Rated Care Homes

Prospect Health Living Care Services Limited

G

Good

Rated on

Rating from the Care Quality Commission.

At a glance

  • 1 rating

    Only one rating on record, so there is no trend to show yet.

  • 5 months

    since the latest rating was published.

  • 29 of 36

    rated home care services in Rotherham are rated Good, like this one.

Prospect Health Living Care Services Limited: inspection record

Home care, Rotherham

Rated Good in May 2026.

Prospect Health Living Care Services Limited: inspection record: inspection ratings by year, 2015 to 2026
201520162017201820192020202120222023202420252026
Overall
Safe
Effective
Caring
Responsive
Well-led

Ratings published by the Care Quality Commission.

Compare nearby

  1. G
    Anderby Care Ltd Good, less than 0.1 miles away
  2. RI
    Lotus Home Care, Rotherham Requires improvement, less than 0.1 miles away
  3. G
    Tempnur Care Good, less than 0.1 miles away
  4. –
    DCA South Yorkshire Not yet rated, 1.2 miles away
  5. RI
    Choices Homecare (Rotherham North & Doncaster) Requires improvement, 1.3 miles away

See all home care services in Rotherham

See all home care services in Wath upon Dearne

What inspectors found

From the Care Quality Commission's assessment published 18 May 2026 (assessment visit 22 April 2026). Quoted under the Open Government Licence.

Date of Assessment: 16 April to 30 April 2026. We visited the service on 27 April 2026. This service is a domiciliary care service, registered to provide personal care for people living in their own homes in the community. They provide support to people with a range of different needs including older people, younger adults, people with physical disabilities and people living with dementia.

  • Safe Good
  • Effective Good
  • Caring Good
  • Responsive Good
  • Well-led Good
Read the rest of CQC's summary

At the time of the assessment 11 people were using the service, 10 of which were receiving the regulated activity of personal care. Not everyone who uses a domiciliary care service receives personal care. CQC only inspects where people receive personal care.

This is the first assessment for this provider under its new registration. At this assessment we reviewed all 5 key questions and all the quality statements. We rated the provider overall as good.

Due to the small size of the service, systems currently in place were more individualised and whilst lessons were learnt from incidents and shared with staff further work was needed to ensure good oversight particularly as the service expands.

Staff told us they felt supported and received regular supervision. Some training required completion or updating and although systems for recruitment were in place these needed review to fully ensure safe recruitment of staff. Action was taken by the registered manager to address these areas.

Care plans overall were detailed and person centred. One care plan needed more detail to fully mitigate risk, and some required further detail around capacity which was actioned immediately by the registered manager.

The service was working within the principles of the Mental Capacity Act 2005 (MCA) and staff were clear in their conversations with us of their responsibilities to seek consent. However, some staff were yet to complete or refresh training in this area.

People were protected from the risks of abuse and staff were trusted to keep them safe. Staff we spoke with were confident to report concerns and were satisfied action would be taken to investigate concerns raised.

The service demonstrated a positive, compassionate and open environment. Staff, people and relatives spoke positively about the culture of the service.

  1. Safe

    Good

    Safe – this means we looked for evidence that people were protected from abuse and avoidable harm.

    This is the first assessment for this newly registered service. This key question has been rated good.

    This meant people were safe and protected from avoidable harm.

  2. Effective

    Good

    Effective – this means we looked for evidence that people’s care, treatment and support achieved good outcomes and promoted a good quality of life, based on best available evidence.

    This is the first assessment for this newly registered service. This key question has been rated good.

    This meant people’s outcomes were consistently good, and people’s feedback confirmed this.

  3. Caring

    Good

    Caring – this means we looked for evidence that the provider involved people and treated them with compassion, kindness, dignity and respect.

    This is the first assessment for this newly registered service. This key question has been rated good.

    This meant people were supported and treated with dignity and respect; and involved as partners in their care.

  4. Responsive

    Good

    Responsive – this means we looked for evidence that the provider met people’s needs.

    This is the first assessment for this newly registered service. This key question has been rated good.

    This meant people’s needs were met through good organisation and delivery.

  5. Well-led

    Good

    Well-led – this means we looked for evidence that service leadership, management and governance assured high-quality, person-centred care; supported learning and innovation; and promoted an open, fair culture.

    This is the first assessment for this newly registered service. This key question has been rated good.

    This meant the service was consistently managed and well-led. Leaders and the culture they created promoted high-quality, person-centred care.

Questions to ask the service

  1. Ask to see the most recent Care Quality Commission (CQC) report and what the service did about any points in it.
  2. Ask how visit times are agreed and who covers when your usual carer is away.

Registration details

Registered manager
Raviro Ruzive
Registered with the CQC since
What it provides
Domiciliary care service
Who it supports
Dementia, Older People, Physical Disability, Younger Adults

Inspection report

Read the full inspection report (opens the Care Quality Commission website)

The rating is the Care Quality Commission's. We show it as published and do not change it.

Who runs it

Ownership type
Organisation
Companies House number
11432628 (opens Companies House)

Getting help from Rotherham Metropolitan Borough Council

The council can assess what care someone needs and tell them what help with the cost they may get.

Checked on the council's website, November 2026.

Common questions

Does Prospect Health Living Care Services Limited provide nursing care?
The Care Quality Commission's register does not list nursing care for Prospect Health Living Care Services Limited.
When was Prospect Health Living Care Services Limited last inspected?
The Care Quality Commission's latest rating for Prospect Health Living Care Services Limited was published on 18 May 2026.
Who runs Prospect Health Living Care Services Limited?
Prospect Health Living Care Services Limited is run by Prospect Health Living Care Services Limited.
What is Prospect Health Living Care Services Limited's CQC rating?
Its overall rating from the Care Quality Commission is Good, published on 18 May 2026.

Contact

Address
19 Silkstone House, Pioneer Close, Wath-upon-Dearne, Rotherham, S63 7JZ Map (opens Google Maps)
Read the full inspection report (opens the Care Quality Commission website)

Compare nearby

  1. G
    Anderby Care Ltd Good, less than 0.1 miles away
  2. RI
    Lotus Home Care, Rotherham Requires improvement, less than 0.1 miles away
  3. G
    Tempnur Care Good, less than 0.1 miles away
  4. –
    DCA South Yorkshire Not yet rated, 1.2 miles away
  5. RI
    Choices Homecare (Rotherham North & Doncaster) Requires improvement, 1.3 miles away

See all home care services in Rotherham

See all home care services in Wath upon Dearne