Rated Care Homes

Caremark Doncaster, Bassetlaw and West Lindsey

G

Good

Rated on

Rating from the Care Quality Commission.

At a glance

  • 1 rating

    Only one rating on record, so there is no trend to show yet.

  • 16 months

    since the latest rating was published.

  • 39 of 45

    rated home care services in Doncaster are rated Good, like this one.

Caremark Doncaster, Bassetlaw and West Lindsey: inspection record

Home care, Doncaster

Rated Good in June 2025.

Caremark Doncaster, Bassetlaw and West Lindsey: inspection record: inspection ratings by year, 2015 to 2026
201520162017201820192020202120222023202420252026
Overall
Safe
Effective
Caring
Responsive
Well-led

Ratings published by the Care Quality Commission.

Compare nearby

  1. G
    Clemence Rogers Home Care Good, 0.5 miles away
  2. O
    STEPS Outstanding, 2.8 miles away
  3. G
    Great Care Support Limited Good, 4.1 miles away
  4. G
    Housing 21 - Charles Court Good, 4.2 miles away
  5. –
    Fig Tree Blossom LTD Not yet rated, 4.2 miles away

See all home care services in Doncaster

What inspectors found

From the Care Quality Commission's assessment published 27 June 2025 (assessment visit 1 June 2025). Quoted under the Open Government Licence.

Date of assessment: 2 June to 18 June 2025. Caremark Doncaster, Bassetlaw and West Lindsey is a care at home service providing personal care and support to adults of all ages some of whom were living with dementia, physical disabilities and sensory impairments. At the time of this assessment there were 30 people receiving care and support. This was the first assessment of the service and we reviewed all key questions and quality statements. The reason for this assessment was to provide a rating. The service has been rated good.

  • Safe Good
  • Effective Good
  • Caring Good
  • Responsive Good
  • Well-led Good
Read the rest of CQC's summary

The provider had a proactive and positive culture of safety, based on openness and honesty. Appropriate systems were in place to share information about people's care and support to ensure continuity of care. Staff concentrated on improving people’s lives while protecting their right to live in safety, free from bullying, harassment, abuse, discrimination, avoidable harm and neglect. The provider shared concerns quickly and appropriately. People’s care plans were detailed and explained how care should be provided safely. Staff were recruited safely and pre-employment checks were completed prior to new employees delivering care and support. Medication administration was managed safely. Staff received appropriate training and support, and regular audits of processes checked compliance and safety of administration of medicines.

People's care plans clearly identified their assessed needs and detailed how they wanted their care to be delivered. Regular care teams provided care and support for people, which ensured consistency. Staff worked effectively with local health and care professionals to ensure transitions were well coordinated and planned according to people’s preferences. The provider supported people to regain their independence and control of their own care and support needs. People's care needs and risks associated with care and support were reviewed regularly which ensured agreed outcomes were achieved. People were told about their rights around consent which were respected when person-centred care was delivered.

People were always treated with kindness, empathy and compassion and their privacy and dignity was respected. Staff were kind and caring and people were happy with the quality of care and support they received. People knew their rights and had choice and control over their own care, treatment and wellbeing and they were supported to develop and maintain their independence. The management team listened to people, families and staff about changes to people’s needs and preferences. The provider cared about and promoted the wellbeing of their staff and supported and enabled staff to always deliver person-centred care.

Care and support was personalised and person-centred. Carers knew people and provided care and support specific to them which met their individual needs. Referrals were made to community-based health and care services when there were changes in people’s needs. Members of staff involved people in decisions about their care and told them what had changed as a result. People received care and support at times they chose. The provider was flexible and accommodated changes to call times when required. People were supported to be as independent as possible and to have the support, care and treatment they needed to avoid hospital admissions. People and their families were involved in conversations and decisions about future care and support.

