IECC CARE
- Home care
- Dementia care
- Registered since 2015
- Colchester, Essex, East of England
No overall rating
No overall rating: this location offers more than one kind of service, so the CQC rates each service separately.
At a glance
3 ratings
Its last inspection moved it down from Good to Inadequate.
5 months
since the latest rating was published.
91%
of rated home care services in Essex are Good or Outstanding (86% across the East of England, 88% across England).
IECC CARE: inspection record
This service has no overall rating at present. The squares show its earlier ratings.
| 2015 | 2016 | 2017 | 2018 | 2019 | 2020 | 2021 | 2022 | 2023 | 2024 | 2025 | 2026 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Overall | ||||||||||||
| Safe | ||||||||||||
| Effective | ||||||||||||
| Caring | ||||||||||||
| Responsive | ||||||||||||
| Well-led |
Ratings published by the Care Quality Commission.
Compare nearby
Nearest rated Good or Outstanding: Ruby Care Services (Good, 0.2 miles away) and Care Givers Limited (Good, 0.3 miles away).
Nearest home care services:
- G Ruby Care Services Good, 0.2 miles away
- G Care Givers Limited Good, 0.3 miles away
- – Extra Care Limited Not yet rated, 0.3 miles away
- RI Fuchsia Homecare Colchester Requires improvement, 0.3 miles away
- – Butterfly's Care Not yet rated, 0.5 miles away
What inspectors found
From the Care Quality Commission's assessment published 1 June 2026 (assessment visit 29 January 2026). Quoted under the Open Government Licence.
Date of assessment: 26 February to 02 April 2026.
IECC Care provides personal care to people as part of the support they need to live in their own homes. Personal care is provided under separate contractual arrangements to those for the person's housing. CQC only inspects where people receive personal care. This is help with tasks related to personal hygiene and eating. Where they do, we also consider any wider social care provided. At the time of the inspection the service was supporting 14 people living across 5 supported living services, including single self-contained flats or in shared bungalows. Everyone who used the service received personal care.
- Safe No rating
- Effective Good
- Caring Good
- Responsive No rating
- Well-led No rating
Read the rest of CQC's summary
We completed this assessment to check for improvements since our last assessment in October 2023. The provider was previously in breach of the regulations relating to person centred care, safe care and treatment, safeguarding people from abuse, safe recruitment, staff training and good governance. Although improvements were noted, the provider was found to be in breach of regulations for infection prevention and control (IPC), safe environments and equipment and a continued breaches relating to staff training and good governance.
We have assessed the service against the ‘Right support, right care, right culture’ (RS, RC, RC) guidance to make judgements about whether the provider guaranteed people with a learning disability and autistic people respect, equality, dignity, choices, independence and good access to local communities that most people take for granted.
Right Culture - Systems and processes for assessing, monitoring, and improving the quality and safety of the service required further strengthening. Checks on the premises were not consistently identifying IPC issues and necessary improvements and repairs to the premises and equipment. Language used in people’s care records did not always demonstrate a caring and compassionate approach to understanding what the person was experiencing or what they were communicating during times of anxiety and distress.
Right care - The provider was not always following the RS, RC, RC or CQC Housing with care guidance for supported living services to ensure people had a choice about where, and who they lived with and who provided their care. The provider has since submitted an action plan to rectify this including amending people’s tenancy agreements to reflect a clear separation between the provision of the accommodation and people’s care. The service had sufficient staffing levels to meet people’s needs, including provision of additional staff to facilitate access to the community. However, staff training needed to improve.
Right support - People received care and support from staff that knew them well. Staff felt valued and supported by the directors and management team. External healthcare professionals were complimentary about how the service worked with them and supported people but noted the need to improve communication and record keeping.
This service has been in Special Measures since October 2023. The provider demonstrated improvements that have been made. The service is no longer rated as inadequate overall or in any of the key questions. Therefore, this service is no longer in Special Measures. We have asked the provider for an action plan in response to the concerns found at this assessment.
-
Safe
No rating
Safe – this means we looked for evidence that people were protected from abuse and avoidable harm. At our last assessment we rated this key question Inadequate. At this assessment the rating has changed to Requires improvement. This meant some aspects of the service were not always safe and there was limited assurance about safety. There was an increased risk that people could be harmed.
The service was in breach of legal regulation in relation to safe care and treatment. People were not always protected from the risk of harm including risks associated with infection prevention and control (IPC), environmental and equipment safety. The provider’s approach to staff training, assessment, and competency assurance needed to improve to ensure staff had the skills and knowledge to meet people’s needs.
