Rated Care Homes

Montpellier Care Company Ltd

G

Good

Rated on

Rating from the Care Quality Commission.

At a glance

  • 1 rating

    Only one rating on record, so there is no trend to show yet.

  • 13 months

    since the latest rating was published.

  • 110 of 126

    rated home care services in North Yorkshire are rated Good, like this one.

Montpellier Care Company Ltd: inspection record

Home care, North Yorkshire

Rated Good in September 2025.

Montpellier Care Company Ltd: inspection record: inspection ratings by year, 2015 to 2026
201520162017201820192020202120222023202420252026
Overall
Safe
Effective
Caring
Responsive
Well-led

Ratings published by the Care Quality Commission.

What inspectors found

From the Care Quality Commission's assessment published 9 September 2025 (assessment visit 30 July 2025). Quoted under the Open Government Licence.

Date of Assessment: 20 August to 28 August 2025. The service is a care at home service, registered with the Care Quality Commission (CQC) to provide personal care to people living in their own homes. This is to help with tasks related to personal hygiene and eating. At the time of the assessment, the provider delivered personal care to 4 people. An assessment has been undertaken of a specialist service that is registered for use by autistic people or people with a learning disability. At the time of the assessment, the service was not supporting anyone with a learning disability or an autistic person with a regulated activity. However, we assessed the care provision under Right Support, Right Care, Right Culture, as it is registered as a specialist service for this population group.

  • Safe Good
  • Effective Good
  • Caring Good
  • Responsive Good
  • Well-led Good
Read the rest of CQC's summary

Staff had received training in safeguarding people from abuse and understood their responsibilities and how to raise any concerns. Risks were well managed and care plans and risk assessments were person-centred. Staff received the training and support they needed to undertake their roles effectively. Medicines were managed and administered safely.

People’s needs were assessed prior to them starting to use the service. Care records included detailed information about people’s health conditions and how these might affect them. People were involved in all decisions about their care and support.

Staff placed great importance on ensuring people were respected and treated as individuals. Staff told us they enjoyed working for the provider and had very regular contact with them. One staff member said, “I would recommend them. 100%, if I have an issue, [provider] is always there to help.”

The provider had good knowledge and direct oversight of the service. However, there were some gaps in electronic records relating to oversight of the service. We found the provider responsive, and action was taken immediately to update electronic oversight records. The provider had developed an improvement plan that covered future plans, which had clearly identified responsibilities and timelines for action. The provider and staff were committed to providing responsive, personalised care and support. Everyone was very positive about the provider and the way the service was organised and run. People spoke about how approachable the provider was. A staff member said, “[Provider] is on the ball. She cares. It’s her company and she really cares about the people.”

  1. Safe

    Good

    Safe – this means we looked for evidence that people were protected from abuse and avoidable harm. This is the first inspection for this service. This key question has been rated good. This meant people were safe and protected from avoidable harm.

  2. Effective

    Good

    Effective – this means we looked for evidence that people’s care, treatment and support achieved good outcomes and promoted a good quality of life, based on best available evidence. This is the first inspection for this service. This key question has been rated good. This meant people’s outcomes were consistently good, and people’s feedback confirmed this.

  3. Caring

    Good

    Caring – this means we looked for evidence that the provider involved people and treated them with compassion, kindness, dignity and respect. This is the first inspection for this service. This key question has been rated good. This meant people were supported and treated with dignity and respect; and involved as partners in their care.

  4. Responsive

    Good

    Responsive – this means we looked for evidence that the provider met people’s needs. This is the first inspection for this service. This key question has been rated good. This meant people’s needs were met through good organisation and delivery.

  5. Well-led

    Good

    Well-led – this means we looked for evidence that service leadership, management and governance assured high-quality, person-centred care; supported learning and innovation; and promoted an open, fair culture. This is the first inspection for this service. This key question has been rated good. This meant the service was consistently managed and well-led. Leaders and the culture they created promoted high-quality, person-centred care.

Questions to ask the service

  1. Ask to see the most recent Care Quality Commission (CQC) report and what the service did about any points in it.
  2. Ask how visit times are agreed and who covers when your usual carer is away.

Registration details

Registered manager
Melanie Wareham
Registered with the CQC since
What it provides
Domiciliary care service
Who it supports
Dementia, Learning disabilities or autistic spectrum disorder, Mental Health, Older People, Physical Disability, Younger Adults

Inspection report

Read the full inspection report (opens the Care Quality Commission website)

The rating is the Care Quality Commission's. We show it as published and do not change it.

Who runs it

Ownership type
Organisation
Companies House number
13798444 (opens Companies House)

Getting help from North Yorkshire Council

The council can assess what care someone needs and tell them what help with the cost they may get.

Checked on the council's website, November 2026.

Common questions

Does Montpellier Care Company Ltd provide nursing care?
The Care Quality Commission's register does not list nursing care for Montpellier Care Company Ltd.
When was Montpellier Care Company Ltd last inspected?
The Care Quality Commission's latest rating for Montpellier Care Company Ltd was published on 9 September 2025.
Who runs Montpellier Care Company Ltd?
Montpellier Care Company Ltd is run by Montpellier Care Company Ltd.
What is Montpellier Care Company Ltd's CQC rating?
Its overall rating from the Care Quality Commission is Good, published on 9 September 2025.