Rated Care Homes

Eldercare

G

Good

Rated on

Rating from the Care Quality Commission.

At a glance

  • 3 ratings

    Its last inspection improved it from Requires improvement to Good.

  • 8 years

    since the latest rating was published. A rating this old may not show how the service is today.

  • 110 of 126

    rated home care services in North Yorkshire are rated Good, like this one.

Eldercare: inspection record

Home care, North Yorkshire

Rated Good in October 2018, up from Requires improvement.

Eldercare: inspection record: inspection ratings by year, 2015 to 2026
201520162017201820192020202120222023202420252026
Overall
Safe
Effective
Caring
Responsive
Well-led

Ratings published by the Care Quality Commission.

Compare nearby

  1. G
    Rydale Community Care Good, 0.1 miles away
  2. RI
    Mickle Hill Requires improvement, 0.2 miles away
  3. O
    The Wilf Ward Family Trust Complex Care North Outstanding, 0.5 miles away
  4. G
    Ryedale Special Families Good, 0.6 miles away
  5. G
    Your Ryedale Care Limited Good, 1.1 miles away

See all home care services in North Yorkshire

See all home care services in Pickering

What inspectors found

From the Care Quality Commission's inspection report published 20 October 2018. Quoted under the Open Government Licence.

The inspection started on 13 August 2018 and ended on 4 September 2018.The inspection was given two days notice of our inspection.

Read the rest of CQC's summary

At our last inspection the provider was found to be in breach of Regulation 17 Good governance. Following the last inspection, we asked the provider to complete an action plan to show what they would do and by when to improve the key questions of: Is the service Safe? Is the service Effective? and Is the service Well-led? to at least good.

At this inspection we found that sufficient improvement had been made to show that the provider was no longer in breach of regulation.

Eldercare is a domiciliary care agency. It provides personal care to people living in their own houses and flats in the community. It provides a service to older adults, some of whom may be living with dementia. At the time of inspection 86 older people used the service. One of the directors, who was also the registered manager, was present throughout the inspection.

There was a manager in post who had registered with CQC. A registered manager is a person who has registered with the Care Quality Commission to manage the service. Like registered providers, they are 'registered persons'. Registered persons have legal responsibility for meeting the requirements in the Health and Social Care Act 2008 and associated Regulations about how the service is run.'

Since the last inspection, quality assurance processes had been introduced to monitor and improve the service. These had checks been conducted on a regular basis but had not always been effective in identifying when documentation had not been returned to the office for monitoring. We have made a recommendation about this.

Safe recruitment processes continued to be followed although references did not always record dates to evidence when they had been received. The registered manager took action to correct this during the inspection.

Risk assessments were in place where required. There was a safeguarding policy and procedure in place and staff had been provided with safeguarding training. The management team were fully aware of the process to follow if any concerns were raised.

There were enough staff available to meet people's needs and attend planned care visits. People were supported by a consistent team of staff and pre-admission assessments had been completed to ensure the service could meet people's needs before a package of care was accepted.

Since the last inspection staff had been provided with additional training to ensure they had the skills and

knowledge to carry out their roles. A training plan was in place to ensure all training was delivered and refreshed within required timescales. Supervisions had begun to take place although this was not yet in line with the frequency outlined in the provider's supervision policy.

Improvements had been made to the management of medicines. Medicines had been administered and recorded appropriately. An auditing system was now in place to highlight and respond to any shortfalls.

People were supported to have maximum choice and control of their lives and staff supported them in the least restrictive way possible; the policies and systems in the service supported this practice. People had signed their care plans to consent to the support they were receiving.

People were encouraged to remain as independent as possible and their choices were respected by staff. Support with meals was provided where required.

Care was delivered in accordance with people's wishes and needs and care plans contained person-centred information. Relatives told us they were kept informed if any changes occurred.

People knew how to make a complaint and were confident any issues would be promptly addressed. The provider had a complaints policy and procedure in place and this was included in the service user guide.

The registered manager requested feedback from people who used the service and relatives. The results of these surveys had been analysed and action taken when shortfalls were identified. People, relatives and staff spoke positively about the management team and their approach.

Regular staff and management meetings took place to ensure all employees were kept up to date with changes and developments within the service.

The five questions we ask about services and what we found

Questions to ask the service

  1. Well-led was rated Requires improvement on 20 October 2018. Ask about changes in management and what has changed since the report.
  2. The last rating is 8 years old. Ask what has changed since then.
  3. Ask to see the most recent Care Quality Commission (CQC) report and what the service did about any points in it.

Registration details

Registered manager
Michael Hollins
Registered with the CQC since
What it provides
Domiciliary care service
Who it supports
Dementia, Older People, Physical Disability, Sensory Impairment, Younger Adults

Inspection report

Read the full inspection report (opens the Care Quality Commission website)

5 inspection reports, latest 20 October 2018. The reports are on the Care Quality Commission website.

The rating is the Care Quality Commission's. We show it as published and do not change it.

Who runs it

Ownership type
Organisation
Companies House number
04518068 (opens Companies House)

Summerhouse Limited runs 2 services, all in Yorkshire and the Humber. 2 are rated Good or Outstanding.

Other services run by Summerhouse Limited

  1. G
    Eldercare Good. Home care, North Yorkshire

Getting help from North Yorkshire Council

The council can assess what care someone needs and tell them what help with the cost they may get.

Checked on the council's website, November 2026.

Common questions

Does Eldercare provide nursing care?
The Care Quality Commission's register does not list nursing care for Eldercare.
When was Eldercare last inspected?
The Care Quality Commission's latest rating for Eldercare was published on 20 October 2018.
Who runs Eldercare?
Eldercare is run by Summerhouse Limited. It runs 2 services, all in Yorkshire and the Humber.
What is Eldercare's CQC rating?
Its overall rating from the Care Quality Commission is Good, published on 20 October 2018.

Contact

Phone
01751 475128
Address
Pickering House, Eastgate Square, Pickering, YO18 7DP Map (opens Google Maps)
Read the full inspection report (opens the Care Quality Commission website)

Compare nearby

  1. G
    Rydale Community Care Good, 0.1 miles away
  2. RI
    Mickle Hill Requires improvement, 0.2 miles away
  3. O
    The Wilf Ward Family Trust Complex Care North Outstanding, 0.5 miles away
  4. G
    Ryedale Special Families Good, 0.6 miles away
  5. G
    Your Ryedale Care Limited Good, 1.1 miles away

See all home care services in North Yorkshire

See all home care services in Pickering