-
Effective
Good
Effective – this means we looked for evidence that people’s care, treatment and support achieved good outcomes and promoted a good quality of life, based on best available evidence.
At our last assessment we rated this key question Requires improvement. At this assessment the rating has changed to Good. This meant people’s outcomes were consistently good, and people’s feedback confirmed this.
-
Caring
Good
Caring – this means we looked for evidence that the provider involved people and treated them with compassion, kindness, dignity and respect.
At our last assessment we rated this key question Requires improvement. At this assessment the rating has changed to Good. This meant people were supported and treated with dignity and respect; and involved as partners in their care.
-
Responsive
No rating
Responsive – this means we looked for evidence that the provider met people’s needs.
At our last assessment we rated this key question Requires improvement. At this assessment the rating has remained Requires improvement. This meant people’s needs were not always met.
-
Well-led
No rating
Well-led – this means we looked for evidence that service leadership, management and governance assured high-quality, person-centred care; supported learning and innovation; and promoted an open, fair culture.
At our last assessment we rated this key question Inadequate. At this assessment the rating has changed to Requires improvement. This meant the management and leadership was inconsistent. Leaders and the culture they created did not always support the delivery of high-quality, person-centred care.
The service continues to be in breach of legal regulation in relation to governance at the service. Systems and processes for assessing, monitoring, and improving the quality and safety of the service required further strengthening.
Ratings by service
The Care Quality Commission rates each kind of service at this location separately.
| Service | Rating | Date | Safe | Effective | Caring | Responsive | Well-led |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Homecare | No rating | Safe: No rating | Effective: No rating | Caring: No rating | Responsive: No rating | Well-led: No rating | |
| Supported Living | No rating | Safe: No rating | Effective: Good | Caring: Good | Responsive: No rating | Well-led: No rating |
Questions to ask the service
- Safe was rated Inadequate on 24 October 2023. Ask how medicines are managed, how staffing levels are decided and how incidents are reviewed.
- Effective was rated Requires improvement on 24 October 2023. Ask about staff training and how health appointments are arranged.
- Caring was rated Requires improvement on 24 October 2023. Ask how staff protect dignity and how people are involved in decisions about their care.
- Responsive was rated Requires improvement on 24 October 2023. Ask to see how care plans are kept up to date, how complaints are handled.
Registration details
- Registered manager
- Tracey Shea
- Registered with the CQC since
- What it provides
- Domiciliary care service, Supported living service
- Who it supports
- Children 0-18 years, Dementia, Learning disabilities or autistic spectrum disorder, Mental Health, Older People, People who misuse drugs and alcohol, Physical Disability, Sensory Impairment, Younger Adults
Inspection report
Read the full inspection report (opens the Care Quality Commission website)3 inspection reports, latest 24 October 2023. Latest assessment published 1 June 2026; the Care Quality Commission's newer assessments are published on its website rather than as reports.
The rating is the Care Quality Commission's. We show it as published and do not change it.
Who runs it
- Ownership type
- Organisation
- Companies House number
- 08591892 (opens Companies House)
Getting help from Essex County Council
The council can assess what care someone needs and tell them what help with the cost they may get.
- Adult social care at Essex County Council
- Ask for a care needs assessment
- Phone: 0345 603 7630, Monday to Thursday 8.45am to 5pm, Friday 8.45am to 4.30pm
- Contact adult social care online
- Support for carers
- Paying for care: Essex County Council
Checked on the council's website, November 2026.
Common questions
- Does IECC CARE provide nursing care?
- The Care Quality Commission's register does not list nursing care for IECC CARE.
- When was IECC CARE last inspected?
- The Care Quality Commission's latest rating for IECC CARE was published on 1 June 2026.
- Who runs IECC CARE?
- IECC CARE is run by (IECC Care) Independent Excel Care Consortium Limited.
- What is IECC CARE's CQC rating?
- No overall rating: this location offers more than one kind of service, so the CQC rates each service separately.
Contact
- Phone
- 01206 793630
- Address
- 2 Gladstone Road, Colchester, CO1 2EB Map (opens Google Maps)
Compare nearby
Nearest rated Good or Outstanding: Ruby Care Services (Good, 0.2 miles away) and Care Givers Limited (Good, 0.3 miles away).
Nearest home care services:
- G Ruby Care Services Good, 0.2 miles away
- G Care Givers Limited Good, 0.3 miles away
- – Extra Care Limited Not yet rated, 0.3 miles away
- RI Fuchsia Homecare Colchester Requires improvement, 0.3 miles away
- – Butterfly's Care Not yet rated, 0.5 miles away