The provider had a shared vision, strategy and culture. Leaders had the skills, knowledge, experience and credibility to lead effectively. They did so with integrity, openness and honesty. The provider valued diversity in their workforce. They worked towards an inclusive and fair culture by improving equality and equity for people who worked for them. There were clear responsibilities, roles, systems of accountability and good governance in place. These were used these to manage and deliver good quality, sustainable care and support for people. There was a focus on continuous learning, innovation and improvement across the organisation and local system. The provider encouraged creative ways of delivering equality of experience, outcome and quality of life for people.

  1. Safe

    Good

    Safe – this means we looked for evidence people were protected from abuse and avoidable harm. This is the first assessment for this newly registered service. This key question has been rated good. This meant people were safe and protected from avoidable harm.

  2. Effective

    Good

    Effective – this means we looked for evidence people’s care, treatment and support achieved good outcomes and promoted a good quality of life, based on best available evidence. This is the first assessment for this newly registered service. This key question has been rated Good. This meant people’s outcomes were consistently good, and people’s feedback confirmed this.

  3. Caring

    Good

    Caring – this means we looked for evidence the provider involved people and treated them with compassion, kindness, dignity and respect. This is the first assessment for this newly registered service. This key question has been rated Good. This meant people were supported and treated with dignity and respect; and involved as partners in their care.

  4. Responsive

    Good

    Responsive – this means we looked for evidence the provider met people’s needs. This is the first assessment for this newly registered service. This key question has been rated Good. This meant people’s needs were met through good organisation and delivery.

  5. Well-led

    Good

    Well-led – this means we looked for evidence service leadership, management and governance assured high-quality, person-centred care; supported learning and innovation; and promoted an open, fair culture. This is the first assessment for this newly registered service. This key question has been rated Good. This meant the service was consistently managed and well-led. Leaders and the culture they created promoted high-quality, person-centred care.

Questions to ask the service

  1. Ask to see the most recent Care Quality Commission (CQC) report and what the service did about any points in it.
  2. Ask how visit times are agreed and who covers when your usual carer is away.

Registration details

Registered manager
Alison Springall
Registered with the CQC since
What it provides
Domiciliary care service
Who it supports
Dementia, Mental Health, Older People, Physical Disability, Sensory Impairment, Younger Adults

Inspection report

Read the full inspection report (opens the Care Quality Commission website)

The rating is the Care Quality Commission's. We show it as published and do not change it.

Who runs it

Ownership type
Organisation
Companies House number
13749227 (opens Companies House)

Getting help from City of Doncaster Council

The council can assess what care someone needs and tell them what help with the cost they may get.

Checked on the council's website, November 2026.

Common questions

Does Caremark Doncaster, Bassetlaw and West Lindsey provide nursing care?
The Care Quality Commission's register does not list nursing care for Caremark Doncaster, Bassetlaw and West Lindsey.
When was Caremark Doncaster, Bassetlaw and West Lindsey last inspected?
The Care Quality Commission's latest rating for Caremark Doncaster, Bassetlaw and West Lindsey was published on 27 June 2025.
Who runs Caremark Doncaster, Bassetlaw and West Lindsey?
Caremark Doncaster, Bassetlaw and West Lindsey is run by Springboard Helpers Limited.
What is Caremark Doncaster, Bassetlaw and West Lindsey's CQC rating?
Its overall rating from the Care Quality Commission is Good, published on 27 June 2025.

Contact

Phone
01302 201392
Address
12 Sea King Drive, Fountain Court, Hayfield Lane, Auckley, Doncaster, DN9 3QR Map (opens Google Maps)
Read the full inspection report (opens the Care Quality Commission website)

Compare nearby

  1. G
    Clemence Rogers Home Care Good, 0.5 miles away
  2. O
    STEPS Outstanding, 2.8 miles away
  3. G
    Great Care Support Limited Good, 4.1 miles away
  4. G
    Housing 21 - Charles Court Good, 4.2 miles away
  5. –
    Fig Tree Blossom LTD Not yet rated, 4.2 miles away

See all home care services in Doncaster