Rated Care Homes

SUPPORTED LIVING ENABLEMENT SERVICES

G

Good

Rated on

Rating from the Care Quality Commission.

At a glance

  • 1 rating

    Only one rating on record, so there is no trend to show yet.

  • 1 month

    since the latest rating was published.

  • 166 of 205

    rated home care services in Hampshire are rated Good, like this one.

SUPPORTED LIVING ENABLEMENT SERVICES: inspection record

Home care, Hampshire

Rated Good in September 2026.

SUPPORTED LIVING ENABLEMENT SERVICES: inspection record: inspection ratings by year, 2015 to 2026
201520162017201820192020202120222023202420252026
Overall
Safe
Effective
Caring
Responsive
Well-led

Ratings published by the Care Quality Commission.

Compare nearby

  1. –
    In Home Care Basingstoke Not yet rated, 0.5 miles away
  2. G
    Mayfair Homecare - Basingstoke Good, 0.5 miles away
  3. G
    Your Life (Basingstoke) Good, 0.6 miles away
  4. RI
    Maycare Requires improvement, 0.9 miles away
  5. G
    Anytime Care 2020 (Hampshire) Good, 1 mile away

See all home care services in Hampshire

See all home care services in Basingstoke

What inspectors found

From the Care Quality Commission's assessment published 18 September 2026 (assessment visit 8 July 2026). Quoted under the Open Government Licence.

Date of Assessment: 4 to 12 August 2026. This assessment was prompted by a review of the information we held about the service. This care at home service provides support to younger and older people living in their own homes. Not everyone who used the service was receiving the regulated activity of personal care, which is help with tasks related to personal hygiene and eating. At the time of our inspection, they were providing personal care to 3 people. This was our first inspection of the service.

  • Safe Good
  • Effective Good
  • Caring Good
  • Responsive Good
  • Well-led Good
Read the rest of CQC's summary

The service was a small domiciliary care agency supporting people in the Hampshire area. The registered manager was actively involved in the day-to-day running of the service, balancing management responsibilities with direct care delivery. This helped them maintain a good understanding of people's needs and build positive relationships with people and staff. People and relatives spoke positively about the support they received.

The provider was responsive to people's needs and worked to promote consistency in staffing and care visit times. They reviewed and adjusted care arrangements when required and maintained effective communication with people and their relatives. This helped ensure there was a shared understanding of how care should be delivered and the outcomes people wanted to achieve.

Staff were motivated and committed to providing person-centred care. They described how they supported people to maintain their independence, improve their health and wellbeing, and achieve positive outcomes. Staff received appropriate training and told us they felt well supported in their roles.

Some care plans did not fully reflect the support staff provided. The registered manager acknowledged improvements were needed to ensure all care related risks and health monitoring requirements were detailed. However, we found people's individual routines and preferences around their personal care were consistently documented in care plans.

The provider was developing systems for incident management, safeguarding oversight and staff engagement. While some improvements were still being embedded, the registered manager had addressed key risks and was receptive to feedback from stakeholders, demonstrating a commitment to ongoing improvement in safety and quality.

  1. Safe

    Good

    Safe – this means we looked for evidence that people were protected from abuse and avoidable harm. This is the first assessment for this service. This key question has been rated good. This meant people were safe and protected from avoidable harm.

  2. Effective

    Good

    Effective – this means we looked for evidence that people’s care, treatment and support achieved good outcomes and promoted a good quality of life, based on best available evidence. This is the first assessment for this service. This key question has been rated good This meant people’s outcomes were consistently good, and people’s feedback confirmed this.

  3. Caring

    Good

    Caring – this means we looked for evidence that the provider involved people and treated them with compassion, kindness, dignity and respect. This is the first assessment for this service. This key question has been rated good. This meant people were supported and treated with dignity and respect; and involved as partners in their care.

  4. Responsive

    Good

    Responsive – this means we looked for evidence the provider met people’s needs. This is the first assessment for this service. This key question has been rated good. This meant people’s needs were met through good organisation and delivery.

  5. Well-led

    Good

    Well-led – this means we looked for evidence that leadership, management and governance assured high-quality, person-centred care; supported learning and innovation; and promoted an open, fair culture. This is the first assessment for this service. This key question has been rated good. This meant the service was consistently managed and well-led. Leaders and the culture they created promoted high-quality, person-centred care.

Questions to ask the service

  1. Ask to see the most recent Care Quality Commission (CQC) report and what the service did about any points in it.
  2. Ask how visit times are agreed and who covers when your usual carer is away.

Registration details

Registered manager
Deborah Ogbaji
Registered with the CQC since
What it provides
Domiciliary care service
Who it supports
Mental Health, Older People, Physical Disability, Younger Adults

Inspection report

Read the full inspection report (opens the Care Quality Commission website)

The rating is the Care Quality Commission's. We show it as published and do not change it.

Who runs it

Ownership type
Organisation
Companies House number
14653167 (opens Companies House)

Getting help from Hampshire County Council

The council can assess what care someone needs and tell them what help with the cost they may get.

Checked on the council's website, November 2026.

Common questions

Does SUPPORTED LIVING ENABLEMENT SERVICES provide nursing care?
The Care Quality Commission's register does not list nursing care for SUPPORTED LIVING ENABLEMENT SERVICES.
When was SUPPORTED LIVING ENABLEMENT SERVICES last inspected?
The Care Quality Commission's latest rating for SUPPORTED LIVING ENABLEMENT SERVICES was published on 18 September 2026.
Who runs SUPPORTED LIVING ENABLEMENT SERVICES?
SUPPORTED LIVING ENABLEMENT SERVICES is run by Supported Living Enablement Services Ltd.
What is SUPPORTED LIVING ENABLEMENT SERVICES's CQC rating?
Its overall rating from the Care Quality Commission is Good, published on 18 September 2026.

Contact

Phone
07443 942255
Address
273 Sinclair Drive, Basingstoke, RG21 6AG Map (opens Google Maps)
Read the full inspection report (opens the Care Quality Commission website)

Compare nearby

  1. –
    In Home Care Basingstoke Not yet rated, 0.5 miles away
  2. G
    Mayfair Homecare - Basingstoke Good, 0.5 miles away
  3. G
    Your Life (Basingstoke) Good, 0.6 miles away
  4. RI
    Maycare Requires improvement, 0.9 miles away
  5. G
    Anytime Care 2020 (Hampshire) Good, 1 mile away

See all home care services in Hampshire

See all home care services in Basingstoke