Rated Care Homes

MH Quality Care Ltd

–

No overall rating

No overall rating: this location offers more than one kind of service, so the CQC rates each service separately.

At a glance

  • 1 rating

    Only one rating on record, so there is no trend to show yet.

  • 19 months

    since the latest rating was published.

  • 77%

    of rated home care services in Birmingham are Good or Outstanding (82% across the West Midlands, 88% across England).

MH Quality Care Ltd: inspection record

Home care, Birmingham

This service has no overall rating at present. The squares show its earlier ratings.

MH Quality Care Ltd: inspection record: inspection ratings by year, 2015 to 2026
201520162017201820192020202120222023202420252026
Overall
Safe
Effective
Caring
Responsive
Well-led

Ratings published by the Care Quality Commission.

Compare nearby

Nearest rated Good or Outstanding: Four Oaks Healthcare limited (Good, 1.5 miles away) and Premium Community Care Ltd (Good, 1.6 miles away).

Nearest home care services:

  1. RI
    SCS - Head Office Requires improvement, 0.4 miles away
  2. –
    Inventive Care Services Ltd Not yet rated, 0.5 miles away
  3. RI
    Assisted Lives (Birmingham) Requires improvement, 1 mile away
  4. –
    Goldcrest Heathcare Service (Birmingham) No overall rating, 1 mile away
  5. –
    Clarity Homecare (Sutton Coldfield) Not yet rated, 1.5 miles away

See all home care services in Birmingham

What inspectors found

From the Care Quality Commission's assessment published 19 March 2025 (assessment visit 14 October 2024). Quoted under the Open Government Licence.

MH Quality Care Ltd is a domiciliary care service providing personal care to people living in their own homes. Not everyone who used the service received personal care. CQC only inspects where people receive a regulated activity of personal care. This is help with tasks related to personal hygiene and eating. Where they do, we also consider any wider social care provided.

  • Safe Good
  • Caring Good
  • Well-led Good
Read the rest of CQC's summary

The provider was able to demonstrate good levels of knowledge and processes regarding safeguarding procedures. The provider ensured that people with different communication needs had those needs met, and provided accessible information to ensure people were kept informed. People and where appropriate, relatives, told us they took part in care planning and reviews.

Staff were well trained and knew how to manage risks associated with people they supported. Staff were recruited safely and received the ongoing support needed from management to work safely and effectively. Although care plans were person centred, not all risk plans were thorough. However, care plans covered information that was not available in risk management plans.

The provider was able to demonstrate how they mitigated against the risk of discrimination within the service for both service users and staff.

  1. Safe

    Good

    Our rating for this key question is good. Robust safeguarding procedures were in place to protect people from abuse and neglect. Staff were able to tell us the processes to be followed in the event of any safeguarding incidents, accidents, complaints and concerns.

    Care plans were detailed and clear, highlighting individual risks to people. However, these risks were not documented on risk reviews and risk management forms. The information was part of the people’s care plans, which meant that staff would not have quick access to information and guidance on risks without having to search through the relevant care plan. The provider understood that this was not ideal, as staff would need quick access to this information on risks should a new situation emerge or should staff be less familiar with the person they were supporting. Staff knew people well and there were no instances where a lack of separate risk assessments placed people at risk. During the inspection, the provider completed new risk assessment documentation to use alongside information contained within the care plans for all people they supported. These were assessed as good quality and detailed.

    People and their relatives told us that staff were usually punctual and did not leave earlier than the allocated time for the call. Staff received ongoing training, supervision and support to ensure they had the knowledge and skills to work safely and effectively.

  2. Caring

    Good

    People were always treated with kindness, empathy and compassion. felt they mattered and that their experience of how they were treated and supported mattered. Their privacy and dignity was respected. Every effort was made to take their wishes into account and respect their choices, to achieve the best possible outcomes for them. This included supporting people to live as independently as possible

  3. Well-led

    Good

    Our rating for this key question is good. The provider had developed robust governance and quality assurance systems and processes, designed to enable them to monitor the quality and safety of people’s care on an ongoing basis and take steps to drive improvement and share learning across the staff team. Staff and management understood what was expected of them in their respective roles.

Questions to ask the service

  1. Ask to see the most recent Care Quality Commission (CQC) report and what the service did about any points in it.
  2. Ask how visit times are agreed and who covers when your usual carer is away.

Registration details

Registered manager
Hafsah Maleeha
Registered with the CQC since
What it provides
Domiciliary care service, Supported living service
Who it supports
Children 0-18 years, Dementia, Learning disabilities or autistic spectrum disorder, Mental Health, Older People, People with an eating disorder, Physical Disability, Sensory Impairment, Younger Adults

Inspection report

Read the full inspection report (opens the Care Quality Commission website)

The rating is the Care Quality Commission's. We show it as published and do not change it.

Who runs it

Ownership type
Organisation
Companies House number
13345766 (opens Companies House)

Getting help from Birmingham City Council

The council can assess what care someone needs and tell them what help with the cost they may get.

Checked on the council's website, November 2026.

Common questions

Does MH Quality Care Ltd provide nursing care?
The Care Quality Commission's register does not list nursing care for MH Quality Care Ltd.
When was MH Quality Care Ltd last inspected?
The Care Quality Commission's latest rating for MH Quality Care Ltd was published on 19 March 2025.
Who runs MH Quality Care Ltd?
MH Quality Care Ltd is run by MH Quality Care Ltd.
What is MH Quality Care Ltd's CQC rating?
No overall rating: this location offers more than one kind of service, so the CQC rates each service separately.

Contact

Address
8 Burney Lane, Birmingham, B8 2AH Map (opens Google Maps)
Read the full inspection report (opens the Care Quality Commission website)

Compare nearby

Nearest rated Good or Outstanding: Four Oaks Healthcare limited (Good, 1.5 miles away) and Premium Community Care Ltd (Good, 1.6 miles away).

Nearest home care services:

  1. RI
    SCS - Head Office Requires improvement, 0.4 miles away
  2. –
    Inventive Care Services Ltd Not yet rated, 0.5 miles away
  3. RI
    Assisted Lives (Birmingham) Requires improvement, 1 mile away
  4. –
    Goldcrest Heathcare Service (Birmingham) No overall rating, 1 mile away
  5. –
    Clarity Homecare (Sutton Coldfield) Not yet rated, 1.5 miles away

See all home care services in Birmingham