    Responsive – this means we looked for evidence that the provider met people’s needs.

    This is the first assessment for this newly registered service. This key question has been rated Good. This meant people’s needs were met through good organisation and delivery.

  5. Well-led

    Good

    Well-led – this means we looked for evidence that service leadership, management and governance assured high-quality, person-centred care; supported learning and innovation; and promoted an open, fair culture.

    This is the first assessment for this newly registered service. This key question has been rated Good. This meant the service was consistently managed and well-led. Leaders and the culture they created promoted high-quality, person-centred care.

Questions to ask the service

  1. Ask to see the most recent Care Quality Commission (CQC) report and what the service did about any points in it.
  2. Ask how visit times are agreed and who covers when your usual carer is away.

Registration details

Registered manager
Katie Stephens
Registered with the CQC since
What it provides
Domiciliary care service
Who it supports
Dementia, Mental Health, Older People, People who misuse drugs and alcohol, Physical Disability, Sensory Impairment, Younger Adults

Inspection report

Read the full inspection report (opens the Care Quality Commission website)

The rating is the Care Quality Commission's. We show it as published and do not change it.

Who runs it

Ownership type
Organisation
Companies House number
13613004 (opens Companies House)

Getting help from Nottinghamshire County Council

The council can assess what care someone needs and tell them what help with the cost they may get.

Checked on the council's website, November 2026.

Common questions

Does Partners in Care (Nottingham) Limited provide nursing care?
The Care Quality Commission's register does not list nursing care for Partners in Care (Nottingham) Limited.
When was Partners in Care (Nottingham) Limited last inspected?
The Care Quality Commission's latest rating for Partners in Care (Nottingham) Limited was published on 13 April 2026.
Who runs Partners in Care (Nottingham) Limited?
Partners in Care (Nottingham) Limited is run by Partners in Care (Nottingham) Limited.
What is Partners in Care (Nottingham) Limited's CQC rating?
Its overall rating from the Care Quality Commission is Good, published on 13 April 2026.

Contact

Phone
07722 933555
Address
11 Chapel Lane, Arnold, Nottingham, NG5 7DR Map (opens Google Maps)
Read the full inspection report (opens the Care Quality Commission website)

Compare nearby

  1. –
    Phillimon Care Not yet rated, less than 0.1 miles away
  2. G
    Agincare Live-in Care (Central) Good, 0.3 miles away
  3. G
    Agincare UK Notts County Good, 0.3 miles away
  4. O
    Respectful Care Outstanding, 0.3 miles away
  5. G
    Helping Hands Arnold Good, 0.4 miles away

See all home care services in Nottinghamshire

See all home care services in Arnold