Supreme Homecare
Home care, Newham
Good
Rated on
Rating from the Care Quality Commission.
Supreme Homecare: inspection record
Rated Good in July 2026.
| 2015 | 2016 | 2017 | 2018 | 2019 | 2020 | 2021 | 2022 | 2023 | 2024 | 2025 | 2026 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Overall | ||||||||||||
| Safe | ||||||||||||
| Effective | ||||||||||||
| Caring | ||||||||||||
| Responsive | ||||||||||||
| Well-led |
Ratings published by the Care Quality Commission.
Inspected and rated 3 times since 2016. Rated Good in 2016, 2018 and July 2026.
It has been rated Good at every inspection since 2016. The latest rating was published 3 months ago.
How it compares locally
- One of 40 Good home care services in Newham, out of 44 with a rating.
What inspectors found
From the Care Quality Commission's assessment published 20 July 2026 (assessment visit 8 January 2026). Quoted under the Open Government Licence.
We carried out our assessment of this service between 23 June 2026 to 26 June 2026. This assessment was undertaken due to the length of time since our last visit to the service. Supreme Homecare provides care to people living in their own home. Not everyone who used the service received personal care. CQC only inspects where people receive personal care. This is to help with tasks related to personal hygiene and eating. Where they do, we also consider any wider social provided. The service provided short‑term, time‑limited support, with clear pathways into ongoing care when reablement outcomes could not be achieved. At the time of the assessment 201 people were receiving personal care.
We assessed the service against ‘right support, right care, right culture’ guidance to make judgements about whether the provider guaranteed people with a learning disability and autistic people respect, equality, dignity, choices, independence and good access to local communities that most people take for granted. The service was meeting the principles of right support, right care, right culture.
Read the full summary
Risks to people’s health, safety, and wellbeing had been identified and appropriately assessed to help ensure people received safe care and support. People told us they felt safe when receiving support from staff, who demonstrated a good understanding of safeguarding procedures and how to protect people from abuse. Effective infection prevention and control measures were in place to reduce the risk of the spread of infection. The provider followed safe recruitment practices, including carrying out appropriate pre-employment checks to ensure staff were suitable to work with vulnerable people. Medicines were managed safely and in accordance with best practice guidance.
People were supported by staff who had received the appropriate recruitment checks, training, and support to carry out their roles effectively. People and relatives described staff as caring and compassionate and spoke positively about the relationships they had developed with them. Staff treated people with dignity and respect and encouraged them to maintain their independence wherever possible.
People’s needs were assessed before support commenced, including their physical health, emotional wellbeing, and communication needs. Care was delivered in a person-centred way, and care plans were reviewed regularly to ensure they remained accurate and reflective of people’s current needs. Effective systems were in place for managing complaints, and people’s communication needs were appropriately supported.
Systems and processes were established to monitor the quality and safety of the service. Staff reported positive working relationships with the provider and felt communication within the service was effective. Quality assurance systems enabled the provider to effectively oversee and continuously monitor the service.
-
Safe
Good
Safe – this means we looked for evidence that people were protected from abuse and avoidable harm.
At our last assessment we rated this key question good. At this assessment the rating has remained as good. This meant people were safe and protected from avoidable harm.
-
Effective
Good
Effective – this means we looked for evidence that people’s care, treatment and support achieved good outcomes and promoted a good quality of life, based on best available evidence.
At our last assessment we rated this key question good. At this assessment the rating has remained as good. This meant people’s outcomes were consistently good, and people’s feedback confirmed this.
-
Caring
Good
Caring – this means we looked for evidence that the provider involved people and treated them with compassion, kindness, dignity and respect.
At our last assessment we rated this key question good. At this assessment the rating has remained as good.
This meant people were supported and treated with dignity and respect; and involved as partners in their care.
-
Responsive
Good
Responsive – this means we looked for evidence that the provider met people’s needs.
At our last assessment we rated this key question good. At this assessment the rating has remained as good.
This meant people’s needs were met through good organisation and delivery.
-
Well-led
Good
Well-led – this means we looked for evidence that service leadership, management and governance assured high-quality, person-centred care; supported learning and innovation; and promoted an open, fair culture.
At our last assessment we rated this key question good. At this assessment the rating has remained as good. This meant the service was consistently managed and well-led. Leaders and the culture they created promoted high-quality, person-centred care.
Questions to ask the service
- Ask to see the most recent Care Quality Commission (CQC) report and what the service did about any points in it.
- Ask how visit times are agreed and who covers when your usual carer is away.
Contact and registration details
| Address | Unit 2, 96 Romford Road, London, E15 4EQ |
|---|---|
| Neighbourhood | Stratford, Newham |
| Phone | 020 8221 2909 |
| Registered manager | Asmau Abubakar Idris |
| Registered with the CQC since | |
| What it provides |
|
| Who it supports |
|
| Inspection reports | 2 inspection reports, latest 29 November 2018 (opens the Care Quality Commission website) Latest assessment published 20 July 2026; CQC's newer assessments are published on its website rather than as reports. |
Inspection report
Read the full inspection report (opens the Care Quality Commission website)The rating is the Care Quality Commission's. We show it as published and do not change it.
Who runs it
| Provider | Supreme Company and Sons Limited |
|---|---|
| Ownership type | Organisation |
| Companies House number | 05327819 (opens Companies House) |
Nearest alternatives
- – Ithaca House Home care, 0.2 miles awayNot yet rated
- – Niorgrey Health Care Limited Home care, 0.3 miles awayNot yet rated
- G J.C.Michael Groups Ltd Stratford Home care, 0.4 miles awayGood
- G Veemu Healthcare Office Home care, 0.4 miles awayGood
- – Angel Touch Home Care Ltd Home care, 0.4 miles awayNot yet rated
Getting help from London Borough of Newham
The council can assess what care someone needs and tell them what help with the cost they may get.
- Adult social care at London Borough of Newham
- Ask for a care needs assessment
- Phone: 020 8430 2000, option 2, Monday to Thursday 9am to 5pm, Friday 9am to 4.45pm
- Contact adult social care online
- Support for carers
- Paying for care: London Borough of Newham
Checked on the council's website, November 2026.
Common questions
- Does Supreme Homecare provide nursing care?
- The Care Quality Commission's register does not list nursing care for Supreme Homecare.
- When was Supreme Homecare last inspected?
- The Care Quality Commission's latest rating for Supreme Homecare was published on 20 July 2026.
- Who runs Supreme Homecare?
- Supreme Homecare is run by Supreme Company and Sons Limited.
- What is Supreme Homecare's CQC rating?
- Its overall rating from the Care Quality Commission is Good, published on 20 July 2026.