Rated Care Homes

Care Pilot Limited

–

No overall rating

No overall rating: this location offers more than one kind of service, so the CQC rates each service separately.

At a glance

  • No rating

    No ratings have been published for this service yet.

  • 89%

    of rated home care services in Nottinghamshire are Good or Outstanding (85% across the East Midlands, 88% across England).

Care Pilot Limited: inspection record

Home care, Nottinghamshire

The squares stay empty until the Care Quality Commission publishes a rating.

Care Pilot Limited: inspection record: inspection ratings by year, 2015 to 2026
201520162017201820192020202120222023202420252026
Overall
Safe
Effective
Caring
Responsive
Well-led

Ratings published by the Care Quality Commission.

Compare nearby

Nearest rated Good or Outstanding: Fosse Healthcare - Armstrong Gardens (Good, 1.5 miles away) and Clarity Homecare Direct (Good, 4.1 miles away).

Nearest home care services:

  1. G
  2. G
    Clarity Homecare Direct Good, 4.1 miles away
  3. –
    Moorfield Court Not yet rated, 4.1 miles away
  4. –
    Bluebird Care (Mansfield and Ashfield) Not yet rated, 5.1 miles away
  5. G
    Exemplar Homecare Limited Good, 5.1 miles away

See all home care services in Nottinghamshire

What inspectors found

From the Care Quality Commission's assessment published 14 May 2025 (assessment visit 18 February 2025). Quoted under the Open Government Licence.

Date of Assessment: 25 February to 10 March 2025. Care Pilot Limited is a home care service providing support to older people/younger adults, people living with dementia and people with physical disabilities, autistic people and people living with a learning disability. The provider had a good learning culture and people could raise concerns. Managers investigated incidents thoroughly. People were protected and kept safe. Staff understood and managed risks. There were enough staff with the right skills, qualifications and experience. Managers made sure staff received training and regular supervision to maintain good-quality care. Staff managed medicines well.People and those important to them were involved in assessments of their needs. Staff carried out assessments taking account of people’s communication, spiritual, preferences and personal and health needs. Staff worked with all agencies involved in people’s care for the best outcomes and smooth transitions for example if admitted to hospital. They monitored people’s health to support healthy living. Staff made sure people understood their care and treatment to enable them to give informed consent. Staff understood the principles of the Mental Capacity Act and involved those important to people regarding decisions in people’s best interests where they did not have capacity.People were treated with kindness and compassion. Staff protected their privacy and dignity.They treated them as individuals and supported their preferences. People had choice in their care and staff responded to people in a timely way. The provider supported staff wellbeing. People were involved in decisions about their care. People knew how to give feedback and were confident the provider took it seriously and acted on it. People received fair and equal care and treatment.Leaders were visible, knowledgeable and supportive, helping staff develop in their roles. Staff felt supported to give feedback and were treated equally, free from bullying or harassment. People with protected characteristics felt supported. Staff understood their roles and responsibilities. The registered manager was open to new ideas and there was a culture of learning and continuous improvement. We assessed the service against ‘Right support, right care, right culture’ guidance to make judgements about whether the provider guaranteed people with a learning disability and autistic people respect, equality, dignity, choices, independence and good access to local communities that most people take for granted.

  • Safe No rating
  • Effective No rating
  • Caring No rating
  • Responsive No rating
  • Well-led No rating
Read the rest of CQC's summary
  1. Safe

    No rating

    Safe – this means we looked for evidence that people were protected from abuse and avoidable harm. This is the first assessment for this service. This key question has been rated good. This meant people were safe and protected from avoidable harm.

  2. Effective

    No rating

    Effective – this means we looked for evidence that people’s care, treatment and support achieved good outcomes and promoted a good quality of life, based on best available evidence.This is the first assessment for this service. This key question has been rated good.This meant people’s outcomes were consistently good, and people’s feedback confirmed this.

  3. Caring

    No rating

    Caring – this means we looked for evidence that the provider involved people and treated them with compassion, kindness, dignity and respect. This is the first assessment for this service. This key question has been rated good. This meant people were supported and treated with dignity and respect; and involved as partners in their care.

  4. Responsive

    No rating

    Responsive – this means we looked for evidence that the provider met people’s needs.This is the first assessment for this service. This key question has been rated good. This meant people’s needs were met through good organisation and delivery.

  5. Well-led

    No rating

    Well-led – this means we looked for evidence that service leadership, management and governance assured high-quality, person-centred care; supported learning and innovation; and promoted an open, fair culture.This is the first assessment for this service. This key question has been rated good.This meant the service was consistently managed and well-led. Leaders and the culture they created promoted high-quality, person-centred care.

Questions to ask the service

  1. Ask to see the most recent Care Quality Commission (CQC) report and what the service did about any points in it.
  2. Ask how visit times are agreed and who covers when your usual carer is away.

Registration details

Registered manager
Gertrude Mupambo
Registered with the CQC since
What it provides
Domiciliary care service, Supported living service
Who it supports
Children 0-18 years, Dementia, Learning disabilities or autistic spectrum disorder, Older People, Physical Disability, Younger Adults

Inspection report

Read the full inspection report (opens the Care Quality Commission website)

The rating is the Care Quality Commission's. We show it as published and do not change it.

Who runs it

Ownership type
Organisation
Companies House number
11430061 (opens Companies House)

Getting help from Nottinghamshire County Council

The council can assess what care someone needs and tell them what help with the cost they may get.

Checked on the council's website, November 2026.

Common questions

Does Care Pilot Limited provide nursing care?
The Care Quality Commission's register does not list nursing care for Care Pilot Limited.
When was Care Pilot Limited last inspected?
The Care Quality Commission's latest rating for Care Pilot Limited was published on 14 May 2025.
Who runs Care Pilot Limited?
Care Pilot Limited is run by Care Pilot Limited.
What is Care Pilot Limited's CQC rating?
No overall rating: this location offers more than one kind of service, so the CQC rates each service separately.

Contact

Phone
07477 674565
Address
Hexgreave Hall Estate, Farnsfield, Newark, NG22 8LS Map (opens Google Maps)
Read the full inspection report (opens the Care Quality Commission website)

Compare nearby

Nearest rated Good or Outstanding: Fosse Healthcare - Armstrong Gardens (Good, 1.5 miles away) and Clarity Homecare Direct (Good, 4.1 miles away).

Nearest home care services:

  1. G
  2. G
    Clarity Homecare Direct Good, 4.1 miles away
  3. –
    Moorfield Court Not yet rated, 4.1 miles away
  4. –
    Bluebird Care (Mansfield and Ashfield) Not yet rated, 5.1 miles away
  5. G
    Exemplar Homecare Limited Good, 5.1 miles away

See all home care services in Nottinghamshire