Rated Care Homes

Endorphins Group

G

Good

Rated on

Rating from the Care Quality Commission.

At a glance

  • 1 rating

    Only one rating on record, so there is no trend to show yet.

  • 2 months

    since the latest rating was published.

  • 62 of 72

    rated home care services in Bradford are rated Good, like this one.

Endorphins Group: inspection record

Home care, Bradford

Rated Good in August 2026.

Endorphins Group: inspection record: inspection ratings by year, 2015 to 2026
201520162017201820192020202120222023202420252026
Overall
Safe
Effective
Caring
Responsive
Well-led

Ratings published by the Care Quality Commission.

Compare nearby

  1. RI
    Elmar Home Care Requires improvement, 0.4 miles away
  2. –
    Leeds Supported Living No overall rating, 0.7 miles away
  3. –
    New Horizons Community Care Limited Not yet rated, 1 mile away
  4. G
    Edenom Care Ltd Good, 1 mile away
  5. –
    Woodside Court Not yet rated, 1.1 miles away

See all home care services in Bradford

See all home care services in Low Moor

What inspectors found

From the Care Quality Commission's assessment published 18 August 2026 (assessment visit 2 June 2026). Quoted under the Open Government Licence.

Endorphins Group is a domiciliary care service providing personal care to people in their own homes. At the time of our assessment, there were 4 people receiving personal care. The assessment started on 15 June 2026 and concluded on 2 July 2026. This was the first assessment of this newly registered service.

  • Safe Good
  • Effective Good
  • Caring Good
  • Responsive Good
  • Well-led Good
Read the rest of CQC's summary

We assessed the provider against ‘Right support, right care, right culture’ guidance to make judgements about whether the provider guaranteed people with a learning disability and autistic people respect, equality, dignity, choices, independence and good access to local communities that most people take for granted. Our review of this service confirmed staff were caring, and supported people with learning disabilities to be involved in their care and treatment.

At the time of the inspection, the provider was providing personal care support to children. However, the provider was registered to support both children and adults and had systems and processes in place to meet the needs of people across both age groups.

Care planning was person-centred and reflected individual needs, including support to develop new skills such as trying new foods and maintaining routines for personal care. Individual risk assessments reflected people’s specific needs, including support with personal care delivered in a consistent and person-centred manner.

Staff worked closely with families to ensure care was delivered safely and in line with agreed preferences. The provider supported people who may display challenging behaviours. Where individuals challenged boundaries or became unsettled, staff responded calmly, used de-escalation techniques and maintained clear communication with families and colleagues to ensure consistent and safe support.

The provider had systems in place to respond to people’s needs and changing circumstances, including incident reporting, safeguarding processes, and regular quality assurance visits.

We found the provider had effective systems in place to monitor quality, manage risk, and safeguard people. Leaders demonstrated a clear commitment to continuous improvement and responded appropriately when issues were identified. However, leaders did not always maintain consistent record keeping for example with team meeting minutes and supervision records.

  1. Safe

    Good

    Safe – this means we looked for evidence that people were protected from abuse and avoidable harm.

    This is the first assessment for this newly registered service. This key question has been rated good.

    This meant people were safe and protected from avoidable harm.

  2. Effective

    Good

    Effective – this means we looked for evidence that people’s care, treatment and support achieved good outcomes and promoted a good quality of life, based on best available evidence.

    This is the first assessment for this newly registered service. This key question has been rated good.

    This meant people’s outcomes were consistently good, and people’s feedback confirmed this.

  3. Caring

    Good

    Caring – this means we looked for evidence that the provider involved people and treated them with compassion, kindness, dignity and respect.

    This is the first assessment for this newly registered service. This key question has been rated good.

    This meant people were supported and treated with dignity and respect; and involved as partners in their care.

  4. Responsive

    Good

    Responsive – this means we looked for evidence that the provider met people’s needs.

    This is the first assessment for this newly registered service. This key question has been rated good.

    This meant people’s needs were met through good organisation and delivery.

  5. Well-led

    Good

    Well-led – this means we looked for evidence that service leadership, management and governance assured high-quality, person-centred care; supported learning and innovation; and promoted an open, fair culture.

    This is the first assessment for this newly registered service. This key question has been rated good.

    This meant the provider was consistently managed and well-led. Leaders and the culture they created promoted high-quality, person-centred care.

Questions to ask the service

  1. Ask to see the most recent Care Quality Commission (CQC) report and what the service did about any points in it.
  2. Ask how visit times are agreed and who covers when your usual carer is away.

Registration details

Registered manager
Philippa Allen
Registered with the CQC since
What it provides
Domiciliary care service
Who it supports
Children 0-18 years, Learning disabilities or autistic spectrum disorder, Mental Health, Physical Disability, Sensory Impairment, Younger Adults

Inspection report

Read the full inspection report (opens the Care Quality Commission website)

The rating is the Care Quality Commission's. We show it as published and do not change it.

Who runs it

Ownership type
Organisation
Companies House number
11934523 (opens Companies House)

Getting help from City of Bradford Metropolitan District Council

The council can assess what care someone needs and tell them what help with the cost they may get.

Checked on the council's website, November 2026.

Common questions

Does Endorphins Group provide nursing care?
The Care Quality Commission's register does not list nursing care for Endorphins Group.
When was Endorphins Group last inspected?
The Care Quality Commission's latest rating for Endorphins Group was published on 18 August 2026.
Who runs Endorphins Group?
Endorphins Group is run by Endorphins Group Ltd.
What is Endorphins Group's CQC rating?
Its overall rating from the Care Quality Commission is Good, published on 18 August 2026.

Contact

Address
Sedbergh Community Centre, Huddersfield Road, Bradford, BD6 1DJ Map (opens Google Maps)
Read the full inspection report (opens the Care Quality Commission website)

Compare nearby

  1. RI
    Elmar Home Care Requires improvement, 0.4 miles away
  2. –
    Leeds Supported Living No overall rating, 0.7 miles away
  3. –
    New Horizons Community Care Limited Not yet rated, 1 mile away
  4. G
    Edenom Care Ltd Good, 1 mile away
  5. –
    Woodside Court Not yet rated, 1.1 miles away

See all home care services in Bradford

See all home care services in Low Moor