Rated Care Homes

Caring Companions

G

Good

Rated on

Rating from the Care Quality Commission.

At a glance

  • 3 ratings

    Its last inspection improved it from Requires improvement to Good.

  • 8 years

    since the latest rating was published. A rating this old may not show how the service is today.

  • 28 of 31

    rated home care services in St Helens are rated Good, like this one.

Caring Companions: inspection record

Home care, St Helens

Rated Good in February 2019, up from Requires improvement.

Caring Companions: inspection record: inspection ratings by year, 2015 to 2026
201520162017201820192020202120222023202420252026
Overall
Safe
Effective
Caring
Responsive
Well-led

Ratings published by the Care Quality Commission.

What inspectors found

From the Care Quality Commission's inspection report published 20 February 2019. Quoted under the Open Government Licence.

About the service: Caring Companions is a small domiciliary care service that provides support and personal care to older people in their owns homes within the St Helens area. At the time of our inspection the service was supporting three people with personal care.

Read the rest of CQC's summary

What life is like for people using this service: At the previous inspection the registered provider was in breach of regulation relating to governance. At that time they had no clear systems and processes in place to show that regular checks and reviews had taken place on records or staff observation. During this inspection, improvements had been made.

The registered manager had implemented new systems to record any checks that had been completed on people's care records, daily logs and medication administration records. They had also completed regular observations on staff competency to deliver effective person-centred care. Some staff observations had not been recorded, however staff confirmed that these were carried out on a regular basis. We made a recommendation in relation to this.

People told us they felt they received care in a safe way. Individual risks to people and the environment had been identified and assessed and measures put in place to manage them and minimise the risk of avoidable harm occurring. Staff showed a good understanding of their roles and responsibilities for keeping people safe from harm. Medicines were managed safely by trained staff who ensured that people received medicines at the right time.

Sufficient numbers of suitably qualified and skilled staff were deployed to meet people's individual needs. Staff had received a range of training and support to enable them to carry out their role safely. People told us they received the right care and support from staff who were well trained and competent at what they did.

Staff showed a genuine motivation to deliver care in a person-centred way based on people's preferences and likes. Staff treated people with kindness, compassion and respect and ensured that people's dignity was maintained at all times. People spoke positively about the care and support they received. People told us they received support from regular staff who knew them well. They told us staff always arrived on time and stayed the right amount of time.

People's needs and choices were assessed and planned for. Care plans identified intended outcomes for people and how they were to be met in a way they preferred. People received support to maintain good nutrition and hydration and their healthcare needs were understood and met.

Records relating to consent for care were accurately completed and people told us they were always offered choice and control over the care they received.

Care was delivered in a personalised way which was in line with information recorded in people's care plans. People and family members knew how to make a complaint and they were confident about complaining should they need to. They were confident that their complaint would be listened to and acted upon quickly.

The leadership of the service promoted person centred care and a positive culture within the staff team. People, family members and staff all described the registered manager as supportive and approachable. The registered manager showed a continued desire to improve on the service and displayed knowledge and understanding around the importance of working closely with other agencies and healthcare professionals where needed.

Questions to ask the service

  1. The last rating is 8 years old. Ask what has changed since then.
  2. Ask to see the most recent Care Quality Commission (CQC) report and what the service did about any points in it.
  3. Ask how visit times are agreed and who covers when your usual carer is away.

Registration details

Registered with the CQC since
What it provides
Domiciliary care service, Supported living service
Who it supports
Children 0-18 years, Dementia, Learning disabilities or autistic spectrum disorder, Mental Health, Older People, Physical Disability, Sensory Impairment, Whole Population

Inspection report

Read the full inspection report (opens the Care Quality Commission website)

5 inspection reports, latest 20 February 2019. The reports are on the Care Quality Commission website.

The rating is the Care Quality Commission's. We show it as published and do not change it.

Who runs it

Ownership type
Individual

Getting help from St Helens Borough Council

The council can assess what care someone needs and tell them what help with the cost they may get.

Checked on the council's website, November 2026.

Common questions

Does Caring Companions provide nursing care?
The Care Quality Commission's register does not list nursing care for Caring Companions.
When was Caring Companions last inspected?
The Care Quality Commission's latest rating for Caring Companions was published on 20 February 2019.
Who runs Caring Companions?
Caring Companions is run by Catherine Marr.
What is Caring Companions's CQC rating?
Its overall rating from the Care Quality Commission is Good, published on 20 February 2019.