Care Options
- Home care
- Dementia care
- Registered since 2011
- Caterham, Surrey, South East
Good
Rated on
Rating from the Care Quality Commission.
At a glance
3 ratings
Rated Good at every inspection since 2016.
2 months
since the latest rating was published.
177 of 209
rated home care services in Surrey are rated Good, like this one.
Care Options: inspection record
Rated Good in September 2026.
| 2015 | 2016 | 2017 | 2018 | 2019 | 2020 | 2021 | 2022 | 2023 | 2024 | 2025 | 2026 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Overall | ||||||||||||
| Safe | ||||||||||||
| Effective | ||||||||||||
| Caring | ||||||||||||
| Responsive | ||||||||||||
| Well-led |
Ratings published by the Care Quality Commission.
Compare nearby
- G Nightingale Holistic Services Good, less than 0.1 miles away
- – Top4Care Services Ltd No overall rating, 0.3 miles away
- G Gold Care Services Ltd Good, 0.4 miles away
- G Amazing Angels Homecare Good, 0.6 miles away
- G Excellent Care Ltd Good, 0.6 miles away
What inspectors found
From the Care Quality Commission's assessment published 1 September 2026 (assessment visit 25 July 2026). Quoted under the Open Government Licence.
Date of assessment: 28 July to 11 August 2026. Care Options is a domiciliary care agency providing the regulated activity personal care to people living in their own homes. The service supports adults over 65 years, people with dementia, mental health conditions, physical disabilities and sensory impairments. At the time of this assessment the service was supporting 16 people.
- Safe Good
- Effective Good
- Caring Good
- Responsive Good
- Well-led Good
Read the rest of CQC's summary
People’s needs were assessed prior to any packages of care being agreed and planned. The assessments were kept updated and helped leaders produce a care plan. Staff had access to information on people’s needs on an electronic care planning system.
If people needed help to access healthcare, staff contacted professionals and organised appointments. Systems were effective for staff to communicate with each other about people’s changing needs and any events or incidents. Staff understood the principles of the Mental Capacity Act 2005 and the importance of obtaining consent. People signed consent forms prior to any service starting.
Risks to people’s safety had been assessed and there was guidance for staff to know what care and support to provide. However, some risk management plans lacked details in some areas, particularly around health conditions such as diabetes. Leaders regularly contacted healthcare professionals when needed and staff knew early signs of general ill health.
Medicines were managed safely. People had medicines administration records which staff signed when administering medicines. Details of medicines support were recorded in people’s care records and staff had training on medicines management. Leaders had completed some observations of staff administering medicines, however, there were no details recorded of what was observed and whether staff were competent.
Staff were recruited safely and new staff had an induction when starting work. Refresher training was provided and staff said they could ask for any further training if needed. The provider had systems to support staff wellbeing and promote equality, diversity and inclusion amongst the workforce. Staff told us they felt well supported and enjoyed their work.
Governance systems were effective to help the provider assess quality and safety. People, relatives and staff were asked for their views on the service regularly. Unannounced quality checks were completed and leaders telephoned people to make sure they were happy with the service. There was a registered manager in post who was also the owner. Day to day management was being completed by an administrator and manager.
-
Safe
Good
Safe – this means we looked for evidence that people were protected from abuse and avoidable harm. At our last assessment we rated this key question requires improvement. At this assessment the rating has changed to good. This meant people were safe and protected from avoidable harm.
-
Effective
Good
Effective – this means we looked for evidence that people’s care, treatment and support achieved good outcomes and promoted a good quality of life, based on best available evidence.
At our last assessment we rated this key question good. At this assessment the rating has remained good. This meant people’s outcomes were consistently good, and people’s feedback confirmed this.
-
Caring
Good
Caring – this means we looked for evidence that the provider involved people and treated them with compassion, kindness, dignity and respect.
At our last assessment we rated this key question good. At this assessment the rating has remained good. This meant people were supported and treated with dignity and respect; and involved as partners in their care.
-
Responsive
Good
Responsive – this means we looked for evidence that the provider met people’s needs.
At our last assessment we rated this key question good. At this assessment the rating has remained good. This meant people’s needs were met through good organisation and delivery.
-
Well-led
Good
Well-led – this means we looked for evidence that service leadership, management and governance assured high-quality, person-centred care; supported learning and innovation; and promoted an open, fair culture.
At our last assessment we rated this key question good. At this assessment the rating has remained good. This meant the service was consistently managed and well-led. Leaders and the culture they created promoted high-quality, person-centred care.
Questions to ask the service
- Ask to see the most recent Care Quality Commission (CQC) report and what the service did about any points in it.
- Ask how visit times are agreed and who covers when your usual carer is away.
Registration details
- Registered manager
- Cherie Callender
- Registered with the CQC since
- What it provides
- Domiciliary care service
- Who it supports
- Dementia, Mental Health, Older People, People who misuse drugs and alcohol, People with an eating disorder, Physical Disability, Sensory Impairment
Inspection report
Read the full inspection report (opens the Care Quality Commission website)5 inspection reports, latest 18 December 2019. Latest assessment published 1 September 2026; the Care Quality Commission's newer assessments are published on its website rather than as reports.
The rating is the Care Quality Commission's. We show it as published and do not change it.
Who runs it
- Provider
- Caring Options Limited
- Ownership type
- Organisation
- Companies House number
- 04337330 (opens Companies House)
Getting help from Surrey County Council
The council can assess what care someone needs and tell them what help with the cost they may get.
- Adult social care at Surrey County Council
- Ask for a care needs assessment
- Phone: 0300 200 1005, Monday to Friday, 9am to 5pm
- Contact adult social care online
- Support for carers
- Paying for care: Surrey County Council
Checked on the council's website, November 2026.
Common questions
- Does Care Options provide nursing care?
- The Care Quality Commission's register does not list nursing care for Care Options.
- When was Care Options last inspected?
- The Care Quality Commission's latest rating for Care Options was published on 1 September 2026.
- Who runs Care Options?
- Care Options is run by Caring Options Limited.
- What is Care Options's CQC rating?
- Its overall rating from the Care Quality Commission is Good, published on 1 September 2026.
Contact
- Phone
- 01883 345344
- Address
- 75 Whyteleafe Road, Caterham, CR3 5EJ Map (opens Google Maps)
Compare nearby
- G Nightingale Holistic Services Good, less than 0.1 miles away
- – Top4Care Services Ltd No overall rating, 0.3 miles away
- G Gold Care Services Ltd Good, 0.4 miles away
- G Amazing Angels Homecare Good, 0.6 miles away
- G Excellent Care Ltd Good, 0.6 miles away