Rated Care Homes

GoodOaks Homecare - Isle of Wight

G

Good

Rated on

Rating from the Care Quality Commission.

At a glance

  • 1 rating

    Only one rating on record, so there is no trend to show yet.

  • 8 months

    since the latest rating was published.

  • 20 of 29

    rated home care services in Isle of Wight are rated Good, like this one.

GoodOaks Homecare - Isle of Wight: inspection record

Home care, Isle of Wight

Rated Good in February 2026.

GoodOaks Homecare - Isle of Wight: inspection record: inspection ratings by year, 2015 to 2026
201520162017201820192020202120222023202420252026
Overall
Safe
Effective
Caring
Responsive
Well-led

Ratings published by the Care Quality Commission.

Compare nearby

  1. –
    Call on Me Ltd No overall rating, 0.5 miles away
  2. –
    Milford Del Support Agency No overall rating, 0.5 miles away
  3. O
    Maximus Support Services Ltd Outstanding, 1.1 miles away
  4. G
    Tile House Good, 1.3 miles away
  5. –
    Trusted Homecare Ltd Not yet rated, 1.5 miles away

See all home care services in Isle of Wight

See all home care services in Shanklin

What inspectors found

From the Care Quality Commission's assessment published 26 February 2026 (assessment visit 4 February 2026). Quoted under the Open Government Licence.

Date of assessment:10 February 2026 to 20 February 2026. This was the first inspection of the service. GoodOaks Homecare – Isle of Wight provides visiting domiciliary support and live‑in care to older people, including those with complex needs.

  • Safe Good
  • Effective Good
  • Caring Good
  • Responsive Good
  • Well-led Good
Read the rest of CQC's summary

People and families consistently reported positive experiences of care. They said they felt safe with staff, describing care staff as “kind,” “gentle,” “brilliant,” and respectful of their dignity. They told us care staff built trusting relationships, arrived on time and stayed for the full visit duration, and supported them in ways that reflected what mattered to the person. Family members described improvements in people’s comfort and wellbeing, including reduced anxiety due to continuity of care staff and consistent emotional support. Staff also provided highly personalised assistance during difficult life events.

The provider demonstrated a good culture of learning and improvement. Audits of medicines, care plans, staff files and infection control were routinely completed and informed changes to practice. Staff and managers used incidents and concerns constructively, and there was a clear duty of candour process. People and families said managers responded quickly to changes, communicated clearly and reviewed care plans when needs changed. External professionals described communication as effective and reported good joint working across complex packages of care.

Staff told us they received training, induction and ongoing support from managers, and many said they felt valued, listened to and part of a close‑knit team. Several staff described management as “amazing,” “supportive,” and committed to developing their confidence. Recruitment processes were generally robust, although improvements were needed in some previous employment conduct checks and the documented evidence of supervisions. A small number of staff said rota changes were not always communicated well or did not always take full account of individual needs. Although there was no evidence of impact on people the registered manager agreed to review this.

Governance systems were well established, supported by a compliance officer and franchise‑wide oversight. Record keeping, staff file checks, risk assessments and monitoring processes were in place and used consistently. People and families said they could contact the registered manager easily and described them as approachable, responsive and proactive, responding promptly to queries or concerns.

Overall, people experienced caring, personalised and reliable support. The service demonstrated strong values, good communication, and a commitment to continuous improvement.

  1. Safe

    Good

    Safe – this means we looked for evidence that people were protected from abuse and avoidable harm.

    This is the first inspection for this service. This key question has been rated good. This meant people were safe and protected from avoidable harm.

  2. Effective

    Good

    Effective – this means we looked for evidence that people’s care, treatment and support achieved good outcomes and promoted a good quality of life, based on best available evidence.

    This is the first inspection for this service. This key question has been rated good. This meant people’s outcomes were consistently good, and people’s feedback confirmed this.

  3. Caring

    Good

    Caring – this means we looked for evidence that the provider involved people and treated them with compassion, kindness, dignity and respect.

    This is the first inspection for this service. This key question has been rated good. This meant the service was consistently managed and well-led. Leaders and the culture they created promoted high-quality, person-centred care.

  4. Responsive

    Good

    Responsive – this means we looked for evidence that the provider met people’s needs.

    This is the first inspection for this service. This key question has been rated good. This meant people’s needs were met through good organisation and delivery.

  5. Well-led

    Good

    Well-led – this means we looked for evidence that leadership, management and governance assured high-quality, person-centred care; supported learning and innovation; and promoted an open, fair culture.

    This is the first inspection for this service. This key question has been rated good. This meant the service was consistently managed and well-led. Leaders and the culture they created promoted high-quality, person-centred care.

Questions to ask the service

  1. Ask to see the most recent Care Quality Commission (CQC) report and what the service did about any points in it.
  2. Ask how visit times are agreed and who covers when your usual carer is away.

Registration details

Registered manager
Camelia Moise Gogoasa
Registered with the CQC since
What it provides
Domiciliary care service
Who it supports
Dementia, Mental Health, Older People, Physical Disability, Sensory Impairment, Younger Adults

Inspection report

Read the full inspection report (opens the Care Quality Commission website)

The rating is the Care Quality Commission's. We show it as published and do not change it.

Who runs it

Ownership type
Organisation
Companies House number
15034145 (opens Companies House)

Getting help from Isle of Wight Council

The council can assess what care someone needs and tell them what help with the cost they may get.

Checked on the council's website, November 2026.

Common questions

Does GoodOaks Homecare - Isle of Wight provide nursing care?
The Care Quality Commission's register does not list nursing care for GoodOaks Homecare - Isle of Wight.
When was GoodOaks Homecare - Isle of Wight last inspected?
The Care Quality Commission's latest rating for GoodOaks Homecare - Isle of Wight was published on 26 February 2026.
Who runs GoodOaks Homecare - Isle of Wight?
GoodOaks Homecare - Isle of Wight is run by FCG Homecare Limited.
What is GoodOaks Homecare - Isle of Wight's CQC rating?
Its overall rating from the Care Quality Commission is Good, published on 26 February 2026.

Contact

Phone
07849 224860
Address
Unit B10, Spithead Business Centre, Newport Road, Sandown, PO36 9PH Map (opens Google Maps)
Read the full inspection report (opens the Care Quality Commission website)

Compare nearby

  1. –
    Call on Me Ltd No overall rating, 0.5 miles away
  2. –
    Milford Del Support Agency No overall rating, 0.5 miles away
  3. O
    Maximus Support Services Ltd Outstanding, 1.1 miles away
  4. G
    Tile House Good, 1.3 miles away
  5. –
    Trusted Homecare Ltd Not yet rated, 1.5 miles away

See all home care services in Isle of Wight

See all home care services in Shanklin