Rated Care Homes

Compassion First Home Care

G

Good

Rated on

Rating from the Care Quality Commission.

At a glance

  • 1 rating

    Only one rating on record, so there is no trend to show yet.

  • 6 months

    since the latest rating was published.

  • 70 of 85

    rated home care services in Warwickshire are rated Good, like this one.

Compassion First Home Care: inspection record

Home care, Warwickshire

Rated Good in April 2026.

Compassion First Home Care: inspection record: inspection ratings by year, 2015 to 2026
201520162017201820192020202120222023202420252026
Overall
Safe
Effective
Caring
Responsive
Well-led

Ratings published by the Care Quality Commission.

Compare nearby

  1. –
    Alina Homecare Stratford-upon-Avon Not yet rated, 0.2 miles away
  2. G
    Avon Support Good, 0.2 miles away
  3. G
  4. RI
    SQ Carers Ltd Requires improvement, 0.9 miles away
  5. G
    Helping Hands Warwickshire Good, 0.9 miles away

See all home care services in Warwickshire

See all home care services in Stratford-upon-Avon

What inspectors found

From the Care Quality Commission's assessment published 22 April 2026 (assessment visit 25 March 2026). Quoted under the Open Government Licence.

Date of Inspection: 02 April 2026

This inspection was announced before we visited the service to ensure someone would be available to support our inspection at the agency office. Compassion First Home Care is a service that provides personal care to people living in their own homes. Not everyone who used the service received personal care. CQC only inspects where people receive the regulated activity of personal care. At the time of our inspection, the provider was supporting 14 people with a regulated activity. This service registered with us on the 28 November 2023. This is their first inspection since registering and we reviewed all 5 key questions. The service had a registered manager who was also the owner and provider.

  • Safe Good
  • Effective Good
  • Caring Good
  • Responsive Good
  • Well-led Good
Read the rest of CQC's summary

People were complimentary about the service and the support they received. Assessments were completed before care was provided which helped the service understand how they could meet people’s needs from the start. People’s care records included important information from a range of sources, including the person, their relatives and guidance from other professionals who were involved in their care, such as district nurses. People’s care calls were planned when they needed them and for the right duration to meet their needs. People’s care information provided good detail which directed staff, what they had to do at each planned care call. While most people’s care plan information was detailed and person-centred, some care plans and risk management plans lacked clarity in some areas, which we raised with the provider. The registered manager assured us they would act promptly to address this.

Staff respected people's rights and they made sure; people were involved in decisions about their care and important events. People’s care information was written recognising them as individuals which encouraged them to be as independent as possible.Some people administered their own medicines whilst staff helped other people who needed support. Staff were trained and assessed as competent. We found improvements to how some prescription creams were administered and recorded was needed. The registered manager agreed to improve this.Staff were recruited safely through thorough checks of their suitability. Staff told us they received training that helped them to undertake their roles and the provider encouraged staff to undertake further qualifications to support them in their role.

The registered manager had a clear vision of what they wanted to achieve and their processes and values supported this ambition. There was a culture of learning and improving. The registered manager was growing the business at a sustainable rate without impacting on the quality-of-care people received. Whilst there were systems in place to monitor quality, the registered manager needed to consider the robustness of those checks to demonstrate how improvement actions were made and how they were being monitored to ensure they were embedded into day-to-day practice. A recent addition to the management structure was underway to strengthen the quality assurance systems through improved scrutiny. The registered manager recognised they had a strong team that wanted to provide good care outcomes for people. They were proud of their staff team, and this was recognised through rewards and recognition which helped the service retain staff.

  1. Safe

    Good

    Safe – this means we looked for evidence that people were protected from abuse and avoidable harm.

    This is the first assessment for this service. This key question has been rated good. This meant people were safe and protected from avoidable harm.

  2. Effective

    Good

    Effective – this means we looked for evidence that people’s care, treatment and support achieved good outcomes and promoted a good quality of life, based on best available evidence.

    This is the first assessment for this service. This key question has been rated good. This meant people’s outcomes were consistently good, and people’s feedback confirmed this.

  3. Caring

    Good

    Caring – this means we looked for evidence that the provider involved people and treated them with compassion, kindness, dignity and respect.

    This is the first assessment for this service. This key question has been rated good. This meant people were supported and treated with dignity and respect; and involved as partners in their care.

  4. Responsive

    Good

    Responsive – this means we looked for evidence that the provider met people’s needs.

    This is the first assessment for this service. This key question has been rated good. This meant people’s needs were met through good organisation and delivery.

  5. Well-led

    Good

    Well-led – this means we looked for evidence that service leadership, management and governance assured high-quality, person-centred care; supported learning and innovation; and promoted an open, fair culture.

    This is the first assessment for this service. This key question has been rated good. This meant the service was consistently managed and well-led. Leaders and the culture they created promoted high-quality, person-centred care.

Questions to ask the service

  1. Ask to see the most recent Care Quality Commission (CQC) report and what the service did about any points in it.
  2. Ask how visit times are agreed and who covers when your usual carer is away.

Registration details

Registered manager
Brandon Shiels
Registered with the CQC since
What it provides
Domiciliary care service
Who it supports
Dementia, Older People, Physical Disability, Sensory Impairment, Younger Adults

Inspection report

Read the full inspection report (opens the Care Quality Commission website)

The rating is the Care Quality Commission's. We show it as published and do not change it.

Who runs it

Ownership type
Organisation
Companies House number
15040372 (opens Companies House)

Getting help from Warwickshire County Council

The council can assess what care someone needs and tell them what help with the cost they may get.

Checked on the council's website, November 2026.

Common questions

Does Compassion First Home Care provide nursing care?
The Care Quality Commission's register does not list nursing care for Compassion First Home Care.
When was Compassion First Home Care last inspected?
The Care Quality Commission's latest rating for Compassion First Home Care was published on 22 April 2026.
Who runs Compassion First Home Care?
Compassion First Home Care is run by Compassion First Home Care Ltd.
What is Compassion First Home Care's CQC rating?
Its overall rating from the Care Quality Commission is Good, published on 22 April 2026.

Contact

Phone
01789 224429
Address
Unit 5, Shottery Brook Office Park, Timothys Bridge Road, Stratford Enterprise Park, Stratford-upon-avon, CV37 9NR Map (opens Google Maps)
Read the full inspection report (opens the Care Quality Commission website)

Compare nearby

  1. –
    Alina Homecare Stratford-upon-Avon Not yet rated, 0.2 miles away
  2. G
    Avon Support Good, 0.2 miles away
  3. G
  4. RI
    SQ Carers Ltd Requires improvement, 0.9 miles away
  5. G
    Helping Hands Warwickshire Good, 0.9 miles away

See all home care services in Warwickshire

See all home care services in Stratford-upon-Avon