Boyce Care
- Home care
- Registered since 2015
- Surrey, South East
Good
Rated on
Rating from the Care Quality Commission.
At a glance
2 ratings
Its last inspection improved it from Requires improvement to Good.
9 years
since the latest rating was published. A rating this old may not show how the service is today.
177 of 209
rated home care services in Surrey are rated Good, like this one.
Boyce Care: inspection record
Rated Good in February 2018, up from Requires improvement.
| 2015 | 2016 | 2017 | 2018 | 2019 | 2020 | 2021 | 2022 | 2023 | 2024 | 2025 | 2026 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Overall | ||||||||||||
| Safe | ||||||||||||
| Effective | ||||||||||||
| Caring | ||||||||||||
| Responsive | ||||||||||||
| Well-led |
Ratings published by the Care Quality Commission.
Compare nearby
- G Allium Homecare Good, 0.7 miles away
- RI Morecare Services(UK)Ltd Requires improvement, 1.3 miles away
- – Sunbury Homecare Limited Not yet rated, 1.4 miles away
- G Apex Prime Care - North West Surrey Good, 1.4 miles away
- – Endusull Care Limited Not yet rated, 1.5 miles away
What inspectors found
From the Care Quality Commission's inspection report published 27 February 2018. Quoted under the Open Government Licence.
Boyce Care is a domiciliary care agency. It provides personal care to people living in their own houses in the community. It provides a service to younger people with a learning disability. Some people also have a physical disability. Not everyone using Boyce Care receives regulated activity; CQC only inspects the service being received by people provided with 'personal care'; help with tasks related to personal hygiene and eating. Where they do we also take into account any wider social care provided. The service provides day care and live in care. At the time of our inspection the service provided a regulated activity to 16 people.
Read the rest of CQC's summary
There was a registered manager in post at the time of the inspection. A registered manager is a person who has registered with the Care Quality Commission (CQC) to manage the service. Like registered providers, they are 'registered persons'. Registered persons have legal responsibility for meeting the requirements in the Health and Social Care Act 2008 and associated Regulations about how the service is run. We were supported on the inspection by the registered manager and the senior management team.
There were appropriate numbers of staff available. People who required one to one care from staff always received this. People said that they felt safe. Staff ensured that people were protected against the risk of abuse and told us that they would not hesitate in reporting any concerns. Robust recruitment of staff took place before they started work.
Detailed risk assessments took place in relation to people's individual needs. The environment was checked in relation to potential risks to people. In the event of an emergency there were plans in place to protect people. Accidents and incidents were acted upon and steps taken to reduce the risks.
People's medicines were managed safely and appropriately by staff. People had access to pain relief when they needed it. People's nutritional and hydration needs were managed to ensure they received the most appropriate care. People were supported to lead healthy lives.
People were supported and encouraged to eat healthily and had access to nutritious food. Health care professionals were involved with the care of people and people were supported to attend health care appointments. People's needs were assessed fully before they started to receive care at the service.
Training and supervision were provided to staff which ensured that the most appropriate care was being provided to people. We saw through observations that staff were knowledgeable and effective in the care they provided. Staff were effective in sharing information in relation to peoples's care.
The Mental Capacity Act 2005 (MCA) is a legal framework about how decisions should be taken where people may lack capacity to do so for themselves. Staff had received training around (MCA) and how they needed to put it into practice and staff were knowledgeable in this. There were people at the service who had the capacity to make decisions about their care and staff respected this. Where people were being restricted, applications were submitted to the local authority in line with the legal requirements.
Staff showed care and empathy towards people. It was clear that staff had good relationships with people and understood what was important to them. Staff showed patience, dignity and respect and people responded well to staff.
People received individualised care and were able to make choices around how they wanted their room to look and how they wanted their care to be delivered. People were supported to be independent and to make their own choices.
Care plans were detailed and specific to each person. There was guidance for staff on how best to provide the support people needed. Staff were aware of what care needed to be provided. People were supported to participate in activities that they enjoyed.
People were supported to make a complaint if they needed to. Complaints were investigated and improvements made where needed.
People and staff were complimentary of the management and the support they received. Staff worked well as a team and felt supported and valued.
Steps were taken to review the delivery of care with actions to make improvements. Methods the provider used included surveys, audits, staff meetings and spot checks.
Services that provide health and social care to people are required to inform the Care Quality Commission (CQC) of important events that happen in the service. The registered manager had informed the CQC of significant events including significant incidents and safeguarding concerns.
Further information is in the detailed findings below
The five questions we ask about services and what we found
Questions to ask the service
- The last rating is 9 years old. Ask what has changed since then.
- Ask to see the most recent Care Quality Commission (CQC) report and what the service did about any points in it.
- Ask how visit times are agreed and who covers when your usual carer is away.
Registration details
- Registered manager
- Tony Boyce
- Registered with the CQC since
- What it provides
- Domiciliary care service
- Who it supports
- Learning disabilities or autistic spectrum disorder
Inspection report
Read the full inspection report (opens the Care Quality Commission website)2 inspection reports, latest 27 February 2018. The reports are on the Care Quality Commission website.
The rating is the Care Quality Commission's. We show it as published and do not change it.
Who runs it
- Provider
- Boyce Care Ltd
- Ownership type
- Organisation
- Companies House number
- 06340784 (opens Companies House)
Getting help from Surrey County Council
The council can assess what care someone needs and tell them what help with the cost they may get.
- Adult social care at Surrey County Council
- Ask for a care needs assessment
- Phone: 0300 200 1005, Monday to Friday, 9am to 5pm
- Contact adult social care online
- Support for carers
- Paying for care: Surrey County Council
Checked on the council's website, November 2026.
Common questions
- Does Boyce Care provide nursing care?
- The Care Quality Commission's register does not list nursing care for Boyce Care.
- When was Boyce Care last inspected?
- The Care Quality Commission's latest rating for Boyce Care was published on 27 February 2018.
- Who runs Boyce Care?
- Boyce Care is run by Boyce Care Ltd.
- What is Boyce Care's CQC rating?
- Its overall rating from the Care Quality Commission is Good, published on 27 February 2018.
Contact
- Phone
- 07590 111121
- Address
- 172 Feltham Hill Road, Ashford, TW15 1LF Map (opens Google Maps)
Compare nearby
- G Allium Homecare Good, 0.7 miles away
- RI Morecare Services(UK)Ltd Requires improvement, 1.3 miles away
- – Sunbury Homecare Limited Not yet rated, 1.4 miles away
- G Apex Prime Care - North West Surrey Good, 1.4 miles away
- – Endusull Care Limited Not yet rated, 1.5 miles away